Guest Voice: Huckabee’s Smart Strategy Is No Accident

December 22nd, 2007 by CAGLE CARTOONS

This is a Guest Voice column by Michael Reagan, Ronald Reagan’s oldest son, who is also a popular radio talk show host. Guest Voice columns do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Moderate Voice or its writers.

Smart Strategy is No Accident

Making Sense, by Michael Reagan

In addition to seeing Mike Huckabee suddenly surge in the polls, the nation is also witnessing some of the smartest campaign strategies any candidate has displayed in a long time. The former Arkansas governor has shown he can play the game with the best of them, and better than most.

Let’s start with the Huckabee Christmas commercial, obviously aimed at evangelical Christians who constitute more than 40 percent of Iowa voters. Huckabee not only preached a sermon to that choir of Iowa voters, he spoke in front of what appeared to be a cross that appeared prominently in the background above his shoulder.

It’s important to keep in mind that this TV ad did not occur in isolation — it was an obvious response to Mitt Romney’s brilliant speech on his faith given the week before — a speech that won almost-universal praise. If the Rev. Mike Huckabee wanted to be seen as the Christian candidate, it required a response.

That’s what the latest Huckabee Iowa TV ad was — a 28-second answer to Romney’s speech.

That ad, one of the most brilliantly conceived and executed commercials ever seen, attracted worldwide attention. And no matter how many denials he and his supporters offer, that was a cross in the background and it was no accident it was highly visible. Remember that nothing happens by accident in politics. When it comes to such campaign gimmicks as TV commercials, everything is planned, down to the last detail.

That is not in the background because it is a bookcase — it was there because part of it forms a cross, plain and simple — the rest of the bookcase simply fades from view. And you have only 28 seconds to discern the fact that the cross that looms so prominently is merely part of a larger object.

It was a subliminal message, just as it was a subtle way of telling voters, “I’m the Christian, Romney is the Mormon.”

While it may have been part of a bookcase shelf or, as some say, a window, it was there because Huckabee and his advisors wanted it there to remind voters in Iowa that the candidate is a real Christian candidate running for the Republican nomination — one who is not afraid to display his Christianity boldly in this secular age which scoffs at all religious beliefs.

There’s no doubt in my mind that Ed Rollins, his top campaign advisor, planned that ad. Ed Rollins is a political genius when it comes to those kinds of issues and he proved that when he worked so effectively to put my father in the White House.

Mike Huckabee won’t admit it, but that ad was carefully crafted, it was effective, and it was his answer to Mitt Romney’s speech,

It’s interesting to note how those in mainstream media, who have so much trouble dealing with the birth of Christ, went absolutely bonkers over someone saying that he is a Christian, that what we are celebrating on December 25 is the birth of Jesus Christ, and daring to wish his fellow Americans “Merry Christmas” instead of some innocuous muttering such as “happy holidays.”

In his ad, Huckabee was also challenging the media by rubbing his faith in their faces.

Huckabee did in 28 seconds what it took Mitt Romney much longer. That’s political genius at work.

Mike Reagan, the eldest son of the late President Ronald Reagan, is heard on more than 200 talk radio stations nationally as part of the Radio America Network. ©2007 Mike Reagan. Mike’s column is distributed exclusively by: Cagle Cartoons, Inc.

TMV Editor’s Note:
Here is the actual ad:

This entry was posted on Saturday, December 22nd, 2007 at 9:36 am and is filed under Mormons, Christians, Newsweek Blogitics, Primaries, Iowa, Mike Huckabee, Elections, Religion, 2008 Elections, Republicans, Mitt Romney, Evangelicals, Politics. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

7 responses about “Guest Voice: Huckabee’s Smart Strategy Is No Accident”

  1. pjacobsuk said:

    As a former news videographer, I can say with confidence that when you tape there are times a subject comes out with antlers from a background tree branch or a funny hat from the hood on a light pole. It just happens.
    I’ve just heard Huckabee’s description of the taping. It was taped quickly and at the end of the day and he was battling a throat infection. With that, I have no reason not to believe that that bookshelf (also being the whitest object in the background) became what the world was just dying to criticize -a Cross.
    I really don’t think Huckabee knew it would shine for the world to see. I seen weirder things happen.

  2. The Talking Dog said:

    Oh please… OF COURSE the cross is intentional (no matter how many shots it took to get it in there)! And we’re going to see more and more of this kind of ad. And that’s the way it is.

