« Harvard Law Professor Fights Back Against RIAA
The 70th Anniversary of Kristallnacht »



Stop Scapegoating Black People for Proposition 8

November 8th, 2008
By JOE WINDISH, Technology Editor

Print Print

Yesterday People For the American Way’s president, Kathryn Kolbert, put out a statement on Blaming Black Voters for Prop 8 Loss is Wrong and Destructive:

The past 72 hours have brought an extraordinary range of emotions - great joy at the election of Barack Obama and defeat of John McCain, and sadness and anger at the passage of anti-gay initiatives in Florida, Arizona, Arkansas, and California. That sadness has turned to outrage at the speed with which some white gay activists began blaming African Americans - sometimes in appallingly racist ways - for the defeat of Proposition 8. This is inexcusable.

As a mother who has raised two children in a 30-year relationship with another woman, I fully understand the depth of hurt and anger at voters’ rejection of our families’ equality. But responding to that hurt by lashing out at African Americans is deeply wrong and offensive - not to mention destructive to the goal of advancing equality.

Before we give Religious Right leaders more reasons to rejoice by deepening the divisions they have worked so hard to create between African Americans and the broader progressive community, let’s be clear about who is responsible for gay couples in California losing the right to get married, and let’s think strategically about a way forward that broadens and strengthens support for equality.

Via Pam Spaulding who has gathered statistics and background. The statement should be read in its entirety. For more see also: Jeralyn@Talk Left, Ampersand@Alas, a blog and  Ta-Nehisi Coates.



This entry was posted on Saturday, November 8th, 2008 at 2:26 pm and is filed under Mormons, Family, Civil Liberties, Roman Catholics, Evangelicals, Moral Values, Latinos, Protesters, Gay Rights, Hypocrisy, Black/African-American, Homophobia, Sexism, Religion, Race, 2008 Elections, Politics, Sexuality, Society, Racism, GLBT Issues, Freedom of Speech, Minorities, Law & Legal Matters. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 7 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    PC reconciliation is always touching.

    The people have voted. If the law was _illegally_ passed (as is claimed by some in California), file a legitimate lawsuit. Lawsuits simply filed to try to get the law thrown out on by a judge's whim ought to be thrown out -- the lawsuits, that is, while the perps go to prison for it.
    • ^
    • v
    It's much more precise to blame the religious than just the Blacks. Since the AA community is very religious they can be lumped in there too. Don't forget the Mormons!!
    • ^
    • v
    I was going to say, here in Utah, the Mormon Church is crying about being the scapegoat. So I guess the AA and Mormons will have to fight for who's the real scapegoat.

    I didn't keep the article, but I read one where they interviewed a AA woman in LA who voted for Prop-8 on religious grounds. I thought it was ironic as not too many years ago there were segregationists using religion to justify their beliefs too.
    • ^
    • v
    Whatever else could be said, I think this outcome demonstrates that "left" and "right" are not unitary concepts. We like to try to condense them onto a flat page, or even a dichotomy on a single line, but that's not reality. Reality is multi-dimensional, with lots of shades of gray -- which is itself a concept which applies only to a single dimension. It's technicolor in the extreme.

    Let me also add that the individual dimensions that constitute the notion of "liberal" on the one hand or "conservative" on the other are not always orthogonal (i.e., independent) to each other. And even if they were they are not all equally potent at one time versus another in any one person's life. To think so robs reality of its true richness. And to build a coalition in such a way as to condense it into a dichotomy (which ultimately has to happen in any democratic, republic, or parliamentary system), one has to pay attention to all the details -- which variables are more important to which people and which are not; how do different variables relate to each other, and to what extent. Those are the kinds of things that cause the definition of "liberal" and conservative" to change over time -- and the coalitions that constitute each as well. Without properly identifying those things I argue that there could be no such thing as "soccer/hockey moms", or "security moms", or "Reagan Democrats", or "Obamacons".
    • ^
    • v
    I've been saying for awhile that many of "The Right" and "The Left" just don't get the black community. Many black folks are social conservatives and fiscal liberals. They have much more in common with white evangelicals than white non-church goers. If it wasn't for black folks loyalty to the Democratic Party because of the past, we would be constant swing voters.
    • ^
    • v
    I dont think people are scapegoating black people on prop 8, unless they dont understand the situ at root as a set of demographics of which people 'by race' are vote-counted a certain way. I, personally, find counting votes by race, useless in most contexts, because it doesnt get to the social, psychological, economic class, educational, religious beliefs of persons in that group... which are often quite diverse.

    Tyrone is accurate: blacks, and speaking for my own group, Latinos, (insofar as I can as just one person who travels a great deal and listens to many from my own heritage) are often religiously conservative and social-program supportive. It is likely that ANY group of persons voting to amend the constitution of Calif to ban gay marriage, has amongst them people who believe gays ought not exist, as well as people who want gays to have every right others enjoy. However, the deciding factor is probably dedication to certain religious beliefs, not race per se.

    I thought that the 'under 30' demographic, as reported, voting in huge numbers to not ammend the constitution and not ban gay marriage, was the most interesting outcome of the issue. Hopeful.

    It must be noted too, I think, that in the GLBT community, no one person can speak for all the others about the outcome of Prop 8. There too, there is a plethora of reactions, no monolithic one.

    just my two cents worth
    dr.e
    • ^
    • v
    I am so disappointed at the outcome of the vote. I was so for Obama and now to learn the AA community are a bunch of hypocrites. As a result, if the banning of affirmative action comes t o my state I will actively endorse it and help the campaign. I was so happy about Obama, but now when I look at him I am slightly disgusted. I know he didn't campaign for it, but he represents someone that finally got black people to vote and the result was good and ugly. I will never look at the AA community the same again.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Harvard Law Professor Fights Back Against RIAA
The 70th Anniversary of Kristallnacht »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.