Awarding the Olympics to Beijing: A Mistake that Keeps on Giving …

April 13th, 2008
By WILLIAM KERN


Guardian Unlimited, U.K.

After the failure of the 1980 U.S.-sponsored Olympic boycott, hadn’t the world learned its lesson about the ineffectiveness of such actions? According to this editorial from the Nederlands Dagblad, things have changed since then - not the least of which is the fact that unlike South Korea, which rapidly democratized in the run-up to the 1988 Games, Beijing has taken a different tack.

The Dutch newspaper opines, “Such wishful thinking has now given way to the harsh reality. Over the past decade, Chinese leaders have decided that capitalism and dictatorship make an excellent pair … The IOC’s pseudo religious rhetoric about the brotherhood of nations doesn’t work anymore, because that now equates with siding with the Beijing regime.”

And like the other editorial WORLDMEETS.US has translated from the Dutch, this one prominently mentions the Berlin Olympics in 1936 - perhaps evidence of some raw emotion that remains over that war, during which The Netherlands was invaded and occupied by the Nazis.

EDITORIAL

Translated By Jan de Nijs

April 9, 2008

The Netherlands - Nederlands Dagblad - Original Article (Dutch)
In 1936, the world discovered how dictatorial regimes can make political mileage out of organizing the Olympic Games. Even today, the muscular blond men in the movie Olympia (1938), a propaganda film by Leni Riefenstahl, present a perfect illustration of this point. Adolf Hitler exploited sports to further his racist ideology. Since then, the Olympic Movement has zealously fought to protect the Games from being politicized. This despite the fisticuffs in Mexico in 1968 , the terror in Munich in 1972 and the boycott of the Moscow Games in 1980.

[Editor’s Note: The author refers to the “Massacre in Tlatelolco” which took place during the approach of the 1968 Mexico City Games. Students, frustrated over a variety of injustices attributed to the authorities, held major demonstrations on the afternoon and evening of October 2, 1968, ten days before the opening of the Games. Most sources estimate that between 200 and 300 students were shot to death by police and military forces . The 1972 Munich Games saw the kidnapping and murder of Israeli athletes by Palestinian terrorists ].

The turning point came - or so it seemed - with the Los Angeles Olympiad of 1984. Because of the sale of television rights, those Games were such a huge success that ever-after, a boycott no longer seemed possible. And by focusing on large-scale commercialism, former IOC President Juan Antonio Samaranch managed to overshadow rampant corruption and nepotism, which was then conveniently forgotten.

[Editor’s Note: Although the author’s point is well-taken, because of the American-led boycott of the 1980 Moscow Games, the Soviet Union then led boycott of the 1984 Games, which caused 14 Eastern Bloc countries and Cuba and (but not Romania) to boycott the 1984 Olympics ].

With six months to go before the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, the situation continues unchanged. No country in the world is seriously considering a boycott of the Games. What has changed, however, are some of the surrounding issues.

When the IOC chose Beijing in the summer of 2001, although there were muted protests, most of the lights were green. The Cold War was over. More and more of the world was about to accept free trade. And it couldn’t be otherwise - or so people thought - since democracy would soon follow. Of course, China would use the Beijing Games to showcase its best behavior to the World. And hadn’t awarding the 1988 Olympics to Seoul resulted in the rapid democratization of South Korea? Optimism reigned and there seemed no obvious reason to deny the Olympiad to the world’s most populous country.

Such wishful thinking has now given way to the harsh reality. …

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing translated foreign press coverage of the torch controversy at it relates to the United States.

This entry was posted on Sunday, April 13th, 2008 at 2:04 pm and is filed under Communism, The Netherlands, Nazis, Human Rights, Newspapers, Capitalism, Hypocrisy, Tyranny, Ideologies, China, History, Sports, Europe, Political Cartoons, Cartoon Commentary, Freedom of Speech, Business. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


The Dalai Lama, Tibet and China - a non-violent alternative »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.