Three Cheers for Triangulation

May 20th, 2008
By PAUL SILVER

As a relatively practical business person I am a big fan. Almost every response to every problem is a balancing of choices.

There is no standard definition, but it is widely accepted that the term came into use during the Clinton administration and was coined by adviser Dick Morris.

Morris described triangulation in a PBS interview in 2000, saying:

Morris: Take the best from each party’s agenda, and come to a solution somewhere above the positions of each party. So from the left, take the idea that we need day care and food supplements for people on welfare. From the right, take the idea that they have to work for a living, and that there are time limits. But discard the nonsense of the left, which is that there shouldn’t be work requirements; and the nonsense of the right, which is you should punish single mothers. Get rid of the garbage of each position, that the people didn’t believe in; take the best from each position; and move up to a third way. And that became a triangle, which was triangulation.

In 2006 Morris more simply described it as “taking the best from the right and from the left and discarding the rest.”

Others have given their own take on it. Time magazine’s Joe Klein ventured in Three Cheers for Triangulation that “it proposed the achievement of liberal ends through market-oriented conservative means. Welfare reform, which combined a work requirement with significant financial incentives for the working poor, was the best example of how the philosophy might work.”

h/t Justin Bank at FactCheck.org

If the Democrats don’t achieve 60 votes in the Senate then I hope they choose to master this political technique rather than condemn us to death by a thousand stalemates. And I hope we can all learn to vote for candidates with a temperament to appreciate the merits in different points of view.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 20th, 2008 at 8:42 am and is filed under Political Philosophy. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 3 Comments

ChrisWWW 4 months ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

That assumes the Republicans wont just filibuster everything--even if the legislation is benign--like they've done so far.

reply edit reblog flag

318 /people/ChrisWWW/ /people/ChrisWWW/following/ http://www.whyweworry.com

PaulSilver 4 months ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

They could filibuster popular legislation but at the risk of losing even more seats in the 2010 election and the power to filibuster anything. I would think that moderate Republicans would be anxious to cut deals that respect some of their philosophy and interests.

reply edit reblog flag

17 /people/PaulSilver/ /people/PaulSilver/following/

runasim 4 months ago 1 point
Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

They could filibuster popular legislation but at the risk of losing even more seats in the 2010 election and the power to filibuster anything. "

I hope that works out as predicted. There is a vast swath of conservatives,, however, who believe that giving any ground at all is a betrayal of their principles, Some would rather stale-mate Congress into oblivion than move an inch.

Whether or not that results in losing their seats in elections depends on their constituents. I wonder if some would retain theri seats precisely because they have proved to be immovable. The 'birds of a feather' effect in communities has far-reaching political implications.

reply edit reblog flag

141 /people/runasim/ /people/runasim/following/

Trackbacks

blog comments powered by Disqus

« Um …

Prison Rape: How a difficult challenge is being addressed »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.