More Tragedy Pending in Burma? Burmese Gov’t Accepting Supplies, but Spurning Other Desperately Needed Aid

May 9th, 2008
By DAMOZEL


USETHISJOE.gif

Look at these faces.  While the rest of the world wrings its hands and waits helplessly on the sidelines, Burma’s government says it will accept aid, but that it doesn’t want the help of foreigners in getting it to the people. (BBC News)  The UN is pretty sure the government’s own unaided efforts won’t be enough. 

The UN says that up to 1.5 million people may have been affected by Cyclone Nargis, which devastated the Irrawaddy Delta region on Saturday. Burmese state media say 22,980 people were killed, but there are fears the figure could rise to 100,000.

Hundreds of thousands of people have no food, water or shelter. Officials say people could die because no help is getting to them.

In a statement, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon urged the junta to prioritise the aid effort over tomorrow’s nation-wide referendum on a widely-criticised new constitution.

It would be "prudent to focus instead on mobilising all available resources and capacity for the emergency response efforts", he said.  (BBC News)

International experts say that the military regime doesn’t have the resources to deal with a disaster of this magnitude. (BBC News)   The UN is concerned that failure to get help to the people who urgently need it may cause an even worse disaster.  (BBC News)   

The US is prepared to offer help, but so far haven’t been granted permission to fly in military planes.

"We are in a long line of nations who are ready, willing and able to
help, but also, of course, in a long line of nations the Burmese don’t
trust," US Ambassador Eric John said in Bangkok.

"It’s more than frustrating. It’s a tragedy," he said. (BBC News)   

I’ll say.  I’m shocked that this story isn’t getting more attention from the US media.  Nothing that is happening in the primaries is as important just now as what’s going on in Burma.  Speaking of priorities, what’s happened to ours?  Last September, progressives all over the internet were intent on showing solidarity with the monks of Burma.  Where are they now?   

This is one horrific situation piled on another….piled onto the previous ones. (BBC News)    A BBC reporter, Paul Danahar, has published a report on the current condition of the people most affected by the cyclone.

You drive round a corner and you see a village which has literally been wiped off the map. People are scavenging around, trying to get bits of corrugated iron to rebuild their homes, trying to get some shelter.

For now they have no food and no shelter. Their water supplies have been contaminated…


So the people who have survived are living with thousands of corpses, polluting their environment, polluting their water supply, and the risk of disease taking hold is getting worse and worse by the day.

What is uncommon is that it’s taking so long to get a clear picture of the challenge ahead. Normally three or four days after a disaster such as this, the numbers of casualties lurch upwards. But by now we should at least have a clear idea of the scale of the problem.

We still do not know because there are hundreds of thousands of people locked off by the broken bridges and blocked roads, and by a government which simply cannot commit to allow in outside help and assessment. (BBC News)

The BBC journalists who wrote the piece were literally having to hide from the Burmese government.  (BBC News)   As they said, this is bizarre — normally, governments in countries which have experienced disaster welcome the foreign journalists who get the story out.

We’ve seen close to home what the Burmese people are going through.  Their situation brings back memories of Katrina — the bafflement and misery of the people waiting with slowly diminishing hope for help that in many cases didn’t arrive till it was too late; the disproportionate effects on the poor, while the president was promising to rebuild Trent Lott’s house and his mother was speculating that things were actually working out very well for those ‘fortunate’ enough to get out. 

Here’s more from the BBC journalist inside Burma:

One man said to me earlier in the week: "When we had demonstrations last year the army were everywhere; where are they now?"

Villagers we have talked to say we were the first people they had met from outside their own community. They don’t know why help has not come.

One villager told me: "We don’t know the reasons why - we have heard that foreign aid may be coming. We really want it, but we don’t know when we are going to get it."

This was a man standing in the wreckage of his home. (BBC News

And of course it’s worse for the Burmese in direct proportion to the extreme poverty of those who are most endangered by the delay in help.

The BBC has posted some reports from Burmese who were affected by the cyclone here and here.

The French—via Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner—called for aid to be flown into Burma, permission or no permission. (Reuters)   "Kouchner suggested on Wednesday invoking a U.N. "responsibility to protect" to deliver aid without the junta’s approval, but France’s bid
to make the Security Council take a stand was rebuffed."  (Reuters)     The European Union Executive, Amadeu Altafaj Tardio, found the suggestion untenable. 

We cannot force the entry, the delivery of aid, we are not in a position to do that…. We put the accent on the diplomatic efforts to convince the Burmese authorities that the best way to assist the population is to allow humanitarian organisations to work independently."(Reuters)

 

In the meantime, your help in the form of money is desperately needed.  Doctors without Borders is appealing for aid.  Here’s a description from their site of conditions on the ground:

People are extremely traumatized. One man, a sailor, told us his village had been completely destroyed. He said he had no news of the 4,000 inhabitants of a neighboring village, which is to this day still under water. People tell stories of spending the night of the cyclone hanging on to trees all night long, while watching their villages being destroyed.

People say Burma has never seen such a catastrophe; they have lost everything and have very little hope of receiving assistance. In the Twantey and Dalla areas, 80 percent of the villages are destroyed. Some villages are still under water and not reachable. All bamboo constructions have been blown away. These constructions represent the majority of houses in these villages. A third of the town of Twantey has also been destroyed….

Food, shelter and access to clean water are critical. The population affected by this cyclone was already vulnerable. They now live in extremely precarious conditions, without food or clean water, often sleeping outside. In addition, malaria and dengue fever are prevalent in this area. We’re planning a mosquito net distribution in the coming days.  (Doctors without Borders site)

   

Please see also, if you haven’t already, this piece by Dr. Clarissa Pinkola Estes.

CROSS-POSTED AT BUCK NAKED POLITICS

Cartoon by Paul Zanetti, Australia




This entry was posted on Friday, May 9th, 2008 at 12:34 am and is filed under Progressives, Britain, EU, Human Rights, European Union, Burma, France, Places, Media Criticism, Europe, Hurricane Katrina, Asia, Media, 2008 Elections. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus

Than Shwe: This Child Is Burma’s Only Future: Do Not Let An Entire Generation of Burmese Children Be Wiped Out by Your Inaction »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.