Bhutan Kingdom’s Tryst With Democracy

April 21st, 2007
By SWARAAJ CHAUHAN, International Columnist

Print Print

Bhutan_map.jpg

The isolated Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan, situated between India and China, began a big experiment towards ending a century of absolute monarchy and ushering in democracy. The country held a ‘mock election’ on Saturday, to be followed by the real thing in 2008.

One of the ironies in Bhutan is that it was the king himself, Jigme Singye Wangchuck, who pushed for democracy — apparently against the wishes of many of his people — before handing over the crown to his 26-year-old son last December, reports Reuters.

“Yet Bhutan, which has a population of 635,000 in an area about the size of the Netherlands, is still a desperately poor and deeply traditional place.

“Saturday’s mock polls are designed to teach voters and officials about the election process. Four mock parties are contesting, and have been given imaginary manifestoes.

“In 1972, when Wangchuck came to the throne as a 16-year-old boy, Bhutan had almost no roads, schools or hospitals.

“Today four-fifths of its children go to primary school, most have access to safe drinking water and life expectancy has risen to 66 years from less than 40.”

In another report The Telegraph reports: “Eight years ago they saw television for the first time. Seven years ago they got the internet. Yesterday, the citizens of the tiny time-warped Himalayan kingdom of Bhutan finally took a step closer to another feature of modern life: democracy.

“Also known as Druk Yul, or the Land of the Thunder Dragon, because of its violent storms, Bhutan is like a Shangri-la preserved by its hereditary monarchy.

“But perhaps strangest of all is Bhutan’s promotion of gross national happiness (GNH) as an alternative measure of development to gross national product. The term was coined by Bhutan’s previous king, Jigme Singye Wangchuck, in the 1970s and remains its most famous export.”

” ‘It’s an idea that’s catching on across the world: the importance of things like a sense of community,’ said Nicolas Rosellini, the United Nations resident co-ordinator. ‘But here in Bhutan, where there is genuine contentment, people want to know how democracy will fit in’.”

Further along the Himalayas, Nepal endured a decade of civil war and weeks of bloody street protests before it rid itself of its autocratic monarch last year. And here in Bhutan we see the King himself offering to surrender his powers to the people.

This is a welcome sign for India as its other two neighbours - Pakistan and Bangladesh - have opted for military dictatorship…and so has Myanmar (earlier known as Burma).

Ironically, the dictatorships are being reportedly supported by the US administration in the two Islamic Asian countries of Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Incidentally, Bhutan is a Buddhist country, while Nepal is a predominantly Hindu country.

For more on Bhutan please click here…

And for pictorial view…here…




This entry was posted on Saturday, April 21st, 2007 at 6:46 pm and is filed under Muslims, Foreign Politics, USA, Civil Liberties, The Netherlands, Pakistan, Islam, Foreign Affairs, China, Freedom of Speech, Asia, India, History. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.