« Quote Of The Day: On Obama, Al-Maliki And McCain
Americans For ‘Incredible India’ »



Jesse Helms’ myths. The party was right before it was wrong.

July 19th, 2008
By JOE WINDISH, Technology Editor


Facing South says the collective reaction to Jesse Helms’ death speaks volumes about the state of race relations and social progress in our country. They set the record straight in three myths about Jesse Helms (and what they say about us):

To say Sen. Helms held deep prejudices against many — especially African-Americans and gays and lesbians — isn’t a matter of opinion; it’s all part of the historical record. As Gary Robertson of the Associated Press reported, Helms — unlike other hold-overs from the segregationist era — never changed his views in opposing civil rights. Up until his last Senate campaign, stirring up racial division — along with homophobia and anti-communism — was a centerpiece of Helms’ political M.O.

As the quintessentially-establishment columnist David Broder noted upon Helms’ retirement in 2001, the senator who up into the 1990s was giggling at the word “nigger” and saying that “homosexuals are weak, morally sick wretches” was “the last prominent unabashed white racist politician in this country.”

They go on to point out that Helms was neither the “straight talker” nor the “unique iconoclast” he was made out to be.

It is a deep irony that many of the political leaders and media commentators who praise Jesse Helms’ “honesty” so readily trade in myths, rather than facts, in remembering his political legacy. In a year when many are wondering whether an African-American man can win the presidency, we clearly need more, not less, honesty in confronting the state of race and social progress in our country.

Meanwhile we’ve got “a long-time, regular, sensible caller” to The Michelangelo Signorile Show claiming in all seriousness that the late senator was a cross-dresser. And I can tell you from personal experience that I’ve witnessed stranger truths in my day.

But for those in need of documentary evidence, Martin Lewis has gathered quite a bit of it. Not about cross dressing, but about the odious bigotry and prejudice that made him unworthy of the accolades he received — some of it as recently as this week when Liddy Dole proposed naming an AIDS bill after him. (That earned her #3 in Keith Olbermann’s “Worst Person In The World” countdown.)

RELATED: Crooks & Liars on Dems, Republicans, and the ‘party of civil rights’ – read through to understand the final line, “Ultimately, this isn’t much of a campaign pitch: ‘Vote Republican: The Party Was Right Before It Was Wrong.’”



This entry was posted on Saturday, July 19th, 2008 at 3:36 pm and is filed under Homophobia, Integration, Republican Party, Sexism, Racism, Race, Republicans, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 2 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    It has beeen brought home to me with a bang over the course of this election how much we're NOT over our problem with race and other prejudices.
    There is no denying the progress that has been made: a black man is the presumptive nominee for one of the two mjaor political parties. Some blacks do well as Republicans; they no longer see the Democratic Party as the only choice.

    Simultaneously, however, there is an insistence, in some quarters, that the shortfalls never be mentioned or the past never be seen for what it was. When Jesse Helmes was eulogized, there were many references to his 'alleged" racism and prejudice against gays. That was so bizarre because Helmes himself never hid behind 'alleged'.

    It's not right to judge people of a previous time or generation for not having insights ahead of their time. Neither is it right to expect that nothing good can be said about someone who has/had objectionable traits. The problem can be easily solved by not talking about he negatives when you want to bring up the positives. But 'alleged'? That's a deception.

    I saw an article a few days ago about 'gay supremcy'. The same fear that elicits allegations that blacks are trying to 'take over', elicits accusations that gays are trying to destroy the lives of straights.

    We're looking at the same screen, but we're not seeing the same movie.
    And that's disturbing. Very disturbing.
    • ^
    • v
    There are still way too many in both parties who will only vote for a white Christian male. We have not overcome our issues on sex, race or religion--and it is a disgrace. Until we do, we are not truly a democracy.

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Quote Of The Day: On Obama, Al-Maliki And McCain
Americans For ‘Incredible India’ »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.