Alberto Gonzales, George Bush, John Ashcroft And The “Wednesday Night Ambush”

May 18th, 2007
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

Anyone who lived through the administration of Richard Nixon and the Watergate crisis fully remembers The Saturday Night Massacre (I was in New Delhi, India, interning on The Hindustan Times and was so upset about it that I went into the office of editor George Verghese and told him I feared what would happen in my country. He coolly and correctly told me: “Let’s just see how this all sorts itself out.” He calmed me, but I proceeded to send several cables to my elected representatives expressing anger and demanding action).

And now, in the administration of George Bush, we have the case of not-yet-Attorney General and close Bush associate Alberto Gonzales’ urgently rushing to visit a hospitalized and ailing then-Attorney General John Ashcroft to pressure him to sign domestic spying orders that some in the Justice Department (including, it turns, out Ashcroft) refused to approve. See this VIDEO HERE for full details.

Now there’s a new political development that spells trouble for Bush — not in the sense of impeachment but in terms of a steady virtual collapse of his administration’s credibility: the press is starting to ask Bush what he knew about that visit and when he knew it.

Josh Marshall has this video of Bush refusing to answer whether he ordered Gonzales and another close aide to visit Ashcroft. He writes: “The funny thing about this dodge is that the president is saying not only that the nature of the program is highly classified and must be kept secret, which may be true, but that his apparent order for Gonzales and Card to go squeeze the semi-conscious John Ashcroft is also highly classified and must be kept secret. Somehow I just don’t get that one. The president’s refusal to answer tells the tale. The president gave the order and even placed the call, as James Comey all but told us yesterday.”

Even worse, it’s now clear that the Washington Post thinks it smells a PRESIDENTIAL cover up. It wrote an editorial which seems to have the same feel as the ones written during Watergate. See All Spin Zone for full details and commentary.

The question we’ve posed to Democrats, Republicans and independents has been: Have we ever seen an administration like this? The answer seems to increasingly be…perhaps.

The question for Republicans of good conscience is: does this administration, by the way it operates, the way it treats other branches of the government, its attitude towards existing law and the kind of respect it shows for it, REALLY honor the values nurtured, cherished and safeguarded by such Republican Presidents as Dwight D. Eisenhower, Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan…and even the first George Bush?




This entry was posted on Friday, May 18th, 2007 at 7:06 am and is filed under U.S. Attorneys, MSM, White House, Scandals, Civil Liberties, Alberto Gonzales, George W. Bush, Republicans, Media, Law & Legal Matters. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.