Obama and McCain: the necessity of rebuilding the nation

July 1st, 2008
By BRIJ KHINDARIA, International Columnist

Print Print

As Barack Obama and John McCain haggle over immigration and reasons for the energy mess, they are sticking their heads in the sand about the real problem.
That problem is the growing loss of faith among Americans in their ability to face the future as they struggle with consumer debt that has risen to $14 trillion from $8 trillion during George Bush’s sojourn in the White House.

The need now is not for slogans about hope or “Change we can believe in”. It is to rebuild the people’s ability to cope with changes and come out on top if possible.
This is not a Cassandra comment. The US may remain a global economic and military super power for a long time. But continuing to be rich and strong does not prevent foreign rivals from narrowing the gap or ensure that people will still have an “American dream” worth believing in.

The candidates have not yet given focused attention to the core problems of the vulnerability felt by ordinary citizens confronted by repeated domestic shocks and challenges to their way of life from rising foreign powers. This is compounded by the nation’s dilapidated physical infrastructure and malfunctioning financial, health and education systems.

These insecurities cannot be resolved without instilling new confidence in the people. Even if self-confidence improves, the gap may continue to narrow and that would of itself trigger massive shifts in the way that ordinary Americans live.

Such issues should be treated as top-drawer political questions instead of being placed on the back burner as longer term challenges compared with others seen as immediate concerns. Higher priority is necessary because the loss of confidence derives from the ordinary American’s fear of changes over which they and their government seem to have little or no control.

The causes of concern go far beyond such immediate issues as how to handle the Iraq war, slow down the flow of illegal immigrants, or soften the housing market’s gloom. In fact, the intensity of the immediate concerns indicates how far control of the country’s prosperity has slipped out of the hands of Americans and their government.

The immediate issues are surmountable. For instance, if the situation in Iraq becomes less hostile to the US, the media and politicians will put it on the back burner. If it worsens, whoever takes the White House in January 2009 will try to get out as soon as feasible.

If illegal immigration slows down, people will no longer harp on it. If the pace quickens, everyone will adjust to it because of the recognition that pushing immigrants out does not prevent them from returning so long as the economy needs their labor.

When home prices become low enough, buyers will seep into the market and banks will become less skittish because homes will once again have market value equal to or above the loan.

In each of these and other immediate issues, the cycles of fear sparked by 9/11 play significant roles that have amplified since. The oil crisis combined with the specters of simultaneous recession and inflation are the latest blows signifying to the persons-in-the-street how defenseless they are as they struggle to live the “American dream”.

This is a time when the Euro is threatening the dollar’s primacy and Europeans are trying to go their separate ways from Washington on critical economic and military matters. The BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – have increased their reserves ten-fold to over $3 trillion sending a clear signal that economic power is shifting towards them for the moment.

That moment might lengthen as the Middle East looks eastward for clients for its oil and financial investments instead of westward to the US, which treats them with suspicion bordering on resentment.

The fact is that American dominance of the world economy is no longer impregnable. That directly affects the livelihoods of almost all Americans. So far the candidates are looking away from this serious challenge.

The vulnerability is underlined by the mistakes made in Iraq and Afghanistan, perplexity regarding Iran and the increased danger for Israel. It is fed by the recent history of venality of respected companies starting with Enron and MCIWorldCom to the much admired financial giants currently hustling to cover losses.

Goldman Sachs said recently that another $65 billion may be needed in write-downs caused by incompetent risk-taking by financial institutions, in addition to the nearly $100 billion lost by them in the US and Europe during the past 12 months.

At the same time, the continuing impoverishment of many Katrina victims demonstrates not only White House confusion over a purely domestic tragedy but also the incompetence of US officials and the quarrels of local politicians. Those will continue after Bush is long gone.

Faced with such shattered icons, the feelings of incapacity are understandable. To dispel them requires much more serious thought rather than rousing catchphrases.




This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 1st, 2008 at 3:16 pm and is filed under Oil, Newsweek Blogitics, Blog Roundup, John McCain, Barack Obama, 2008 Elections, Europe, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 5 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Here's a name you might remember with respect to the foregoing concerns:

    Clinton...

    Elected President of the United States in 1992, and again in 1996, President Clinton was the first Democratic president to be awarded a second term in six decades. Under his leadership, the United States enjoyed the strongest economy in a generation and the longest economic expansion in U.S. history. President Clinton’s core values of building community, creating opportunity, and demanding responsibility resulted in unprecedented progress for America, including moving the nation from record deficits to record surpluses; the creation of over 22 million jobs—more than any other administration; low levels of unemployment, poverty and crime; and the highest homeownership and college enrollment rates in history. His accomplishments as president include increasing investment in education, providing tax relief for working families, helping millions of Americans move from welfare to work, expanding access to technology, encouraging investment in underserved communities, protecting the environment, countering the threat of terrorism and promoting peace and strengthening democracy around the world. His Administration’s economic policies fostered the largest peacetime economic expansion in history. Source: http://www.aarp.org/reinventing/bclinton.html
    • ^
    • v
    Urban planners have estimated nearly $1.3 trillion in infrastructure repairs are required in the United States. That means a lot of jobs and an improved ability to compete internationally. We HAVE to move forward on this or we will be in even worse shape down the road.

    Source
    • ^
    • v
    McCain has spent every day since April attacking Obama over everything. Obama has tried to address the issues but, McCain and the gop don't want to talk about them. Because they know two things.
    One, Bush has destroyed the country and the economy.
    Two, The gop has nothing to run on.
    They are trying to distract and run on wedge issues and all the usual garbage because they do not want to talk about issues knowing they and Bush destroyed everything!
    Bush had the treasury cleaned out by his cronies and stuck us with so much debt it will be impossible to really know the true damage until he is out.
    • ^
    • v
    Add to the scary economic picture the fact that oil may soon be sold in Euros instead of dollars. That will crush the already weakened dollar.
    • ^
    • v
    The housing market crisis is a major issue in the upcoming election. Both candidates are attempting to address the issue and differentiate their positions from one another. It kill some to think of having at least a 4 year extension of the current political policies. However, it is almost as scary to consider revisiting the Carter years that failed and left the country in a horribly weakened position. Obama has to start to articulate his positions more than just talking about 'change' and McCain has to go back to being a maverick rather than a Bush lackey so he can raise the funds to compete with Obama. Here's the side-by-side video Clash/Politics
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.