Why local elections may become less and less competitive

May 11th, 2008
By PAUL SILVER


In Vote Like Thy Neighbor William Galston and Pietro Nivola bring to me some new insight on the reason for the partisan divide. And some realism about the remedies.

…41 percent of the voters in 1984 were located at or near the midpoint of the ideological spectrum, compared with only 28 percent in 2004. Meanwhile, the percentage of voters clustering toward the left and right tails of the spectrum rose from 10 to 23 percent.

They describe how people are increasingly likely to live near people with similar values and world views thus making communities less politically heterogeneous.

Our study shows that this geographical sorting worsens polarization in several ways. When counties become more homogeneous, it becomes harder to use redistricting to create more competitive Congressional districts. (Recent research indicates that gerrymandering accounts for, at the very most, one-third of noncompetitive districts in the House of Representatives.) When states become more homogeneous, presidential campaigns begin by conceding a large number of contests to the opposition, disheartening their supporters in those states and increasing the majority’s electoral advantage. Polarization feeds on itself.




This entry was posted on Sunday, May 11th, 2008 at 6:40 am and is filed under Redistricting, Elections. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 3 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Once again, political correctness forces liberal researchers to skip over the ethnic and racial component of the uniformity. To find the Democratic landslide counties that the authors references, just look at the percentages of the public school at is white. In a place like Chicago where the public school is 9% white, the Republicans have no chance of winning. If you look at places like Northern Virginia that have gone from Republican to Democratic, it tracks very well with the delclining number of white students in the public schools.
    • ^
    • v
    The 'birds of a feather' tendency is a major motivator in all aspects of society.
    It's as natural as rain.
    It can be quite benign, and even enriching, in terms of preserving a wide array in terms of cultural heritage

    Homogenous groups, however, can also produce very dull people who lack intellectual inqusitiveness. about the outside world and a dispassionate understanding of their own.,

    When there is disproportionality in power among the groups, the wrost kind of divisivess occurs. The winners have no incentive to acknoledge their own role in
    producing negative results. They cling to their power advantage. no matter what, and in the face of any amount of evidence that this divided state of affairs serves no one well in the long run.

    It's easy to see, then, why safe seats come about, and why gerrymandered districts are not the only cause of the problem.
    That doesn't in any way reduce the severity of the problem, however.

    I wouldn't dismiss gerrymandering as an issue just because ficxng that isn't a miracle cure for everything.

    I would be much happier if everyone could just agree that it's a problem for everyone, winners and losers alike. Then we would be free to search for better fixes instead of getiing stuck in hostile power struggles.

    ..
    • ^
    • v
    I have to wonder how much the free access to a broad range of information sources also contributes to this. If I'm liberal-leaning now, I can spend my entire day only reading liberal news sources and getting few opinions other than the ones I already think are correct.

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus

The legacy of motherless mothers & their daughters who become mothers »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.