How the Parties Will Short-Sheet the System in Texas

August 28th, 2008
By JAZZ SHAW, Assistant Editor

Print Print

Take a look at this page from the state of Texas and you will note something odd. (In case you don’t care to click through the jump, I’ll put in a small screen capture for you.)

TexasBallot.GIF This is the list of valid candidates on the ballot in Texas for this fall. (Click for full size image.) The odd thing you may note is that there is only one name present in the race for president. That name is Bob Barr’s.

Well,” you might say, “not to worry. It’s only August.” Good point! It is only August. In fact, it’s August 28, 2008 and there are still 68 days until the election. Very astute of you to notice. But now, let’s take a brief look at a rather unambiguous piece of Texas election law, shall we? (Cross check at Election Ballot News.)

Section 192.031 of the Texas election code says that political parties must certify their presidential and vice-presidential candidates for the November ballot no later than 70 days before the general election. It says, “A political party is entitled to have the names of its nominees for president and vice-president placed on the ballot if before 5 p.m. of the 70th day before presidential election day, the party’s state chair signs and delivers to the secretary of state a written certification of the name’s of the party’s nominees for president and vice-president.

How much would you like to bet that Obama and McCain will still miraculously find a way to be on the ballot in Texas? Oh.. wait! That didn’t take very long, did it?

Since we sent out our release yesterday regarding Bob [Barr] being the only presidential candidate certified in Texas, a spokeswoman for the Texas Secretary of State’s office stated that, “Upon further checking, both parties filed before the deadline. We expect their amended filings after both parties finish their nominating process at the conventions.

The people doing the heavy lifting on this investigation have yet to locate any exception in Texas election law allowing for substitutions of candidate names or amendments after the filing deadline. The law is short, clear and concise. Such exceptions are allowed in West Virginia, Massachusetts, Maine and Pennsylvania. (These are all states where the Republican Party has filed in court to try to get Barr off the ballot.)

So, I’m sure you’re wondering if this is just Jazz Shaw pushing to try to keep McCain and Obama off the ballot in Texas in some hopeless attempt to help Bob Barr’s chances. Actually, it’s exactly the opposite. Obviously you want to have the candidates’ names on the ballot. But this is an excellent example of how election law across the states has been increasingly crafted by the two major parties to make it as difficult as possible to get a third party candidate on the ballot, while such laws are uniformly ignored if the Democrats or Republicans violate them. (For the record, George W. Bush missed the filing deadline in Florida in 2004 which, at that time, also had no exceptions for the filing deadline, but was put on the ballot anyway.)

Third party candidates, however, are expected to not only meet every date, dot every “i” and cross every “t” but also submit two jazillion signatures, each signed in virgin’s blood (certified in writing as being pure by the Pope) along with sixteen bajillion dollars and the shin bone of a unicorn. We discussed this today with Andrew Davis of the Barr campaign during the second half of our radio show, should you care to listen to a replay. All of these difficulties don’t even come close to the challenges you face in trying to get in on the fall presidential debates. Speaking of which, here’s a trivia question for you… and don’t think about this for too long or blood will drip out of your eyes. What jobs did the two people in charge of the private company in charge of organizing the presidential debates hold prior to their current positions?

If you guessed “head of the DNC and RNC respectively” give yourself a cookie. Oh, yes… I’m sure they are heavily invested in getting the voices of third party candidates heard.

If you want more choices, the system needs to be changed from the ground level on up. Otherwise you’re going to get the exact same choices you’ve been seeing for years now. Good luck with that.




This entry was posted on Thursday, August 28th, 2008 at 7:00 pm and is filed under Republican Party, Newsweek Blogitics, Texas, Bob Barr, Third Parties, Democratic Party, 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, John McCain, Elections, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 2 Comments

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.