    What is remarkable is that, having created the golum/monster of activating the Christian right into the Republican Party mainstream, now that there is a genuine God’s honest Christian like Huckabee in there (a Baptist minister and everything, with a Bible College degree no less)… the main stream corporatists of the GOP (think the National Review and Wall Street Journal crowd) are absolutely APPALLED at the possibility of a Huckabee win! In their view, the whole point of activating the Christian right was to cynically exploit its disproportionate electoral power to advance their corporatist ends! A fake Christian like GW Bush who was really a corporate shill was just fine… but someone like Huckabee who thinks that Christ taught about helping the poor– even if it means raising the capital gains tax… well, the vapors don’t begin to describe their reaction!

    Injecting this kind of religion (and apparently a religious litmus test) into our public discourse is absolutely anathema to what the Constitution stands for… HOWEVER– it seems consistent with democratic values, as large numbers of people seem to think that this is o.k. (though until Huckabee, no one blatantly put it into a t.v. add before).

    Of course, given the mania over the steel columns that ended up forming a cross in the World Trade Center ruins (not to mention the Congress overwhelming passing a Christian country resolution recently), none of this is a surprise; it was only a matter of time before someone put not only Jesus, but the cross, directly into the political discourse of a campaign.

    Look: Romney’s speech was absolutely disgusting; let me not mince words. Quite contrary to doing what JFK did, and state that religious matters are PRIVATE– and have no place being litmus tests for public service or otherwise directly injected into the public sphere– Romney just tried to say YES THERE IS SUCH A RELIGIOUS LITMUS TEST… and me, being WHITE and sorta Christian should be good enough for the rest of you! Huck just trumped that… and said “I’m even Whiter and Christianer”.
    This is absolutely anathema to our Constitutional system… but its how its being played now.

    Again… the funniest part to me is how, having had people like Michael Reagan’s father activating this particular group into the party for the party’s own cynical corporate ends, now that decades later, a true believer is coming to the fore… they go absolutely crazy! It might be hilarious, if this particular group of cynical bastards weren’t currently in control of our country.

  3. Jim Satterfield said:

    I think it says all we need to know that this is considered the message to appeal to the GOP’s Christian base according to Reagan.

    It was a subliminal message, just as it was a subtle way of telling voters, “I’m the Christian, Romney is the Mormon.”

  4. Republicrat said:

    Gov. Huckabee has put the country on notice: He will run on who he is, and not run away from it. I haven’t heard any apologies yet on the pardons he gave.

    I agree with “Talking Dog” that National Review is appalled by Huckabee, since they’ve already endorsed Gov. Romney for the GOP nomination. But if on any given Sunday 40% of Americans attend church, and he can garner 2/3 of those votes, that’s a good start for next November’s election.

    As for the ad…

    For every person who reacted negatively to the Christmas ad, I suspect two reacted positively. It’s not just Christians saying “Merry Christmas” this year, and probably some of those even live in New Hampshire, where the ad ran. Ed Rollins coming to head the campaign was certainly Huckabee’s best Christmas gift this year!

    Say what you want. Huckabee is smooth, and he has enough positions that appeal to moderates (creative on immigration, believes in global warming, responsible taxation) that he could very well peel off enough votes to win the Big Chair.

  5. DLS said:

    For every person who reacted negatively to the Christmas ad, I suspect two reacted positively.

    Yes, and the quality as well as the quantity is higher. Plenty of us have no problem with the mainstream Religious Right and we recoil at the bigoted and hateful behavior by the Left directed at anyone who is religious (except black Baptists who vote reliably Democratic, or the Jewish votes for Democrats that are expected nearly as much).

    Huckabee is much less defective than either Giuliani or Romney, and has some positive things to offer (decent, normal) people. That is the key issue here.

  6. DLS said:

    the main stream corporatists of the GOP (think the National Review and Wall Street Journal crowd) are absolutely APPALLED at the possibility of a Huckabee win!

    Absolutely. The media are overwhelmingly liberal, but these two sources (and some others), which are conservative, are thorougly Northeastern-based establishmentarian. I bet many of them would love RINOs like Giuliani, Romney, or McCain, or Arlen Specter, etc. Don’t forget the vile behavior by the media in 1992 toward Perot on election night.

    What Huckabee said about exploitation of the Religious Right by the Republican Party (their votes are taken for granted; they’re allowed on the bus but never to have a say in where the bus is going) was absolutely correct.

    It’s so obvious even a non-religious guy, non-social-conservative like me can see what’s happening to them.

  7. DLS said:

    The Wall Street Journal is also bitterly opposed to third parties or independent candidates and to proportional representation. Is anyone surprised?

Bill Clinton: Hillary’s Political Boon Or Political Albatross? »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.