Guest Voice: Information Overload and The Race For President

June 7th, 2007 by JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

NOTE: The Moderate Voice runs Guest Voice posts from time to time by readers who don’t have their own websites, or people who have websites but would like to post something for TMV’s diverse and thoughtful readership. Guest Voice posts do not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Moderate Voice or its writers. NOTE: Broken link has been FIXED on this post.

Information Overload and The Race For President

By Alex Hammer

Bill Gates a while back wrote a memo to Microsoft employees detailing a new era for software. Software 1.0 (not his term, but he does speak in striking terms about the shifting paradigm) was about getting consumers more information. Software 2.0, he states, which is the future of software and a huge market opportunity, is about organizing the information that we already have, so that it is useful.

Actionable.

I’ve never heard anyone accuse Bill Gates of being stupid. He knows, as we all do, that we’re inundated - overwhelmed - with information. I know people, for example, that refuse even to use email anymore because they just can’t get through all the spam.

Welcome the 2008 race for President. As the owner of Politics 2.0, which focuses on the race for President in 2008, how do we traverse across the sea of Presidential 2008 information to provide readers what is useful to them and the type of information they are looking for and want to know?

In this day of information overload that is the question we all must answer.

We seek to do it, most essentially, by being hooked into the broadest relevant network of informational sources upon which to draw upon that we can, and then employing developed processes and tools of sorting, analyzing and implementing those informational sources in an efficient manner.

I trust that the candidates for President are likely doing a lot of the same.

When you look at the websites of the top Presidential candidates they are generally well organized, but there are differences. Barack Obama has the most sophisticated online social network on his site, and as Politics 2.0 details, Obama competes with Hillary Clinton and yes, Ron Paul, for the most Internet traffic.

The use of video, across You Tube and the candidates’ own sites is becoming increasingly well organized, and the amount of “friends”, and the outreach to them, volunteers and event groups is highly developed overall.

It has been said that with the proliferation of information that we have in the world today, that even less informed individuals - if you can say that in relative comparison terms - have greater informational knowledge across topics than more informed people of an earlier time.

This is applied to information only, not wisdom. While whether this can be applied to the whole can be debated, when you look at even the number of minimum wage jobs that involve computer knowledge skills, peer across blogs and other websites and Wikipedia, etc., it’s clear that a lot of people possess a lot of information in today’s world.

A Presidential candidate who “get it” in this world as it now exists, may be the one who can best integrate at a more meaningful level of analysis this great amount of informational input.

As opposed to giving the best answers of yesterday, that may be by now outdated and no longer readily apply.

As we listen to the large range of Presidential candidates across the debates, ads, videos and other informational mediums, that is the realm of inquiry to which I keep returning. The “best” answers, if you will, understand context and integrate varying perspectives and points of view. They can be plainly spoken but they must be sophisticated. And forward thinking. I don’t see how we can understand the future, much less the present, if we do not have a synthesized handle on the types of information that is out there today.

That’s a significant part of what I’m looking for in my President.

This entry was posted on Thursday, June 7th, 2007 at 12:51 am and is filed under Ron Paul, Internet, Bill Gates, You Tube, Media, Barack Obama, 2008 Elections, Computers, Hillary Clinton, Politics. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 responses about “Guest Voice: Information Overload and The Race For President”

  1. Guest Voice: Information Overload and The Race For President · Kokorec said:

    […] (more…) […]

  2. Robert Stein said:

    We’re stuffed with information but starved for understanding, and the candidates should be giving us context rather than “bumper-sticker slogans.” But the pressure of competing makes that hard to do, as this week’s “safer since 9/11″ unfortunately illustrates:
    http://ajliebling.blogspot.com/2007/06/safer-since-911-wrong-question.html

  3. Guest Voice: Information Overload and The Race For President · New York Articles said:

    […] (more…) […]

19 Wheeler: Only In The Hometown News »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.