Clinton, Obama Supporters Meet To Talk About Unity And Defeating McCain (UPDATED)

May 18th, 2008 by JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

There are concrete signs that the seemingly irreconcilable camps of Democratic Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are moving to begin planning on how to merge their efforts to focus on beating presumptive GOP Presidential nominee Senator John Mccain in November’s general election.

Quite a few pundits (including me) have suggested it looked almost impossible for the Clinton and Obama camps to put aside their differences and keep the eye on the electoral prize after such an acrimonious, divisive and grudge-inducing campaign. But this could prove to be yet ANOTHER bit of 2008 conventional wisdom that in the end proves to be a crock:

Top fundraisers for Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama have begun private talks aimed at merging the two candidates’ teams, not waiting for the Democratic nominating process to end before they start preparations for a hard-fought fall campaign.

The Washington Post paints a picture of supporters of two campaigns that want to hit the ground running once there’s only one candidate left to make sure the Democrats don’t hit the ground and fall on their faces due to being unready and divided in the difficult campaign to come:

Despite Obama’s apparently insurmountable lead in delegates needed to claim the nomination, aides to both candidates are resigned to the idea that the Democratic contest will continue at least through June 3, when Montana and South Dakota will cast the final votes of the primary season.

But in small gatherings around Washington and in planning sessions for party unity events in New York and Boston in coming weeks, fundraisers and surrogates from both camps are discussing how they can put aside the vitriol of the past 18 months and move forward to ensure that the eventual nominee has the resources to defeat Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) in November.

Mark Aronchick, a Philadelphia lawyer who has raised more than $1 million for Clinton’s bid, said that while her supporters have not given up on their candidate, they recognize the need to start preparing for the general election.

“Only if we do this right, and see this through in the right way, will there be a chance for a full, rapid and largely complete unification of the party,” Aronchick said.

According to the Washington Post, some 35 Clinton and Obama supporters met in Washington last week at a hotel for what Aronchick called a “”grope towards unity.”
To be sure, this ability of these Clinton and Obama supporters to look at their party’s overall goals and begin planning to merge operations to battle as Democrats versus Hillary or Obama supports is not unanimous.

You can see Internet comments and posts that suggest that if one candidate or another is nominated, the defeated candidate’s supporters won’t got for him/her.

And there are some Clinton supporters that insist she has lost mostly due to a ’sexist” campaign. Some of them say they’ll vote for McCain and try to defeat superdelegates that don’t back Clinton. Two members who say they “represent a group of thousands and of women who are very upset” even went on Bill O’Reilly, who peppered them challenging questions. WATCH THE VIDEO HERE.

But with polls showing this could be a blowout Democratic year, Congressional Republicans open showing signs of political flop sweat and near panic, McCain trying desperately to discreetly pull himself away from the most unpopular President in modern history and George Bush yanking him back in or hurting him with his high visibility, logic would dictate that the Democrats will unify and run a more cohesive and smarter political game.

However, logic has not always prevailed in past election years when it seemed “certain” the Democrats would capture the White House. And there are no “givens” on the outcome this election day.

But given Obama’s adept response to Bush’s “appeasement charge” this week, given how Democratic candidates cross the nation can taste this being a Democratic year, and given the fact that the more long-range-goal oriented and less emotional supporters of the Clinton-Obama camps are meeting, perhaps logic will prevail this year…

UPDATE: Be sure to read The Field HERE which has a related post. (We’ve now added The Field to the TMV blogroll under Left Voices, but it’s more center left so we may switch it or add it to Other Voice. But it will be on the TMV blogroll, which we use extensively for doing our posts).

This entry was posted on Sunday, May 18th, 2008 at 8:00 am and is filed under Voting, Republican Party, Women, Newsweek Blogitics, Primaries, Superdelegates, Negative Campaigning, Democratic Party, Elections, Republicans, Democrats, 2008 Elections, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John McCain, Sexism, Politics. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Random Reads »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.