« A Cleveland Grilling
Odes to William F. Buckley … »



Health Insurance Answers Depend on What Question We Ask

February 27th, 2008
By BRIDGET MAGNUS

Print Print

This election season we have heard a lot about “health care reform” and “health insurance reform”. Senator Clinton and Senator Obama have been sparring over the issue most of the month. On the other side of the aisle, Senator McCain has also had to address the issue of health care. Everyone agrees we have a “problem” when it comes to health care and health insurance, but there are wildly varying opinions about what should be done.

We all know that almost 47 million Americans do not have health insurance, and that this number has risen every year since 2001. That’s roughly one out of every 6 people. That is a problem for our workforce because we have workers who may put off or simply not seek medical care, to say nothing of the increased havoc that an epidemic or pandemic might cause in the absence people seeking timely, affordable health care. This is also a problem economically because somebody has to pay the hospital bills when the uninsured become so sick they can no longer avoid the doctor, and because medical expenses are a leading cause of bankruptcy.

So an obvious question to ask is “Why don’t these 47 million people have health insurance?” And there’s a quick, easy, wrong answer: since we also all know that in the United States, most people who have health insurance get it through their employer, there must be a lot of employers who are not providing health insurance to their employees. There’s a germ of truth here: “As costs climb, the number of firms offering health insurance falls. The study found that while 98% of firms with more than 200 workers still provide some sort of employee health benefits, only 60% of smaller companies do.” So the obvious answer — endorsed by Clinton and Obama and Romney and Schwarzenegger to name just a few — is to mandate that your boss get you into a group health insurance plan.

What? Do I hear laughter? That must be from the 4.9% of you who are unemployed, and this is the first good laugh over health insurance you’ve had since getting that sick joke known as a COBRA notice. Or maybe you are one of the 20 million self-employed. Or maybe you are a child. After all, children don’t have employers.

So again the obvious but wrong answer is to mandate all these people obtain coverage for themselves. Oh, and for their children. But this ignores all the other possible answers to “Why don’t these 47 million Americans have health insurance?” If we start looking for other answers, we might hear about skyrocketing premiums for declining benefits; we might learn about people with pre-existing conditions and people who avoid medical tests for fear of uncovering one; we might meet people who had health insurance — until they actually got sick and needed it; we might be saddened to learn about people who died because a paperwork mistake meant they didn’t have the insurance they needed.

Sure, we could have some sort of pool where people who don’t have employer-provided health insurance could buy coverage. But almost none of the plans being circulated would do a thing to make insurance companies cover people who actually need health care at reasonable prices. Our candidates instead ask us to line up and make sure these for-profit insurance companies get their premiums every month.

Most Americans believe we need radical change in the way we pay for medical care; most candidates are offering us bandages for a broken system.



This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 27th, 2008 at 4:50 pm and is filed under Health Care, Health, 2008 Elections. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 4 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    A very accurate assessment, Bridget. Conservatives say they want to break the job/insurance link by creating a system that allows everyone to buy their own insurance. First, I have yet to see a proposal from them that would actually accomplish this for those who have problems in the existing system. In addition as you noted it completely ignores that inconvenient fact of life called unemployment even as reports show that the length of time that many people who lose their jobs spend unemployed is getting longer.
    • ^
    • v
    As a conservative from a different country, I do not understand the irrational antipathy of American conservatives for socialized medicine.

    Yes, it is often inefficient and bureaucratic. But it is the one great achievement of the welfare state...and still more efficient by all measures than the costly American system.

    This is a very sad post, really. It is hard to look upon the present state of affairs in the US in this regard, as Bridget lays it out, without sadness at the human toll.
    • ^
    • v
    Our candidates instead ask us to line up and make sure these for-profit insurance companies get their premiums every month.


    Bridget is completely right.

    And the only thing I can add to Macan's comment is this: do you really think your private insurance carriers are more efficient or less bureaucratic than than the government is?
    • ^
    • v
    The posting is disingenuous because it kept using the term Health Insurance when it really meant health costs. When discussing health plans there is no discussion of actuarial issues, grouped risks, or out year costs. Instead, the proposed health plans are just a means of asking everyone to pay for collective medical costs,. The usual means of collectivizing costs is the proposalthat taxpayers pay the health costs of those who do not pay taxes. Thus, wage earning middle class Americans will pay more taxes so that tax cheats, non-working 20 somethings, and others do not have to contribute to their own health costs.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« A Cleveland Grilling
Odes to William F. Buckley … »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.