Why Madame Bovary Is Not a Feminist Icon

April 9th, 2007 by SHAUN MULLEN, TMV Columnist

bovary02.jpg

As well read as I have been over the years, including many of the classics of Western literature, I have just gotten around to reading Gustav Flaubert’s Madame Bovary.

How to account for this gaping hole in a bibliographic odyssey that has included a thousand or so books over four or so decades? I dunno. Maybe I thought this particular classic was a Doctor Zhivago without the snow.

Boy was I wrong.

Emma Bovary is in some respects the prototypical “Desperate Housewife,� a manic depressive spendthrift with eating and panic disorders who makes her life into a novel to escape the emptiness of her existence in rural France.

But like many great books, the message that I took from Madame Bovary resonates even more powerfully today than when Flaubert introduced it in the mid-19th century to a public alternately titillated and shocked by its sexual innuendo.

For me, that message is that there is no lonelier a woman than one who demeans her sex but uses it to get special favors.

Please click here to read more at Kiko’s House.

This entry was posted on Monday, April 9th, 2007 at 1:35 am and is filed under Gender, Books. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

9 responses about “Why Madame Bovary Is Not a Feminist Icon”

  1. Dave Schuler said:

    I read Madame Bovary more than 40 years ago so my recollections are rather dimmed with time.

    I didn’t care for the book. I found Emma Bovary tedious, a character that existed solely to fulfill the literary intentions of the author—a critique of the literary and dramatic conventions of his day. Perhaps a shallow reading but there you have it.

    And my favorite character in Anna Karenina was Levin, too.

  2. Dave Schuler said:

    BTW, Doktor Zhivago isn’t Doctor Zhivago. If you haven’t read the book, it’s well worth it.

  3. domajot said:

    I read the book so long ago that probably a rereading is due.

    I’ve never thought that feminism, per se, was the central theme. All the characters, not just Emma, are flawed and cought in a web of pretentions. I believe
    a central theme was the bourgeois class, and how they knew enough to aspire to something higher but didn’t know enough to fulfill their aspirations.
    The feminist angle could be in Emma’s rejection of her daughter, as a son would have had a better chance to escape the trap of rural bourbeois life. Remember that sex was the only currency available to Emma.

  4. Shaun Mullen said:

    Domajot:

    You are quite right that sex was, in effect, Emma’s ticket out of the ghetto.

    My motivation for blogging on the book was two-fold: A break from using the words Bush and Iraq and an opportunity to examine whether the deep thinkers who believe that Emma for a feminist harbinger were right. As I note, if that is so she’s a lousy role model.

  5. domajot said:

    Shaun-

    I’ve never heard Emma being proposed as a role model. I have no idea what feminists say, but if they characterize her at all, I’d guess it would be as a victim, not a role model.

    In depictions of social classes, personal responsibility as an idea seldom plays a large role. The characters are usually portrayed as symptoms more than individuals.

    This is totally off the cuff, and I’m vulnerable to being proved wrong by a more scholarly examination.

  6. Shaun Mullen said:

    Domajot:

    Scholar schmolar. As alluded to in my previous comment, my post was in part an excercise in myth debunking. Scholarly myth debunking. I’ll take off the cuff over scholarship any day when it comes to stuff like this.

  7. stevesh said:

    Don’t forget Karenina, either. Magnificent. Very sad, and the fella’s not so noble.

  8. Rob Lll said:

    Fabulous book and an astute post, Shaun. I think a larger conclusion to be drawn is that great works of literature by and large don’t lend themselves to reductive, ideologically-driven readings, which must surely frustrate ideologues both left and right. I can’t imagine exactly what Flaubert would say about attempts to appropriate Emma as a feminist icon (either as heroine or victim), but I doubt that it would be very respectful.

    Flaubert is a big favorite of mine and I would also recommend “The Sentimental Education” (which I like even better than MB) and his novella “A Simple Heart” . The latter is one of the most tender and compassionate stories you’ll read, perhaps surprisingly so given how often Flaubert is characterized as “cold”.

  9. Rob Lll said:

    Fabulous book and an astute post, Shaun. I think a larger conclusion to be drawn is that great works of literature by and large don’t lend themselves to reductive, ideologically-driven readings, which must surely frustrate ideologues both left and right. I can’t imagine exactly what Flaubert would say about attempts to appropriate Emma as a feminist icon (either as heroine or victim), but I doubt that it would be very respectful.

    Flaubert is a big favorite of mine and I would also recommend “The Sentimental Education” (which I like even better than MB) and his novella “A Simple Heart” . The latter is one of the most tender and compassionate stories you’ll read, perhaps surprisingly so given how often Flaubert is characterized as “cold”.

Public Opinion »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.