Memo To Governor Palin: Boffo Speech, But You Got The Lipstick Analogy All Wrong

September 4th, 2008
By SHAUN MULLEN, TMV Columnist

Print Print

01aaa_palinspeech02.jpg

It has now been confirmed that Sarah Palin can bite. But can she chew and digest?

In a Republican National Convention appearance that was 95 percent theater and 5 percent substance, the Alaska governor broke her silence with an Exxon Valdez of a speech laden with empty rhetoric that was received with roaring adulation by delegates already fired up by the demagogic Rudy Giuliani, whom we can truly thank God is not on the ticket.

And oh the quips!

“The difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull?

“Lipstick.”

Lowering expectations to subterranean levels and then dutifully ignoring her bald-faced lies — that she never supported the infamous Bridge To Nowhere, pushed for earmarks or supported special interests — the feckless news media declared that Palin had hit a home run.

The Wall Street Journal
, giddily oblivious to Palin’s singular talent as a public official who fires police chiefs, librarians and anyone else who gets in her way, compared Palin to Margaret Thatcher. Fox News, its Teleprompters locked and loaded with with gender-specific language, gushed that Palin “could defang” Joe Biden. Analogies to cat fights and that the campaign now has legs are sure to follow.

For a few minutes, all of the baggage that Palin brought to the McCain ticket was so much flotsam bobbing in the Bering Sea, but then a funny thing happened:

The sun came up in the east again this morning in St. Paul and Washington and New Orleans and Baghdad and Kabul, and the tough-talking, walking-the-walk woman with a hip pocket full of one-liners from the GOP snark factory was just as unqualified and unprepared as when John McCain gave her a ringie-dingie six days ago and asked her to accompany him to the Big Dance. That is because no flash-card crash course in world affairs by neocon tutors is going to prepare someone as uncurious and dogmatic as Palin for prime time.

Palin’s references to her family, which left acres of delegates in tears, were as cold as a bottle of kompassionate konservatism ketchup sitting in an empty refrigerator in the kitchen of a foreclosed house.

This is because while Palin is surely a loving mommy to her knocked-up daughter and special-needs son, she checks her heart at the door as a card-carrying right-wing Christianist and culture warrior who would forbid a helping hand from Washington, let alone Juneau, for our own similarly-challenged offspring. As if to hammer this home, she took a carefully-aimed and deeply-insulting swipe at the soul of many an American town and city — its community organizers — and by extension the poor, downtrodden and others that they serve.

A sure-fire way to attract all those disaffected Democratic women, no? And after giving her speech a second listen this morning, it sounded awfully like an acknowledgment that the Republicans are giving up on attracting swing voters and will focus instead on placating its restive base with lots of red meat.

But nary a peep about her conservative heroes: George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.

How can that be? How could Palin talk relentlessly about “change” when her date to the Big Dance voted with her heroes the vast majority of the time? In fact, her speech was about as backward-looking as I can recall at any convention, turning on its ear the notion that these confabs are about setting the table and going boldly forward. This, by golly, is because McCain-Palin would be just four more years of the same old same old.

Yes, Palin proved herself to be a smooth talking mocker, but you’d better believe that McCain’s handlers will keep her on a short leash so she doesn’t step on the Big Guy’s lines. In fact, in the weeks to come, Palin’s primary job will be to put lipstick on McCain and not herself.

And that promises to be a particularly unattractive sight.




This entry was posted on Thursday, September 4th, 2008 at 9:13 am and is filed under Social Conservatives, Newsweek Blogitics, Sarah Palin, RNC St. Paul Convention, Religious Right, John McCain, Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, Rudy Giuliani, 2008 Elections. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 8 Comments

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion