Now Obama Also Visits John Edwards To Seek His Support For 2008 Democratic Presidential Nomination

February 17th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

PH2007101901653.jpg

It’s becoming a pilgrimage, of sorts. First, Senator Hillary Clinton visited former Senator and former Presidential wannabe John Edwards — seeking his endorsement and support. And now, in yet another meeting at Edwards’ home, Senator Barack Obama has visited Edwards.

The goal of each campaign: get Edwards’ endorsement and, not parenthetically, his delegates — particularly as the battle between Clinton and Obama goes down to the wire amid predictions that, if one of them doesn’t pull ahead, it could come down to a party-splintering convention where “superdelegates” could make the final decision.

The most intriguing report about the Edwards-Obama visit comes via ABC’s Political Radar …particularly the last line of it, which will have pundits trying to read the political tea leaves:

ABC News’ David Wright and Sunlen Miller Report: Mother Nature may have called a cease-fire in the snows of Wisconsin, but Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., appears to have put the time to good use.

A helicopter cameraman for ABC’s Raleigh-Durham affiliate WTVD spotted Obama leaving former rival John Edwards’ house on the North Carolina.

Such secrecy. (Who does Obama think he is? Tom Cruise?) MORE:

Clinton met with Edwards on Feb. 7.

Obama speaks with Edwards over the phone regularly. On Wednesday at a campaign event in Racine, Wis., Obama said, “He is going to be a major voice in the Democratic party for years to come, and I want him involved and partnering with me in moving this country forward.”

But much had happened in terms of political junkie stories before that:

–A story came out saying Edwards was seriously considering endorsing Clinton, because he didn’t think Obama was tough enough to do what it took to change some aspects about America.

–Other stories said Edwards had decided to remain neutral like former Vice President Al Gore.

And now?

The weather helped the meeting take place this time, as Obama’s event in Appleton, Wis., was cancelled because of snowy conditions. Obama, who had spent the night at home in nearby Chicago, took advantage of the unexpectant gap in his schedule and flew down to Raleigh early afternoon. Edwards’ wife, Elizabeth, was present for the meeting.

Apparently, Obama and Edwards hugged at the conclusion of the meeting.

So what does that mean? To play the speculation game:
–He is going to endorse Obama in the end.
–He isn’t going to endorse Obama, but respects him and wishes him well
–He’s going to remain neutral but had a good session with him.

What would an endorsement mean? Firstly, if the timing came soon, it could influence the remaining primaries.

Endorsing Clinton would signal Edwards is in-effect saying “Whoa. Wait a minute. I don’t care what Ted Kennedy says, this dude isn’t really ready for prime time. We need someone who has more experience and is tougher.” Endorsing Obama would likely carry a lot of weight right now, it’d be a signal of yet another prominent Democrat who feels Obama is tough enough to bring about some changes but also can combine that with political skills so that he could bring about substantive change without polarizing the country.

And if Edwards stays neutral?

It would signal that Edwards, seeing how close the race is, is keeping his options open so he can be the Kingmaker/Queenmaker at the Democratic convention (on the other hand, a Clinton adviser says nothing really matters since Mrs. Clinton will win all the superdelegates in the end and be nominated, no matter what happens in future primaries).

Here is a cross section of other weblogs indulging in some tea-leaf reading and reaction:

Wake Up America:

An endorsement from Edwards could be very beneficial to either the Obama or Clinton campaigns, which are in a virtual dead heat at this point. Clinton has moved on in her campaign from Wisconsin to Texas in an attempt to rally her support there.

Blue Crab Boulevard:

The report says that the two men hugged at the end of the meeting. (They know this how?) That doesn’t sound too good for Hillary Clinton, does it?

Talk Left:

They hugged as Obama left John Edwards’ home after their sit-down today. Elizabeth was at the meeting too.

More tea-leaf reading anyone? Will Edwards wait until after March 4 and Ohio and Texas to announce his endorsement or will he give a much needed boost to Obama in those states? Or, could he be considering endorsing Hillary?

Ace of Spades:

I wrote before that I think Edwards has waited too long to announce an endorsement for it to really sway anyone. But Obama and Clinton clearly disagree, so what do I know? It occurs to me that Obama is also on the lookout for a running mate and Edwards may help bring some of the southern states which in Obama vs. McCain matchups seem to be going overwhelmingly to McCain. People are talking about a Republican Southern Sweep. That’s got to have Obama worried.

Random Thoughts From Reno:

I doubt any endorsement is in the works, particularly given how close the race is between Obama and Clinton.

–The Daily Kos has an extensive and intriguing diary which includes this as an update:

CNN: Elizabeth Edwards was also in the meeting. Obama campaign said it was about the campaign and the issues that are facing America. Edwards looking for two things: who will be most effective in carrying on his message RE: fighting poverty; which of these candidates is most electable? He wants to make sure that whoever he backs can beat a Republican. Notes that Edwards has not committed to endorsing anyone at all — wanted to keep out of the endorsement business for a long time. Notes that an endorsement from today would make a lot of impact in Wisconsin. Notes that it was planned in advance, not a detour due to the weather (so I was wrong?). Planned in advance to essentially talk about an Edwards endorsement. Notes that endorsement will likely carry either candidate over the top in Ohio.

Note that Elizabeth Edwards was reportedly lobbying her husband in favor of Sen. Obama, per a CNN report which the family later denied.

Faith Progressive:

John Edwards is still very popular here in Wisconsin–he lost narrowly to Kerry here even after Sen. Kerry had built up momentum. (I’ll always remember being on the stage in Middleton, chatting with Kerry’s siblings and meeting Sen. Max Cleland ,while we waited for the results to be final in 2004.) The day before our Feb. 19th primary would be the perfect time for an endorsement of Sen. Obama.

Prairie Weather:

Barack Obama avoided a snowbound Wisconsin today and flew to North Carolina for a visit with John Edwards. The reasons for this meeting are probably obvious. Edwards has had a lot of attention lately, particularly from Hillary Clinton. This quiet meeting may turn out to have been more definitive as Obama edges ahead of Clinton in the primaries. But no one’s talking right now.




This entry was posted on Sunday, February 17th, 2008 at 6:39 pm and is filed under Primaries, Newsweek Blogitics, Conventions, Brokered Convention, Superdelegates, Electoral College, Elizabeth Edwards, Democrats, 2008 Elections, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 2 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    I don't think Edwards' endorsement will carry much weight, if any. The longer he waits, the longer the other candidate can claim political expediency. It was a sign of weakness for him to wait for so long in the first place. Now it just looks like indecisiveness.
    • ^
    • v
    It's definitely better for Edwards to remain neutral at the moment, until one candidate clearly pulls ahead. Then he can back the winner and take the prize (whatever it is they negotiate). I think if Obama stays ahead in the upcoming races and then takes both OH and TX by at least 55/45 (it's doable for Obama, but not likely) then Edwards may feel comfortable endorsing Obama. If Hillary can't pull Obama down then Edwards won't endorse one or the other until this summer.

    But of course this is all speculation and I'm sure that of the one million and one opinions out there, the only one that will be right is the one million and two (the one that only Edwards knows for sure).
 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.