Obama’s Race

July 23rd, 2008
By ROBERT STEIN

Print Print

It’s not as if John McCain has become irrelevant, but in the main ring of the ‘08 electoral circus, all eyes are now on Barack Obama’s solo high-wire act as he walks a racial, political and cultural tightrope toward the White House.

The questions are less about the two candidates’ policies and personalities than about the larger meaning of it all: “Could an Obama Presidency Hurt Black Americans?” CNN asks while citing those “who warn that an Obama victory could cause white Americans to ignore entrenched racial divisions while claiming that America has reached the racial Promised Land.”

Meanwhile, in the Wall Street Journal, the author of a book predicting that Obama can’t win now says that he “has already won a cultural mandate to the American presidency. And politically, he is now essentially in a contest with himself” to persuade “even Middle America to feel comfortable as the mantle they bestow on him settles upon his shoulders.”

This portentous pronouncement comes at the conclusion of a column titled “Why Jesse Jackson Hates Obama,” which argues that Jackson and his peers presided over “an extortionist era of civil rights, in which they said to American institutions: Your shame must now become our advantage.”

Obama, he claims, is moving beyond all that to become the anti-Jackson “to trade moral leverage for gratitude. Give up moral leverage over whites, refuse to shame them with America’s racist past, and the gratitude they show you will constitute a new form of black power. They will love you for the faith you show in them.”

All these exegeses are enough to make voters’ heads spin as they watch a gifted political figure weaving his way this week through a Middle East minefield and heading toward what promises to be a tumultuous reception in Europe.

Whatever the subtexts of Barack Obama’s American journey turn out to be, one conclusion is inescapable: Unlike the current occupant, if and when he moves into the Oval Office, a person of substance will be sitting there.

Cross-posted from my blog.




This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008 at 3:50 am and is filed under White House, Black/African-American, Bigotry, Newsweek Blogitics, John McCain, Racism, 2008 Elections, Race, Society, Barack Obama, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 6 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    The most unexpected consequence of Obama's candidacy is the dsiplay of the 1001 different angles from which it is being analyzed, parsed, spun, and generally used as fodder for pundit self-expression.

    It would all be good, if it didn't come across as a competition for the one and only true way to understand the impkications of race.
    It's not either/or, folks.

    Oddly, the white part of Obama's racial heritage is rarely acknowledged. That would be a worthy topic to explore by one Obama watcher or another.
    What does it mean that it's not?
    • ^
    • v
    The best thing is that Obama is not one of the dinosaurs from the past who exploit Perpetual Victimhood Forever, Inc. [tm], and he is a positive PC channel for many who otherwise would keep repeating the myths about our continued "oppressive" society (but where no racism is demonstrated they say it's just "hidden" or "in code," etc.) and a continued need for White Guilt Over Slavery. (Civil rights were restored in 1965 and even the South got cleaned up by the 1980s. Many of us are not about to succumb to the pathological guilt-and-atonement nonsense; I never enslaved anybody, am not racist, and am not to be expected to behave in a diseased manner for others' choices and decisions to satisfy a few "progressives" [sic].)
    • ^
    • v
    "What does it mean that it's not?"

    PC is powerful.
    • ^
    • v
    Other dinosaurs from the past epxloit a degree of progess to practice denial about the continuing pervasiveness of racism and the racial institutional consequences of the past.

    If only all the dinosaurs would hold their own convention, while the rest of us TALK about the past, the present and the future - all three, fully.
    • ^
    • v
    It that is a response to what I have written, it is illogical nonsense.

    While the kiddie "progressives" make a big deal of race and engage in all kinds of fiction and worse when referring to "racism" that isn't there, the rest of us simply look at and evaluate Obama as this year's Dem candidate and likely future President.
    • ^
    • v
    Thank you runasim for the best and truest one-sentence summaries I've yet come across: The most unexpected consequence of Obama's candidacy is the dsiplay of the 1001 different angles from which it is being analyzed, parsed, spun, and generally used as fodder for pundit self-expression.

    That was poetry. Unfortunately, you offered said pundits more fodder with: Oddly, the white part of Obama's racial heritage is rarely acknowledged. That would be a worthy topic to explore by one Obama watcher or another. What does it mean that it's not?

    I suppose it's only natural though. Obama's candidacy is unusual in many different ways -- and singularly unusual in many more. Because of that it stands to reason he would be put under a microscope -- the kind of microscope that only an extremely capable and extremely confident individual could withstand. Time will tell if he is such an individual.

    Just between you and me though... I hope he is. But I also hope that my hope doesn't transform itself into some sort of mindless self-projection based upon trivialities of one sort or another.
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.