A North Korean Speaks On the Protests Against American Beef Imports

July 9th, 2008
By WILLIAM KERN

Print Print

Once again, from the Daily North Korea of South Korea, an interview with someone who is said to actually live in the Hermit Kingdom. According to the newspaper, which is staffed in part by North Korean defectors, this member of the ‘North Korean Elite class,’ says he is fully aware of the mass protests in South Korea over U.S. beef, and in his words:

“I can speak not only for myself. No North Korean citizen, apart from on holidays, ever eats meat. When I see protests against the import of U.S. beef, I only wish it could be sent to the North.”

When the interviewer - clearly opposed to the protests over U.S. beef - asks what it would be like if a North Korean protested in such a fashion, the man, using the name An Chul-jin, replies:

“I can’t even imagine a citizen beating an agent of the People’s Safety Agency. Even if it’s just a verbal attack, such a person would be automatically sent to the Labor Training Corps. As a consequence, citizens never speak out against them, even if the agent is at fault. If they physically assault an agent, they are taken to a reeducation camp. They’re the ones with the power, so citizens are automatically captured, and sometimes subject to terrible acts.”

By Jung Kwon Ho

July 8, 2008

South Korea - The Daily North Korea - Original Article (English)

Dandong, China: On July 3, the Daily NK published the contents of a letter about the candle-light vigils over U.S. beef in South Korea, written by a North Korean citizen under the pseudonym An Chul-jin . The letter indicated that the vigils, which have been going on for over two months, have caused deep concern in North Korea.

Believing that there’s an interest in the views of North Korean citizens regarding the nationwide confusion over the portests, the Daily NK sought an interview with the writer of the letter. The request was granted and the interview took place in Dandong, China, just across the border with Shinuiju, North Korea, on the afternoon of July 6.

The following is the interview with An Chul-jin, who belongs to the elite-class of North Koreans.

Daily NK: We know that the food crisis in North Korea is severe. What is your reason for taking an interest in the South Korean “beef issue?”

An Chul-jin: Since coming here to China, I have seen the candlelight protests on South Korean TV almost every day. It’s hard to say that I can speak on behalf of all North Koreans, but while watching the candlelight protest campaign, my thoughts are that South Korea is not a completely realized democratic society. Rather, it is a country in a transitional stage of development.

Daily NK: Why are you concerned about South Korean society and why do you have such concern over its state of progress?

An Chul-jin: In North Korea, a majority fall into the poverty-level class. All products used by ordinary citizens are made in China. Accordingly, the sense of expectation about China is high. We also have great expectations about South Korea. On the economic and ethical fronts, we think South Korea surpasses China.

In an entire year, a North Korean worker earns less than a single month’s salary of a South Korean. Yet when I see the image of South Korean people fighting every day, it almost seems as though South Koreans don’t appreciate such an abundant society.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with contuning foreign press coverage of the South Korean protests against American beef.




This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 9th, 2008 at 10:22 pm and is filed under Human Rights, Death, Freedom of the Press, Communism, TV, Death Penalty, Food Shortages, Famine, Foreign Policy, Law Enforcement, Democracy, Health, North Korea, Original Reporting, Freedom of Speech, Health Care, Foreign Politics, Social Commentary, Media, Law & Legal Matters. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.