« The 71-Year-Old Candidate & His 100-Year War: Is McCain Totally Right In the Head?
Talking about talking about race relations »



The Olympic Torch Fiasco

April 7th, 2008
By POLIMOM

Print Print

This is outrageous:

The torch was being carried by a wheelchair athlete when it was halted and extinguished for a second time due to demonstrators shouting, according to AP. Backup flames, also lit from the birthplace of the ancient games in Olympia, Greece, are with the relay at all times to relight the torch.

Earlier protesters close to the River Seine forced authorities to put the torch out and take to a bus so they could continue the relay.

Agencies report that the relay has now resumed but that there have confrontations between the authorities and demonstrators. Police have taken numerous protesters away, AP said, also using tear gas to remove demonstrators who lay in the road and tried to block the relay route.

The torch had to be taken from a wheelchair athlete to protect it? The police are using tear gas???

Whatever it was the IOC thought they were doing 7 years ago when they awarded the 2008 Summer Games to Beijing, it’s clearly backfiring.

I’m curious about what you think of all this. Are the protesters harming or helping? Is this the right venue for objections to Chinese governmental abuses?

I’ve written more about the disastrous Olympic Torch relay at my own blog, here.



This entry was posted on Monday, April 7th, 2008 at 6:58 am and is filed under Human Rights, China. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 6 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    I think these protests are out of place and ill-conceived. The athletes competing in the games and the people chosen to carry the torch during the relay are not involved in politics and have no decision-making abilities when it comes to international diplomacy. The purpose of the Olympic Games is to celebrate athletic prowess and foster a sense of friendly competition between individual athletes, teams, and nations. Using an event that is meant to highlight something that is good in this world to air grievances seems mean-spirited, especially the way these protestors are doing it.
    • ^
    • v
    As far as protests go, I think this is actually quite effective. The Olympics are being used by China to legitimize their government on the world stage, so it's only natural that there is a backlash. If the Olympics were being held in the US, I would welcome Iraq war protests of this nature.

    Better this than riots.
    • ^
    • v
    The question is how else is the message going to get out that there is great popular opposition to China and support for Tibet? Even though it is disruptive, this form of protest is comparatively peaceful. I don't think there is any other way to effectively, and peacefully actually physically show China that while world governments are willing to look the other way, or maybe even chide China by their leaders not attending, a large segment of the world population will not stand idly by.
    • ^
    • v
    I am sympathetic with the protesters against China's actions in Tibet, Darfur, etc. But they cross an important line when they use force against innocent participants in the torch procession. Gandhi had it right about peaceful demonstrations - the moral majority is not attracted to replacing one belligerent gang with another.
    • ^
    • v
    "The purpose of the Olympic Games is to celebrate athletic prowess and foster a sense of friendly competition between individual athletes, teams, and nations."

    I agree which is why I don't think the games should be boycotted.
    ___

    "Using an event that is meant to highlight something that is good in this world to air grievances seems mean-spirited, especially the way these protestors are doing it."

    That's partially true- the Olympics also put a spotlight on China and they are able to show the world what a fabulous country they are.... except they're not all that fabulous- there are HUGE concerns- environmental, human rights abuse, Darfur (which is human rights combined with economic bullying and environmental issues), etc. So if the Chinese want to show the world that they are a great country, let the world also see that China has an absolutely horrible record in other areas as well. If China wants to present a sterling image to the world, then they can- as soon as they clean up their huge problems. China can't get a free pass.

    I agree with Paul Silver... to an extent. I don't think there should be force by the torch protesters and I don't think the flame should be extinguished. But the Olympic games are as much a political event as an athletic event and I don't consider the participants in the procession to be innocent. If the participants really think the torch relay isn't political then that just shows that they are naive. But regardless of whether they are naive or not... I still do not believe in violence against them or the torch.

    On a personal note.... when the torch comes to SF I'm going to be one of those protesters. There are various groups organizing protests to advance their causes, which I think is neat. But I'm going to be at the Darfur one (since there are many issues around Darfur). Hopefully I won't be caught up in any violence.

    But the bottom line is that China has horrible, horrible human rights abuses and other issues. The Chinese government can't control and censor the world media (like they do in their own country) and claim that those problems don't exist.
    • ^
    • v
    Go Team USA!
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« The 71-Year-Old Candidate & His 100-Year War: Is McCain Totally Right In the Head?
Talking about talking about race relations »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.