Who Tried to Kill Hamid Karzai? …

May 3rd, 2008 by WILLIAM KERN

Could the Northern Alliance - America’s allies who helped bring down the Taliban Government in 2001 and bring Hamid Karzai to power - be behind the brazen attempt on his life during a military parade last week?

This theory has been making the rounds in Russian circles and has been enunciated by analyst Pyotr Goncharov for Russia’s Novosti news service.

Goncharov writes in part:

“Who was behind the April 27 attempt on the life of the President of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai, and what did they have to gain? There are many possible answers … But it’s clear that the Taliban could not have mounted such an attempt without the help of “third parties.”

After explaining how Afghan history sheds light on this question, Goncharov writes:

“The Parliamentary opposition in the person of the United National Front, which for the most part represents the Northern Alliance, has accused Karzai’s government of incompetence … While the confrontation between Karzai and the former Northern Alliance is now fully exposed, Kabul is trying not to broach the painful issue. Karzai must have many questions for his national security apparatus in Kabul, staffed largely by ex-members of the Northern Alliance.”

Goncharov finishes off his analysis this way:

“Now comes the search for the perpetrators … Conducted by the perpetrators themselves …”

By Commentator Pyotr Goncharov

Translated By Igor Medvedev

April 29, 2008

Russia - Novosti - Original Article (Russian)

MOSCOW: Who was behind the April 27 attempt on the life of the President of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai, and what did they have to gain?

There are many possible answers to this question, as always happens in such cases. But it’s clear that the Taliban could not have mounted such an attempt without the help of “third parties.” It would be naïve to believe otherwise.

The operation in Kabul was literally copied from the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in October 1981 . The script was followed exactly: the timing - during a military parade; the executors - militants sent by the regime’s irreconcilable opponents. There operation had, however, its own purely Afghan features.

Just as a military band started playing the national anthem and soldiers began a 21-gun artillery salute, those gathered for the ceremony were attacked not only with light weapons, but with mortars. This from any point of view is quite a shock. Experts sat that no matter what caliber these mortars were, their appearance in such a carefully-guarded zone raises doubts about the competence of the regime’s security forces (assuming of course, that they weren’t directly involved). What kind of security is it, when the nation’s president is attacked in broad daylight by mortars and from all sides by small arms - and on Mujahedin Day, Victory Day for the jihad?!

For clues as to who is responsible for the assassination attempt, let’s recall a little history. In Kabul on April 27, there is an annual military parade to mark the Mujahedin victory in 1992 . The current year, the 16th anniversary of the victorious jihad and fall of Najibullah government coincided with the 30th anniversary of another major all-Afghan event - the 1978 Saur Revolution .

The Saur Revolution diverted Afghanistan onto an unexpected course. It’s obscure even now, thirty years later. Experts still argue about whether it was an absolute detriment or some good came of it. There are many experts and many opinions. The most common diagnosis is that Afghan society wasn’t ready for the radical reforms that were proposed by the People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan [communist]. These radical reforms failed to take account, first and foremost, of the traditions of Islam, which engendered sufficient resistance that ultimately yielded a civil war.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing translated foreign press coverage of the war in Afghanistan.

This entry was posted on Saturday, May 3rd, 2008 at 9:42 am and is filed under Muslims, Foreign Politics, Al Qaeda, Radical Islam, Taliban, Islamists, Terrorism, 9/11, War, Military, Afghanistan, Sunnis, Russia, Asia, Foreign Affairs. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Political donation’s best bang for the buck »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.