A Latte Big Changes In Store At Starbucks

March 19th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

starbucks_logo.gif
Starbucks junkies take note: battered by a bad economy, competitors such as McDonald’s and Dunkin Donuts now selling designer coffee blends and a decline in its stock value, there are a latte grande changes brewing at Starbucks.

It’s enough to make you flip your frappuccino:

The initiatives are designed to restore an authentic coffeehouse experience to the company’s stores and, in turn, re-energize an ailing stock that has lost half its value in the past 15 months.

Before 6,000 investors, employees and analysts at the company’s annual shareholder meeting, the chief executive, Howard D. Schultz, unveiled an improved automated espresso machine that grinds coffee for each drink and has a lower height — so customers can see baristas making their beverages. He said the company would roll out the Swiss-made Mastrena machines to three-quarters of Starbucks stores by 2010.

Mr. Schultz also announced the company’s acquisition of Coffee Equipment Company, the four-year-old Seattle-based maker of the Clover coffee brewing machine, which brews one cup of coffee at a time. The price was not disclosed. The company will roll out Clover systems to select markets.

The New York Times also notes some other big changes, such as:

–A “pungent” new coffee blend.

–Partnership with Conservation International to certify environmentally sound coffee beans.

–A rewards card for customers who have Starbucks cards. This includes being able to customize your own coffee (adding vanilla, soy etc) for free.

The Times notes the challenge facing the over-expanded company:

The company faces a hurdle that may be impossible to overcome in the short term: the economy. Will penny-pinching Americans, in the steely grip of a recession, still pay $4.10 for their daily dose of white chocolate mocha?

And you can tell how big the challenge is by this lead in the USA Today story:

The company faces a hurdle that may be impossible to overcome in the short term: the economy. Will penny-pinching Americans, in the steely grip of a recession, still pay $4.10 for their daily dose of white chocolate mocha?

The text of the announcement is here.

But the plans — and announcement are unlikely to provide an immediate fix. The initial response on Wall Street was what Starbucks’ coffee never is: lukewarm:

Warning of an economic “tailspin,” Starbucks Corp outlined long-awaited plans to turn around its U.S. business on Wednesday, but details from new coffee machines to a rewards program for frequent customers failed to excite investors, who sent shares down 4 percent.
Chief Executive Howard Schultz told the company’s annual meeting there was no “silver bullet” for fixing Starbucks, whose stock has dropped 40 percent over the last 12 months.
The company’s blazing U.S. sales growth stalled in the most recent quarter, when a decline in traffic caused sales at domestic stores open at least 13 months to fall 1 percent — the first quarterly fall in company history.

Schultz returned as chief executive in January, promising to change what he had called the “commoditization” of the brand, but John Langston, a senior analyst at Hodges Capital Management, said he did not hear anything that made him want to buy the stock again.
“I didn’t really hear anything that blew my skirt up,” he said.

Part of the Starbucks reorganization also involves layoffs. Some 200 support employees who worked at the company’s headquarters and in the field will be given the ax and some 380 positions will remain unfilled — a total cutback of 600 jobs.

What’s behind the big announcement? According to reports, Schultz wants to get Starbucks back to basics — essentially selling the Starbucks experience. Drinking coffee at a donut shop or hamburger restaurant won’t be the same thing. This includes giving the shops feeling of small, intimate local places — but done in a way to help the company grow. Customers have reported a shift in many years — that Starbucks shops sometimes don’t feel as hometown and give off a corporate feel.

So now the company is trying to get back to basics, get back to the original feeling — and make Starbucks again a place where the experience of drinking a great (but costly) cup of coffee far more desirable than drinking it at a place with artwork of a smiling Ronald McDonald.

A PERSONAL NOTE TO STARBUCKS: I won’t be leaving you for hamburger or donut shops. A LOT of my posts on The Moderate Voice have been done from Starbucks over the years — places where they let me sit for a few hours and nurse cups of coffee. I recently redid my health insurance policy at a Starbucks on El Cajon Boulevard in San Diego. On year I traveled so much on I-5 that the Starbucks in Lebec — which employees told me was the heaviest visited Starbucks in North America — gave me a free cookie.

So I never noticed the corporate feeling. And I’ll ways be there for my business meetings, blogging when I can, and will order your quadruple frappaccino schmappaccino grande venti al dente –or whatever it’s called. Only at Starbucks. (And thanks for letting me sit there and write for TMV on your great Internet connections…)




This entry was posted on Wednesday, March 19th, 2008 at 9:05 pm and is filed under Corporations, Economy, Business. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 2 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    So, you write at Starbucks, drinking coffee concoctions. No wonder you produce so many interesting posts.

    Espresso doesn't do it for me. I'm a brew-of the-day, regular coffee guy. I love Starbuck's various rich, full-bodied and freshly brewed coffee blends, black with sugar only. t have always found Starbucks' places pleasant, if somewhat cramped. I don't think any has struck me as corporate.

    Starbuck's would do well to get its prices down a bit. While IMO its in a class by itself for always serving the finest coffee, its drinks and shops operate in a fiercely competitive, wide-open arena with many kinds of fast food, hot drinks and confection places.
    • ^
    • v
    1. Lower the prices somewhat (yes, indeed) or make the drinks stronger or larger.

    2. Add something to the company's reputation to capture self-indulgent, self-absorbed, faddish youth of all ages. Open a Starbucks on Hastings in downtown Vancouver -- if McDonald's can add this or that such as McSkillet Burritos or whatever other gimmick of the quarter it tries on the public, Starbucks could offer a little something extra at one of its stores in Vancouver -- something quite pungent, and compete with other establishments. That is, unless the locals have tired of the Cannabis Cafe.
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.