‘Like that ‘Retard’ Fidel, Now We Have ‘Frankenstein-Saakachvili’: From Le Figaro

August 20th, 2008
By WILLIAM KERN

Print Print

Is the Georgia crisis a CIA-induced case of the Cuban Missile crisis in reverse?

In outlining the crisis over Georgia and its root causes, French Historian Alexandre Adler examines the tightly-woven web of Russia-Georgia history, from the rise of Stalin to that fateful day on August 9, when Russian tanks rolled into Stalin’s birthplace of Gori, Georgia.

Writing of America’s culpability for the crisis, Adler is particularly harsh:

“The disproportion of the military force used by Russia against Georgia belongs then, to the deep history that remains common to both peoples. The other certainty, no less historical, is the bankruptcy of the hegemonic role of the United States: driven by a resentment as irrational as it is mean-spirited, the American republic has continued to practice the delusional encirclement of post-Soviet Russia. Without a doubt, the twisted minds at the inept CIA’s Langley headquarters or the brains at the Pentagon have dreamed of having their own Cuba [reference to the Cuban missile crisis]. They thought they had found it in Georgia with their agent of influence, the current president Saakachvili.”

And then, comparing Georgia to Cuba, Adler goes on:

“And just like that retard Fidel Castro who, in 1962, wanted to launch atom bombs against Washington before the terrified eyes of his reckless allies in Moscow, here we have “Frankenstein-Saakachvili” wanting to involve his American patrons in the extreme and absurd logic that governs those who exalt in the narrow nationalism of Georgia. Indeed in Washington today, the climate is not indignation over the childishness of our news commentary, but about mutual accusations of irresponsibility, just as it was in Moscow the day after the Kennedy-Khrushchev duel over Cuba.”

So what’s the solution? Adler suggests:

“In the first place, put a permanent end to the logic of force to which Russia has tendency to give in to. Then, definitely inhibit the use of force by giving Russia the decent and necessary place that it must occupy in the construction of Europe. In addition, we must not push Ukraine toward confrontation with Russia. But also for Russia, do everything possible to ensure its historic reconciliation with our Polish and Turkish allies. This is a very tough, but indispensable road.”

By Alexandre Adler

Translated By Sandrine Ageorges

August 16, 2008

France - French - Original Article (French)

Several avenues are open to us in trying to shed some light on the conflict between Russia and Georgia. The first, which for once deviates from our usual custom, isn’t strictly about geopolitics. To speak of the relationship between Russians and Georgians, it is perhaps first necessary to envisage the complexity in terms of the societies involved, and the often deep and very profound ways they portray one another, which act as memes in the collective unconscious. We cannot, for example, put aside some of the places where the conflict is taking place, such as Gori, which is none other than the birthplace of Stalin.

The fact that the Russians have savagely bombed the town was unlikely due to strategic principles alone. Especially if, as I believe, Putin’s father had some trouble with the terrible Red Georgian Tsar. [There are rumors that Putin’s father, Vladimir Spiridonovich Putin, fought Stalin as a Nazi-collaborator and that he was captured by British forces. See photo below ]. In some ways Russians feel a mixture of fascination and repulsion toward their former Soviet compatriots in Georgia that at the moment has been given free reign, which seems quite profound, and which goes far beyond strategic calculation. Under Stalin, the Georgians ruled Russia at a crucial time when the destiny of the nation itself was at stake, and with their methods of unspeakable brutality, for the most part they saved it.

Stalin, indeed, wasn’t the only one responsible: Sergo Ordjonikidze - before he committed suicide after being encouraged to do so by his leader - was the true architect of the country’s’ industrialization [Stalin suspected him of plotting against him]; Avel Enukidze , in his turn, single-handedly created the Kremlin administration, which is in place to this day. Liquidated by Stalin in 1937, he was undoubtedly the most brilliant of all Georgian Bolsheviks.”

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing translated foreign press coverage of the unfolding crisis in the Caucuses.




This entry was posted on Wednesday, August 20th, 2008 at 7:30 pm and is filed under White House, Angela Merkel, EU, Political Philosophy, Nicolas Sarkozy, Communism, Columnists, Democracy, Nazis, Military Affairs, Eastern Europe, State Department, Revolutions, European Union, Newspapers, Poland, Bush Administration, G8, Foreign Policy, Condoleezza Rice, USA, War, Cuba, Minorities, George W. Bush, Political Cartoons, Military, Law & Legal Matters, Europe, Foreign Affairs, Cartoon Commentary, Russia, Germany, CIA, Foreign Politics, France, Ideologies, Videos, Social Commentary, United Kingdom, History. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 1 Comment

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.