Well-Received Mukasey Likely To Be Confirmed As Attorney General

October 17th, 2007 by JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

The Bush administration’s candidate for Attorney General is proving to be a choice who’s quickly picking up bipartisan support — the kind of “consensus” choice many have long sought.

It looks like he now has one powerful and previously balking Democrat nearly in his corner:

The chairman of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee said Tuesday he expects Michael Mukasey to be confirmed as the next U.S. attorney general, succeeding Alberto Gonzales who stepped down amid pressure from lawmakers.

Speaking on the eve of Mukasey’s confirmation hearing before the committee, Chairman Patrick Leahy of Vermont also said that unlike his predecessor, Mukasey would be independent of the White House.

“There are still some within the administration that want the Department of Justice just to be a political arm of the White House,” Leahy said after a private meeting with the retired federal district court judge. “I want that to change. I think he can change it.”

In other words: the advance buzz that a doubter like Leahy has gotten about Mukasey has been good and he considers the likely-AG someone who is an independent thinker:

He added: “Judge Mukasey’s answers will signal whether he will be the people’s attorney general or merely the president’s lawyer.”

President Bush nominated Mukasey last month after Gonzales’ resignation. Leahy said Mukasey, who has drawn bipartisan praise, will likely be confirmed.

“Right now from what I have seen, I would expect him to be confirmed,” Leahy said.

In other words: he’s in.

Mukasey seems to be the same kind of choice as when Robert Gates replaced the highly controversial Donald Rumsfeld as Secretary of Defense. Although some Democrats still greatly differ with Gates on policy, he is respected as a kind of government technocrat versus a political partisan. But this doesn’t mean he won’t face some tough questioning, CNN notes:

President Bush’s nominee for attorney general will face tough questioning on a range of hot-button issues — including no-warrant surveillance and torture policy — during confirmation hearings Wednesday.

But warnings of a potentially bumpy confirmation process for Michael Mukasey have given way to predictions of smooth sailing for the retired federal judge.

Even so, as the Washington Post notes, Mukasey’s confirmation is expected to be one of the most bipartisan ever.

The current plan calls for Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Sen. Arlen Specter (Pa.), the top Republican on the panel, to meet Mukasey beforehand in the Capitol and walk him into the committee room together for the 10 a.m. hearing.

There, before the cameras, Mukasey is going to be introduced to the committee by a pair of senators who have played leading roles in recent national Democratic campaigns: Joe Lieberman (Conn.), the 2000 vice-presidential nominee who won re-election to the Senate as an independent last year, and Charles Schumer (N.Y.), who as chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee helped toss Republicans out of power.

Leahy told Capitol Briefing the atmospherics surrounding the Mukasey confirmation were “tripartisan”.

Even so, Mukasey will be under pressure from civil libertarians to change some things at the Justice Department. Some have lists of questions they will insist politicos ask him. Some will demand he renounce torture.

But it looks like it is a “done deal” for several reasons. He looks quite impressive on several fronts when compared to former Attorney General Gonzales — which really isn’t too difficult a feat. But he also has a solid record and reportedly enjoys an excellent reputation among lawyers and members of both political parties.

Unless there’s some major hitch, this appointment will be seen as one of George Bush’s smarter moves — defusing the Attorney General’s office and the Justice Department from being enmeshed in the powder-keg of political polarization. Democrats and other Bush administration critics may have their differences with Mukasey, but right now all signs suggest that they will consider much him more than just “the President’s lawyer.”

This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 at 1:52 am and is filed under Bush Administration, Legal Matters, Michael Mukasey, Republicans, Democrats, Politics, Congress, Law & Legal Matters. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Alex Jimenez As FISA Poster Boy »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.