News Media Conventional Wisdom Shifting Fast On Hillary Clinton Chances

March 27th, 2008 by JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

_CC4D0B6F_E9FC_4EF5_B454_90169C65738C_.gif

New York Senator Hillary Clinton’s chances to get the Democratic party nomination have been described by the news media and new media in see-saw terms for months, but there now seems to be a notable shift in the media’s conventional wisdom: the perception is that she now has little chance of winning and that the race is basically over.

The Clinton camp totally rejects that view. And rival and front runner Senator Barack Obama would be guilty of political negligence if he assumed that was the case (”Assume” makes an “ass” of “u” and “me”). But you do now a see a clear shift in many analyses, the most recent in a Reuters piece that is at times blunt:

Somebody forgot to tell Hillary Clinton the Democratic presidential race is over and Barack Obama won.

Obama has captured more state contests, more votes and more of the pledged convention delegates who will help decide which Democrat faces Republican Sen. John McCain in November’s presidential election.

But Clinton, a New York senator who has flirted with disaster before in the back-and-forth nominating battle with Obama, shrugs off growing predictions of doom and still sees at least a narrow path to victory.

“I hear it in the atmosphere,” Clinton said of the increasingly loud chatter about whether she should drop out and let Democrats focus on the general election campaign.

“But the most common thing that people say to me … is ‘Don’t give up, keep going. We’re with you.’ And I feel really good about that because that’s what I intend to do,” she told reporters on Tuesday.

Reuters notes that media commentators and Obama supporters are certainly not included in that group and points to the Clinton camp’s meticulous and skillful use of conference calls to media types to get out the message that team Hillary ain’t gonna be going anywhere yet.

But Clinton needs almost everything to go her way in the next few months.

She had a setback last week when her push for revotes in Michigan and Florida failed. Her victories there did not count because the contests were not sanctioned by the national party. She also faced an uproar this week over her misstatements about coming under sniper fire on her arrival in Bosnia in 1996.

Reuters then outlines Clinton’s hurdles with Superdelegates.

Clinton says she has won more big, diverse states crucial to Democratic hopes in November like Ohio, New Jersey and California, proving her worth in a general election battle.

The longer she continues, the more chance Obama might slip up and make a mistake that turns the tide of the campaign. Clinton has made it clear she will not consider bowing out of the race until all of the states have concluded their voting.

At that point, Democrats hope, a winner.

And, in fact, it is worth to note:

–There is nothing illegal about Clinton carrying on her campaign. Or immoral. Or in political terms unethical. As a challenger she has a right to take it right up to the very last second that she is allowed at the convention.

–If she wins big in Pennsylvania (as expected) it would enhance her image. But she will also need to win big in North Carolina and yet another poll shows Obama on a seemingly strong rebound there:

Hillary Clinton desperately needs to claim more white votes if she is to win a desperately needed primary by taking the Democratic presidential contest in North Carolina May 6.

But with five weeks to go, undecided whites likely to vote in that primary are, if anything, slowly moving to Obama’s column, or may be ready to.

Here are the results of our North Carolina poll from Wednesday night:

“If you are voting in the Democratic primary and the election were held today, who would you vote for?”

Barack Obama (49%)
Hillary Clinton (34%)
Undecided (17%)

The poll was conducted by InsiderAdvantage/Majority Opinion on March 26. It sampled 406 likely voters in the May 6 North Carolina Democratic presidential primary. The margin of error is plus or minus 5%. The data have been weighted for age, race, gender and party affiliation.

“Firewall state” has been the king of clichés during this campaign season, but that term has never applied more than North Carolina does for Clinton. If she loses badly here, regardless of any modest gains in the national delegate count, her candidacy may be done unless her primary victories in Florida and Michigan somehow end up being seated at the national nominating convention.

Most troubling for Clinton is that the trends in our polling of North Carolina show that a modest but significant portion of whites are drifting from Clinton back into the “undecided” column. Twenty percent of whites are undecided.“

Usually voters who change their minds do so gradually,” said Matt Towery, CEO of InsiderAdvantage. “A voter who’s going to switch from Clinton to Obama likely will first say they are undecided, and only later make a complete switch from her to him,” he said.

Our new poll also indicates that the controversy about Barack Obama’s fiery former church pastor so far isn’t alienating enough whites to significantly boost Clinton’s chances for a comeback in the Democratic race, at least in North Carolina.

BUT: this lady still has not sung. Clinton could still somehow pull off seating some or part of the contested delegations or somehow peel off enough Superdelegates. But then, the conventional wisdom says, the party could likely be split as many African-American voters and younger voters who flocked to the polls would feel cheated.

OR WOULD IT? A new Gallup poll gives details:

Democrats are at most risk of losing the support of independents, conservative Democrats, and, among Hillary Clinton supporters, less well-educated Democrats if those voters’ preferred candidate — Clinton or Barack Obama — does not win the party’s nomination. Black Democrats appear loyal to the party regardless of who wins the nomination.

…The finding that sizable percentages of Democrats say they would vote for Republican John McCain next November if the Democratic nominee is not their preferred candidate raises interesting questions about exactly whom the Democrats are most at risk of losing in the general election.

The poll gives breakdowns and then:

Across the board, the data show that Democratic support in the general election is more at risk among some subgroups of voters than among others. In particular, independent voters who lean Democratic are more likely than any other subgroup tested to say they would vote for McCain if their candidate does not gain the nomination. Additionally, conservative Democrats appear to be less attached to the party than are liberal Democrats, and more willing to say they would vote for McCain if their candidate is not the nominee.

…..These findings are not necessarily surprising, but underscore Democrats’ vulnerability with voters who are positioned somewhat more in the middle of the political or ideological spectrum. This may also reflect McCain’s strong appeal to independent voters, who may not need much nudging to shift their vote from a Democratic candidate to McCain.

So the Democrats may wish to choose: whose supporters does it wish to alienate and which rejected candidate’s supporters can do us less damage in the Presidential and Congressional elections?

Meanwhile, Clinton is leaving nothing to chance. She plans to campaign intensely in North Carolina. And she is lowering expectations, getting the word out that she expects that North Carolina will be an uphill battle.

One group that will play a MAJOR role in North Carolina: independent voters, since state has an open primary in which Democrats and independents (not GOPers) can vote.

Another tidbit that could be troubling to the Clintonistas: Bloomberg news service reports that Pennsylvania delegates are looking at the race and seem particularly concerned about a Hillary Clinton led ticket due to several reasons.

The prospect of a Hillary Clinton victory in Pennsylvania’s April 22 Democratic primary isn’t swaying some of the state’s superdelegates, who are hanging back while they calculate whether rival Barack Obama might prove a stronger draw at the top of the ticket in November.

While the New York senator is leading in polls, some undecided superdelegates — elected officials who get an automatic vote on the party presidential nomination regardless of the primary’s outcome — say they are concerned that her nomination would motivate greater numbers of Republicans to turn out in November to vote against her, and other Democrats too.

It isn’t over until it’s over — and Hillary Clinton has the perfect right to wait until it is all over until it’s over. Her supporters will also likely clamor for Obama to drop out if he loses both Pennsylvania and North Carolina, particularly by big margins.

But the bottom line for the Democrats is that Republicans are salivating as they watch Democrats stubbornly grab defeat and pull it from the jaws of victory. Some Republicans commentators write of their admiration for Clinton’s single-mindedness in pursuing her agenda and how it will help the GOP.

And somewhere, John McCain is smiling.

Cartoon by Riber Hansson, Svenska Dagbladet, Sweden

This entry was posted on Thursday, March 27th, 2008 at 1:33 pm and is filed under Young Voters, Republican Party, Black/African-American, Independents, Voting, Newsweek Blogitics, Superdelegates, Brokered Convention, Conventions, Primaries, Approval Ratings, Democratic Party, Independent Voters, Minorities, Polls, 2008 Elections, Democrats, Republicans, Elections, John McCain, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Politics. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

My (personal) problem with Bloomberg »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.