« Black Conservatism in Large and Small Caps
Book Review: ‘Shadow of the Silk Road’ »



Who Wanted the Head of the New York Governor?

March 15th, 2008
By WILLIAM KERN

Print Print

Was there something beyond Eliot Spitzer’s ungoverned libido behind his breathtaking downfall? Andrei Fedyashin writes for Russia’s Novosti news service, ‘Spitzer had his career and family life taken down by the forces of political retribution … Only the naive can doubt that this was a pre-arranged “sex scandal.”‘ Pointing out that most of his Wall Street enemies were Republican, Fedyashin asks, ‘Who better to bring down, if not a Democrat and personal friend of Hillary Clinton, who had formally pledged to support her at the upcoming Democratic convention? As a governor, Spitzer is among one of about 800 so-called super-delegates, who may well decide which candidate will lead the party’s fight for the White House - Clinton or Barack Obama … Perhaps the explanation is that Hillary frightens Republicans far more than her party-comrade, Barack Obama?’

By Political Columnist Andrei Fedyashin

Translated By Igor Medvedev

March 14, 2008

Russia - Novosti - Original Article (Russian)

MOSCOW: Less than a week after a “sex scandal” erupted around the Governor of the State of New York on March 13, Democrat Eliot Spitzer announced his resignation on March 17.

Unofficially, on the day that The New York Times published the spicy details of his phone order for a “short brunette,” it was clear that Spitzer, who two years ago was thought to have a promising future as a likely Democratic candidate for the White House - had destroyed his political career and probably his family. She [the brunette] was “delivered” to the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, where the 48-year-old Spitzer spent the night before testifying to Congress. How badly everything turned out! Bad from a purely moral point of view and doubly bad in a U.S. presidential election year.

It later transpired that Spitzer had used the services of this brunette and other call girls through a certain company called the Emperor’s Club VIP, and over the last ten years had paid it over $80,000. And considering that he allegedly paid $1,000 for this one brunette, one concludes that he must have had 80 of them during this time. This is quite a propensity for variety - even in ten years.

In a nutshell, this is the tale of the downfall of the now-former governor of America’s third-largest state. And now, apart from having to completely quit politics, he stands accused of the “illegal promotion of prostitution,” since the call girl was dispatched from New York to Metropolitan Washington D.C. According to the laws of the United States, transporting someone across state lines to procure sex is an even greater offense than prostitution itself. Moreover, he may also be deprived of his right to practice law. Simply put, when it rains it pours.

If you are unfamiliar with Spitzer’s record and fail to take account of his backround, you might get the impression that these charges of “illegal sex” came like a bolt from the blue. Sex scandals in America, of course, are nothing new: Almost every second U.S. President has committed adultery, with John F. Kennedy - given his record of such transgressions - mastering his White House rivals. That’s to say nothing of Senators, House members and other governors.
But these scandals do differ. Some are more moderate while others hit like a thunder-clap. The Spitzer story is of the latter category. Since this is a presidential year it couldn’t have been otherwise. It’s embarrassing again to speak here of political hypocrisy in the United States. It’s so unfortunate to devalue this meaningful notion through such frequent repetition.


READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with a startling array of global reaction to the Spitzer scandal



This entry was posted on Saturday, March 15th, 2008 at 9:48 pm and is filed under Scandals, Approval Ratings, Democratic Party, Psychology, Law Enforcement, Moral Values, Hypocrisy, Prostitution, Eliot Spitzer, Brokered Convention, Conventions, Newsweek Blogitics, Columnists, Embarrassment, Sexuality, Society, Polls, Congress, 2008 Elections, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Elections, FBI, Crime, Barack Obama, Russia, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 5 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Oh please.

    Now we are supposed to pay attention to Russian conspiracy theorists? Aren't are own good ol' US-of-A, home-grown crackpots loony enough for you?

    Nothing bad or good, anywhere, anytime, can avoid being latched on to by those who must have a conspiracy for EVERYTHING to play with.

    Conspiracies do happen, but that is not the same thing as everything can be explained by a conspiracy.
    • ^
    • v
    I guess that Rush Limbaugh is part of the conspiracy but his role was to act in a way to try to throw people off track, by promoting assistance to Hillary Clinton so that people wouldn't realize that Clinton is truly the Dem candidate that's most feared by the GOP.

    Or something like that.

    Another reason this is a silly conspiracy theory: are we to believe that getting rid of ONE Dem superdelegate (which puts a different Dem in his place, whose intentions of which Dem candidate he'll support I think are unknown at this time) is actually going to influence the outcome? Or is the theory that the GOP is currently working to find scandals that will force the resignation of a large number of the superdelegates that are pledged to Clinton?
    • ^
    • v
    Was this a national conspiracy (no), but the local IRS and bankers sure did go after Spitzer with a zeal equal to Spitzer's attacks on Wall Street. Like Clinton, if Spitzer keep his zipper shut he wouldn't have this problem. Lighten up, the international perspective is to be read with a little doubt.
    • ^
    • v
    "the local IRS and bankers sure did go after Spitzer"

    Well, by that definition, any investigation or action that involves two or more people is a 'conspiracy'.

    I like to stick the the concept that malfeasance needs to be attached to the conspirators before we let it rise to the level of a conspiracy.
    • ^
    • v
    Speculations of this kind are rampant in NY, but mostly on the sidelines.

    Politics is part of everything these days, and it is legitimate to wonder who decides which public figures are investigated and which not. I would not be surprised in the least if for every Spitzer caught in the headlights, there were two others thankiful that they were not.

    The botttom line is, though, that Spitzer did what he did
    The irony is that he was caught by mechanisms that he, himself, supported.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Black Conservatism in Large and Small Caps
Book Review: ‘Shadow of the Silk Road’ »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.