Report from the Texas Democratic Party Convention

June 8th, 2008
By PAUL SILVER


Here are a few notes on my participation in the Texas Democratic Party Convention with 14,000 folks this weekend.

Thursday was a 6 hour meeting of the Platform advisory Committee which updates the 2006 version. I was gratified to see my finger prints on a variety of items: Same day voter registration, access to voting equipment by the disabled, redistricting reform, Mail in voting, Publicly financed elections, human trafficking, Energy net metering. It is amazing to realize how much impact each of us can have on important cultural institutions just by showing up and demonstrating a mature sense of understanding, communication and cooperation.

Friday was elections of delegates to various positions: national delegates, Elector college representative, party leadership, Committees on Rules, Platform Resolutions… Presentations from scores of speakers including Chelsea Clinton, Governor Kaine of Virgina and almost all the Democratic State Representatives and Candidates. Day ends at 4 am.

Saturday starts at 8am with all day meetings of the newly elected 30+ member resolution and platform committees. It was a fascinating experience of nuts and bolts democracy such as a one hour discussion about whether the Party should recommend the abolition of the Death Penalty. It did. Also was a debate about recommending criminal charges against Bush and Cheney. It didn’t. In essence it was a process of reconciling each member’s personal sense of balance between political realism and moral ideals. I also came to appreciate the awesome value of Roberts Rules of Order in managing group dynamics. At almost every moment the meetings could disintegrate and splinter if not for strong leadership and established rules of conduct. My respect for the talents and skills of Political leaders grew today.

In the end we voted around 60% of the Delegates to the national convention for Obama and 40% for Clinton.

I was disappointed in only a few ways, when after dozens of speeches about unifying the party the Clinton delegates promoted the idea that representatives to the various committees be allocated in proportion to Obama and Clinton supporters. Demonstrating to me that they were unclear on the concept of party unity. It was voted down.

Also in the heat of party enthusiasm the speakers frame many issues as that the Democrats are right and the GOP is wrong. I imagine this is reverse at GOP meetings. This may be fine for party regulars but it can undermine the courting of moderates and independents who vibrate between the values and point of of view of both parties. As with most elements of human nature we are all dualities of contrasting characteristics that ebb and flow with our changing circumstances. Sometimes we are each liberal and sometimes conservative. Crafting policy that reflects this truth requires particularly wise representatives who are relatively light on ideological purity and heavy on pragmatism.

This entry was posted on Sunday, June 8th, 2008 at 6:26 am and is filed under Texas, Conventions, Democratic Party. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


Rest Easy, Gentle Democrats »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.