Will Anyone Care?

November 30th, 2007
By PETE ABEL, Managing Editor


Some of you will remember “The Letter,” my attempt to amplify the voice of moderate Republicans and Independents. Around the middle of June this year, I launched the signature drive. Today, we have 40 names, collected at an average pace of eight a month, two a week.

On the one hand, considering a country of some 200 million voting-age adults (of which an estimated 80 million are Republicans and conservative Independents) — who really cares what 40 people think?

On the other hand, out of an estimated 500 people who actually read “The Letter,” eight percent took time to sign it. Now, if that “poll” was nationally valid — which it’s probably not, but let’s play it out anway — eight percent of 80 million is 6.4 million potential voters. Of the estimates I’ve seen, this crowd is close to the size (on a percentage if not raw number basis) of the hard-core Religious Righters who contributed to the GOP’s decline.

So maybe “The Letter” matters, and maybe it doesn’t. Regardless, on Monday, Dec. 3, we’re distributing it.

In retrospect, I wish I’d had more time over the last five months to devote to this effort. I also wish I had time now to go back, add, and vet a paragraph on uncompromising opposition to government-endorsed torture. But time is increasingly something of which I just don’t have enough. Besides, this effort is but one small cry in the dark. It can’t stand on it’s own and, fortunately, it won’t: There’s a growing crowd of similar efforts by other individuals and organizations.

And who knows? Maybe, eventually, there will be enough of these cries in the dark that someday, somewhere, somebody will care.

————————-

December 3, 2007

House Republican Conference
Republican National Committee
Republican Governors Association
Leading GOP Presidential Candidates
National Republican Senatorial Committee

We, the undersigned, are moderate Republican and Independent voters who represent a growing force within the electorate.

Republican candidates will need to increasingly reckon with us in the months and years ahead, as we mobilize for no purpose less dramatic than the rescue of this Party and the refocusing of its platform on the bedrock principles of individual liberty and limited government; lower taxes and free markets; a strong national defense and collaborative foreign policy.

We intend this letter as an encouragement to GOP leaders who (a) embrace the principles outlined above; (b) recognize that the narrow-minded strategies of certain social conservatives have made the Party a shadow of its former self; (c) reject these social conservatives’ alienating approach; and (d) prefer what former U.S. Senator John Danforth has labeled a politics of “reconciliation,” a politics wherein we seek to emphasize what unites rather than what divides us. If you fit in this category, we encourage you to speak up and boldly state your beliefs, without equivocation. And if certain social conservatives attack you for doing so, we will be there to lend our support.

We believe the wise use of taxpayer dollars requires our government to avoid deficits and the enormous and unnecessary burden those deficits will place on future generations.

We believe in personal responsibility, self-reliance, capitalism, and the power of markets – markets that are allowed to operate with the least possible degree of regulation that is necessary to safeguard fair play and equal opportunity.

We believe in prudent actions that advance our national security, grounded in a foreign policy that, quoting former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman, is “premised on the understanding that the rest of the world matters to us,” and that thus we should guard “against becoming ensnared in nation-building enterprises and push for policies that engage us with the world community and show, in the words of the Declaration of Independence, ‘a decent respect to the opinions of mankind.’”

We believe in the U.S. Constitution, its checks and balances, and importantly, the protections it affords our citizens such as habeas corpus. We further believe habeas corpus and other fundamental cornerstones of our Republic should be carefully guarded and delicately balanced during both times of peace and times of war, especially during extended, complex, and largely open-ended conflicts like today’s war on terror.

We believe in maximizing personal liberty and minimizing government interference in our private lives, including the lives of pregnant women, terminally ill patients, gays, lesbians, and all other categories of responsible, law-abiding adults. Again quoting Governor Whitman: “The defining feature of the conservative viewpoint is a faith in the ability, and a respect for the right, of individuals to make their own decisions – economic, social, and spiritual – about their lives. The true conservative understands that government’s track record in respecting individual rights is poor when it dictates individual choices. Accordingly, the conservative desires to limit government’s reach as much as possible. Traditional conservatives adhere to the maxim, often attributed to Thomas Jefferson, that government governs best that governs least.”

We further believe that the truest pro-life position is one which allows and encourages the ethical pursuit of all scientific research that holds promise for mitigating diseases that afflict our families and friends.

