« This is sexist? Really? For real?
Gallup Poll: Obama Opens “First Statistically Significant Lead” Against Clinton »



Faded Red

February 16th, 2008
By DAVID SCHRAUB, Assistant Editor

Print Print

Honestly, what’s the world coming to when “Socialized Medicine” doesn’t scare people anymore?

Incidentally, the first time I ever heard the term “socialized medicine”, it was in a text book discussion of the Polio Vaccine — specifically, where Eisenhower-era Republicans objected to distributing the vaccine for free on that grounds. So that may be why I don’t find the term as scary as most.



This entry was posted on Saturday, February 16th, 2008 at 4:30 pm and is filed under Health Care, Health. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 3 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Count me among those who welcome "socialist" ideas to be considered with other ideologies in an open minded discussion of pragmatic choices.

    Socialized medicine works well in the UK. It started off awkward and then Margaret Thatcher, and the team of Gordon Brown and Tony Blair refined it. Thatcher had been quite proud of how low was the percentage of GDP that Health care represented as compared to the US.

    In the larger challenge of managing the exploding costs of entitlements these kinds of practical solutions are a path to success. With a single payer health care system we can streamline Medicare, Medicaid, Worker's Compensation, Disability, and adjust the expenses to target medical care rather than administration, redundancy, marketing and profit.
    • ^
    • v
    Great news that the profit-driven rhetoric against universal health care is losing its punch. "Socialized medicine" is a false bogeyman that distracts us from the core problem: We want efficient, cost-effective and universal access to health care for all American citizens. We want doctors and patients to make health care decisions, not insurance company meddlers, intent on maximizing profit by reducing coverage.

    The 800 pound gorilla in the mix? 35% insurance company profit and "overhead," more than enough to cover everyone currently without access. A single payer system like Medicare costs under 5% to run (no profit, no advertising, no obscene CEO salaries), and gets payment in the hands of physicians without haggling or endless obstruction by people whose jobs are to prevent, rather than make, payments.
    • ^
    • v
    One of the lines used to horrify people with the thought of government involvement was how individual choice would be eliminated by the government. People by now have realized that private insurance companies limit your options just as much as government ever would. Frankly, I've dealt with private insurance and the government plans when I had to put my mother into a nursing home. The government was no worse and in some ways superior to the private companies.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« This is sexist? Really? For real?
Gallup Poll: Obama Opens “First Statistically Significant Lead” Against Clinton »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.