« What Does Obama’s Public Campaign Financing Opt Out Mean?
The Truth as Private Property »



McCain Repeats Opposition To Drilling In ANWR

June 19th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

800px-Polar_Bear_ANWR_9_1.jpg

Republican presumptive Presidential nominee Sen. John McCain has made it clear: although he has called for renewed offshore drilling as a way to help get America out of the energy crunch and has shifted his position on that — he is not dropping his opposition to drilling in ANWR:

Senator John McCain reiterated his opposition to drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge on Thursday, a day after his statement that he would be willing to “go back and look at it again” sparked speculation among both opponents and proponents of drilling that he might change his mind.

“My position has not changed,’’ Mr. McCain said here on his campaign bus.

“People have said to me, ‘I’m going to bring you new information about ANWR, how environmentally we can make it safe,’” he said. “I’ll be glad to accept new information but my position has not changed.’’

Mr. McCain did change his position this week by proposing lifting the moratorium on off-shore drilling – in which he was quickly seconded by President Bush – but he said his position on drilling the the wildlife refuge was unchanged.

[UPDATE: It turns out ANWR drilling would take about a decade to kick in and lower gas prices two cents per gallon….]

It’s actually a very smart position for McCain, going into the general election. It means he is not appearing to be Bush Lite on the drilling — taking a middle-stance between those who want unfettered drilling and always mention ANWR in the same breath and those such as Democratic presumptive Presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama who oppose drilling.

The issue is more complex than it may appear at first glance: despite a widespread perception that most Americans remain opposed to drilling in once-taboo areas, a recent Gallup poll found “57 percent of Americans would support drilling in the nation’s coastal and wilderness areas that are currently closed to exploration if it helped reduce gasoline prices and if the drilling was conducted under strict environmental controls,” US News reports.

But the wildlife refuge?

Those who oppose it have pointed to experts who say it would do little for a short or even long term fix, and mostly be a big, fat ladle of gravy handed over to the oil companies. Here’s one of the websites arguing against it. Some mainstream news media also reached the same conclusion — as you can see here and here.

“One reason why I’m now far more in favor of off shore drilling is the price of oil,’’ he said. But he said that he did not believe that the price was so high that he would reconsider his position on drilling in the wildlife refuge.

Bush and his talk show and web supporters have made ANWR a kind of rallying cry, but have been thwarted repeatedly. And to environmentalists, perhaps more than the thorny issue of offshore drilling, it has become a kind of line in the ice.

Add to that a slew of images of the preserve that are online — images showing pristine scenery and endangered Polar Bears — and it’s hard to believe any Republican who claims to be a descendant of conservationist President TR Roosevelt could ever advocate drilling there.

McCain often likes to paint himself as a modern day Teddy Roosevelt. And while he’ll take lots of heat for changing his position on offshore drilling, and will have environmental groups working against him, sticking with his position on ANWR will set him apart from both packs — and maintain some of the independent image he had that eroded as he has tried to please the GOP’s conservative base and show loyalty to George Bush.

McCain again when asked about changing his position:

“No, but again, if somebody says, ‘will you look at this information,’ that the guy stood up at the town hall meeting, `I know how you can make it environmentally and totally safe,’ I’ll be glad to look at that information,’’ he said. “I think it’s incumbent on me to review it. But I certainly haven’t changed my position.”

And unless he changes his position, his current position now puts him between the viewpoints of establishment Republicans (yes on offshore drilling and drill in ANWR) and most Democrats (no on offshore drilling and don’t drill in ANWR).

So McCain’s precarious political tightrope walk continues — shaky, but it continues..



This entry was posted on Thursday, June 19th, 2008 at 5:09 pm and is filed under Alternative Energy Resources, Gas Prices, Oil, Environmental Issues, Nature, Newsweek Blogitics, Republican Party, Democratic Party, John McCain, Environment, 2008 Elections, Energy, Democrats, Barack Obama, Republicans, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 1 Comment

    • ^
    • v
    McCain may be doing what's politically smart for him but he's misleading the public badly. If the oil compaies sre so eager to drill, why aren't they drilling all over the off-shore areas already open to them but unused?
    Neither have they prepared by investing in the ships, equipment and experts needed for drilling.
    It couldn't be that hey're waiting for taxpayers to foot the bill again, could it?
    Making hefty campaign contributions may be cheaper than getting serious about drilling, I guess.

    McCains charade may be a winner. But if voters fall for it, we'll all be the losers.
    We'll waste too much of scarce money on appearances while letting the chance of a lifetime slide by to finally get this country into the modern age of new energy realities.
    I have the same feeling and conviction as I did before the Iraq war, when I kept saying : don't do it, don't do it. We made a big mistake then, and I fear we'll make a big mistake now, by falling for McCain's antics.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« What Does Obama’s Public Campaign Financing Opt Out Mean?
The Truth as Private Property »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.