Infidelity: An American Social and Political Obsession

May 4th, 2008 by WILLIAM KERN

If one wanted to know the difference between being an American and being a European, this article from France’s Le Figaro newspaper would be a very good place to start.

From Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky to client number nine Eliot Spitzer and ‘Kristan,’ Europeans have looked at the effect that sex has on American politics with a collective shake of the head.

In discussing the first press conference of New York’s new governor David Patterson, Pascal Bruckner writes for Le Figaro:

“A few weeks ago when the new Democratic governor of New York, David Patterson, a blind man, succeeded the once-incorruptible Eliot Spitzer who was found guilty of frequenting call girls, what did he do first? He called a press conference to confess to having cheated on his wife several times with colleagues from his office. … This stupefies Europeans, who still remember the outrageous Lewinsky affair: instead of announcing his political program, here is an official repenting out of fear that his exploits will one day be exposed to the public. In short, the world’s leading power, which is currently losing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which has revived the practice of torture and twice in-a-row elected one of the most incompetent heads of state in modern times, is up in arms over these measly tales of sleeping around!”

Bruckner goes on to recommend:

“Americans should be urged to take lessons in civilization from the old world: on this side of the Atlantic, as shown in cinema, literature and theater, everyone cheats and is cheated on, and people survive the infidelity of their partner. Real fidelity is more demanding than a strict physical abstinence, and if the love is strong, it will overcome these episodes.”

By Pascal Bruckner

Translated By Kate Davis

April 30, 2008

France - Le Monde - Original Article (French)
A few weeks ago when the new Democratic governor of New York, David Patterson, a blind man, succeeded the once-incorruptible Eliot Spitzer who was found guilty of frequenting call girls, what did he do first? He called a press conference to confess to having cheated on his wife several times with colleagues from his office.

His wife, in turn, acknowledged some escapades of her own, and swore that she and her husband had overcome these challenges. This stupefies Europeans, who still remember the outrageous Lewinsky affair: instead of announcing his political program, here is an official repenting out of fear that his exploits will one day be exposed to the public. In short, the world’s leading power, which is currently losing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which has revived the practice of torture and twice in-a-row elected one of the most incompetent heads of state in modern times, is up in arms over these measly tales of sleeping around!

What’s going on when the entire press, from the gutter papers to the very serious New York Times, covers this private matter ad infinitum? Let us recall the disappointments of former Democratic Governor Eliot Spitzer: a destroyer of financial corruption and a champion of the fight against prostitution, he himself frequented a ravishing 22-year-old brunette, Ashley Youmans, alias Kristen, for whose services he was paying between $1,000 and $5,000, drawing on, it seems, money from his campaign fund.

Here again, nothing out of the ordinary for an old European with broad experience in the unpredictability of human nature: like Captain Haddock , blind drunk and chairing a meeting against alcoholism, the fathers of modesty in the United States, the enemies of vice, of feminism and of the freedom of morals, invariably end up in the arms of prostitutes, their nostrils filled with cocaine and their hands in the safe. Every moralist eventually ends up falling one day into the sin he denounces: isn’t the Catholic Church itself, which advocates chastity and subjects homosexuals to public obloquy, covering up the actions of thousands of pedophile priests who rape and abuse children?

The first lesson from old Europe: Beware of any virtuous discourse. Eros takes revenge on her critics and delivers a formidable kick in the nose to the prevailing Puritanism. What should we think about these American family therapy associations that explain that “the reactions of a betrayed wife resemble the symptoms of post-traumatic stress shown by the victims of traumatic events,” like September 11, 2001? What can be said about the seminars for unfaithful spouses who are reeducated like dissidents in the former Soviet empire?

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing translated foreign press coverage of the United States.

This entry was posted on Sunday, May 4th, 2008 at 3:43 pm and is filed under Homosexuality, Moral Values, Women, Moral Decline, Law Enforcement, Newspapers, The New York Times, Prostitution, Eliot Spitzer, Newsweek Blogitics, Corruption, Hypocrisy, Popular Culture, Women's Issues, Europe, Quotes, Politics, Law & Legal Matters, History, Sexuality, Media Criticism, Embarrassment, Columnists, France, Social Commentary, Crime, Literature. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

The Standards Of A Free Press »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.