Please. Please Make It Stop. I Beg You.

November 9th, 2008
By JAZZ SHAW, Assistant Editor

Print Print

I sincerely hope that this purported Topeka-Capital Journal article is a hoax… somebody’s very poor idea of a bad joke.

Planning under way for Obama holiday

Plans are being made to promote a national holiday for Barack Obama, who will become the nation’s 44th president when he takes the oath of office Jan. 20.

“Yes We Can” planning rallies will be at 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. every Tuesday at the downtown McDonald’s restaurant, 1100 Kansas Ave., until Jan. 13. The goals are to secure a national holiday in Obama’s honor, to organize celebrations around his inauguration and to celebrate the 200th birthday of President Abraham Lincoln, who was born on Feb. 12 1809.

Here’s the short version of my response to this. We already have a holiday for Barack Obama. It’s called PRESIDENTS DAY.

This idea approaches criminal stupidity, and no matter how much you may have supported Obama’s candidacy, you should oppose it also. It’s not that I don’t “get” the symbolic importance and historic nature of electing our first president who isn’t a Rich Old White Guy. (ROWG.) I get it. Honestly I do.

The point is, we already have too many damned Federal holidays as it is and I’m always on the lookout to see if we couldn’t combine and reduce a few more. There are all too many days now when I can’t get my mail delivered, have my trash picked up, and I find the neighborhood littered with screaming children who bloody well ought to be in school.

Also, no matter how historic you feel the election was, we have had any number of presidents who were wildly popular in their own time and established admirable legacies which last to this day. Shall we give them all their own separate holidays? Let’s let the Obama administration play out. Something like this, if it is to be considered at all, should properly done by future generations in a posthumous honor after history has had it’s chance to evaluate the full term of his service and his lasting effect on the nation.

And let’s face it… how embarrassed would you be if you did manage to establish this holiday immediately and six years from now Obama got swept up in something like Watergate? (I know… I know… it would never happen. We’ve said that about plenty of politicians. Look how Grant’s presidency turned out and he was a war hero.)

If this story is real - and let’s all hope that it turns out to be a joke - let’s all compose ourselves and step back from the brink, shall we? Thank you. That is all. You may now return to your normal browsing.




This entry was posted on Sunday, November 9th, 2008 at 4:59 pm and is filed under Holidays, Barack Obama, Society. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 7 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    rallies at a downtown mcdonalds for breakfast and dinner?

    sounds like either a bad promotion, or a very bad racist joke
    • ^
    • v
    I doubt the guy behind this is kidding. I also think he's nuts. The idea is just so ludicrous that it just shouldn't be taken seriously by anyone but some fools will.
    • ^
    • v
    unclejoe40: rallies at a downtown mcdonalds for breakfast and dinner?

    Exactly. You'd think they'd at least find a Starbuck's or an Applebees or something. Also, I'm guessing that if you have more than 100 or so people in Topeka inclined to hug a tree, a line is almost certain to form. I'm just sayin'.
    • ^
    • v
    Well this is so silly.

    I think the leadership void in this country was so deep that a gifted leader like Obama is being deified-- which places a really unfairly high burden of expectations on his shoulders.
    • ^
    • v
    Jazz, what makes you think this is an Obama fan, it could also be a wingnut wackjob plant, just like Obama is a Mooslim.

    I wonder if this supposed story is a plant by a REAL wacked out wingnut. A Google search shows little results for Obama and Reagan being added to Mt. Rushmore. If the story is a Jim Cates plant, the Dutch lad and other at Memo will fall victim to this viral BS. Cates has an add at the Topeka paper, I doubt if he's part of AirAmerika. I wonder how many liberal newspaper exist in Topeka?
    • ^
    • v
    Yeah, we also have Washington's b'day as a holiday of some sort. Jazz, when you first said that we already had a holiday to celebrate this I thought you were going to say, "Martin Luther King's Day".

    This sounds like a McDonald's promotion....

    I'm all for honoring our nation's heros, but this is too early. While I don't mean to minimize the importance of his historic win but Obama should actually be a sterling president for a couple terms before we start naming a new holiday after him. Come to think about it, maybe the national holiday we already have to honor Obama's triumph isn't President's Day or MLK Day, but Fourth of July, since we are returning our country to a leader who will (I assume) uphold the US Constitution, since that is something Bush was serially unable to do, at least when it came to his own interests and the interest of his cronies.
    • ^
    • v
    I don't disagree that such a notion would be just....nuts...There are some details about this article which are a bit iffy from my vantage point as a "local"...

    ~ Kansas Ave, NW (which eventually becomes Kansas Ave. NE) starts in the Petworth neighborhood of DC and runs to the DC-MD border (it then becomes Kansas Ln.). Most people living around here would call that nowhere near Downtown DC.
    ~ There's no 1100 Kansas Ave. The building numberings on Kansas Ave. start somewhere in the 3600's-3700's and go upward going toward the state line, not downward.
    ~ There's no McDonald's location on Kansas Ave (NW or NE).

    Reading this, I lean more towards "hoax" than fact (though I wouldn't put it past a handful of people to try to do it).

    ~S~
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.