« Star Power In Chambliss’ Georgia — The Democrat Kind
The Case Against Hillary Clinton For Obama’s Secretary Of State »



Daschle To Head HHS

November 19th, 2008
By PATRICK EDABURN

Print Print

tom_daschle_twn.jpg

President Elect Obama has chosen former Senator Tom Daschle to head up the Department of Health and Human Services according to news reports. The same reports indicate Daschle is likely to accept.

While it is hardly surprising that Obama would give a post to Daschle I might have expected him to go with Agriculture, given that the senator is from South Dakota. Daschle did focus on national health care during his stay in the Senate though so it does make some sense.

One issue I have been pondering is whether the Daschle pick is going to end up being something of a sop to the left or if it is going to show his decision to govern futher to the left that he previously indicated.

The reason for wondering about his governing to the left is because Daschle is a strong advocate of a single payer style NHS and while most of us support some form of health care reform the Daschle option is pretty far to the left.

On the other hand I could see this as a sop to the left in that even if Obama did want to promote such a program it is unlikely he could do so under current budgetary restraints and so putting Daschle in there gives him the ability to say he tried.

I do not seem to be the only one wondering this.

Fellow TMV blogger Tony Campbell has pointed out that so far no Republicans have been named to the Obama Cabinet and while things are still early we all would hope that he does follow through on his promise of bipartisan government.

On the other hand, as I previously indicated the left blogs seem upset with some of Obama’s picks (like Clinton at State rumors or Holder at Justice).



This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 19th, 2008 at 2:54 pm and is filed under Tom Daschle, Obama Administration, At TMV, Barack Obama, 2008 Elections, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 6 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    The Democrats generally support universal federal (not "national") health care in the USA.

    Most plans like Obama's that fall short of this are merely incrementalist maneuvers.

    Only the farthest left Dems openly seek federal health care provision at this time (Conyers, Kucinich).

    The Conyers-Kucinich bill is flawed. On the other hand, other Dems have not given up on the ultimate goal. Ted Kennedy, for example, is back. Get ready for his bill, everybody.

    http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/11/18/ted-kenn...
    • ^
    • v
    Tom Vilsack (who ran unsuccessfully early in the presidential campaign) may be rewarded with Ag.

    http://www.agweekly.com/articles/2008/11/17/new...
    • ^
    • v
    Why are we still looking at things through a left-versus-right prism? How about a what- works- and- what- doesn't prism for a change? Interestingly, a number of practicing U.S. physicians now favor single-payer plans, and I seriously doubt that most of them are socialists. Here's a letter from one such individual that I recently read in the NY Times: I'm not saying I agree or disagree with it; I don't know enough at this point to make that call, but I do think this is a preferable framework for discussion.



    October 28, 2008 11:40 am


    Why do we allow the insurance companiies to siphon off $500 billion per year in administrative costs and profits - and by the standard practice of routinely denying legitimate claims siphoning off still more dollars?

    Why can't we learn from other countries that a single payer system is the only sane answer?

    Some may brand me a socialist or worse for this opinion; I would rather characterize myself as a caring physician frustrated with the insane politics that stll clouds this issue.

    — David Tiersten, M.D., Maplewood, NJ
    • ^
    • v
    I agree with Sylny, we need to be concerned about reality, and what is going to be best for the country, rather than allow ourselves to become mired in outdated and regressive thinking. My concern is that Obama will be too moderate in his desire to be seen as "bipartisan" in a time when that is not longer a worthy goal in itself. The status quo has been killing us for decades now, and we will eventually reach the point of no return if we don't get our act together. Courageous and visionary leadership is what is called for at this critical juncture. If Obama lives up to his hope and change message, then perhaps we stand a chance, but if he plays it safe, then his administration will end on the same sorry note it started on.
    • ^
    • v
    I'd be curious to know what right-leaners or center-right would propose for our health care "problem?" Generally all I've heard is more free-market solutions. Competition, etc.

    The real-world problem premises would be:
    1) nearly 50 million uninsured Americans currently,
    2) most expensive health care in the world, despite being far down the list on longevity, infant mortality and many measurable qualifiers of health care "success,"
    3) number one cause of personal bankruptcy being "getting sick."

    But I tell you what: I had a patient yesterday who needed a screening brain CT, and he had the choice, within a 5 minute drive of our small-town clinic, of three different facilities that could offer it to him. And he had the clinic visit, the CT and the answer within the hour. What are we willing to trade here?
    • ^
    • v
    I forgot to add to the above comment that he had private insurance. Probably a deductible, maybe some co-payment. Who pays for the rest?

    My "insurance" premiums are about $600/month for a family of three, we in moderately good health, and a $6000 deductible per year.

    If he's on my plan, I'm paying for his CT.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Star Power In Chambliss’ Georgia — The Democrat Kind
The Case Against Hillary Clinton For Obama’s Secretary Of State »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.