We believe the education of our young people is critical to our future as a nation and that realistic, fiscally conservative policies should be developed to further advance educational standards, opportunities, and access, from the lowest grades to the highest, from kindergarten through college.

We believe in reasonable policies that will advance the health of our citizens, with an emphasis on children, seniors, and others who are truly in need and cannot otherwise afford health care.

We also believe in reasonable policies that will advance the health of our environment, with careful attention paid to protecting our economic vitality and objective analyses of the pro’s and con’s of alternative energy sources.

In summary, we embrace what management guru Jim Collins – in his bestselling book Built to Last – called the “Genius of the AND.” We believe the GOP and its members can and should be simultaneously pro-choice and pro-life; pro-environment and pro-economy; pro-family and pro-liberty; pro-budget and pro-opportunity; pro-security and pro-Constitution. These beliefs need not be contradictory nor exclusive.

If you are and/or know an incumbent or prospective GOP candidate who shares these beliefs and wants Republicans and Independents to stand united behind him or her, we encourage you to let us know, so we can add you and/or those you know to the roster of leaders we will support with our votes, voices, volunteers, and dollars.

REPUBLICANS

Pete and Sharon Abel, abel.reply@gmail.com, Chesterfield, MO

Dennis Sanders, dennis.sanders@gmail.com, Minneapolis, MN

Erik Sledd, dyre42@gmail.com, San Antonio, TX

Patrick Joubert Conlon, joubertconlon@hotmail.com, North Bend, OR

Patrick Edaburn, troosvelt@sbcglobal.net, Lodi, CA

Dena Ladd, dladd01@charter.net, Ladue, MO

Josh Holland, hollandj2@gmail.com, Chicago, IL

Christine Stanley, christin.stanley@comcast.net, Canton, GA

John Baird, saintlouie@gmail.com, Seattle, WA

Kathryn Petz, kathy@tjpetz.com, Blue Bell, PA

Marc Schulman, mschulman11@comcast.net, Bonita Springs, FL

Adam Smull, AdamSmull@gmail.com, Easton, PA

Melissa Lee Bird, Melissa.Bird@cox.net, Williamsburg, VA

Stan Gewanter, SMGewanter@aol.com, Melville, NY

Bob Bostock, BobBostock@aol.com, Lawrenceville, NJ

John C. Bradford, maine@republican-leadership.com, Brooklin, ME

Ron Ray, ron@thecrouchgroup.com, Denton, TX

Merle B. Grindle III, bil@midmaine.com, Blue Hill, ME

Steven M. Brown, PhD, stevenmbrown@hotmail.com, Salem WI

Michael Bowen, mbowen@gmail.com, Los Angeles, CA

Lee Emmons, emmons.lee@gmail.com, South Bristol, ME

Christine G. Williamson, cfgw1022@yahoo.com, Virginia Beach, VA

Broc N. Dobervich, brocdobervich@netscape.net, Bloomington, MN

Alan Shilepsky, ashilep@bitstream.net, Minneapolis MN

Jeremy B. Dibbell, jbdibbell@yahoo.com, Boston, MA

Jerry Fordyce, editor@weekendpundit.com, Houston, TX

INDEPENDENTS

Stuart Chase, chasester@gmail.com, El Paso, TX

Daniel Merritt, rakosdf@hotmail.com, Columbus, OH

Rich Horton, rghorton@usa.com, River Falls, WI

Tom Giesler, tom_giesler@yahoo.com, Oak Park, IL

A. Dexter Chapin, adexterc@gmail.com, Edmonds, WA

Julie Small, jrsmall@tx.rr.net, Dallas, TX

Marc Moore, marc@blackshards.com, Iola, TX

Scott Arbuckle, scottfranklinarbuckle@yahoo.com, Indianapolis, IN

Charles Moore, csjmoore@gmail.com, Pleasant Lake, IN

Tony Meder, meder.5@osu.edu, Columbus, OH

M.Sgt and Mrs. C.E. Kubin, projectscreener@aol.com, Cheyenne, WY

Nathan Britton, nathanbrit@gmail.com, Honolulu, HI




This entry was posted on Friday, November 30th, 2007 at 2:54 pm and is filed under Republican Party, Moderate Republicans, Republicans. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus

The Torture Debate Continues… »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.