Jack Cafferty’s ‘Dark Mentality’

April 17th, 2008 by WILLIAM KERN

Has CNN host Jack Cafferty and others criticizing China over Tibet and its human right record betrayed a “sense of superiority” and an often dormant “anti-Chinese racism?” Such is the conclusion of this article penned by Ding Gang, senior desk editor at China’s strictly-controlled state run People’s Daily.

Dang writes, “Harboring hatred for China’s development, the Caffertys of the world have assaulted, slandered, framed and spread rumors over recent years, and now they have finally - nakedly - come to the fore.” Beijing’s assault on the Western media shows no sign of abating.

By Ding Gang*

April 17, 2008

People’s Republic of China - People’s Daily - Original Article (English)

On April 9, when CNN broadcast the news on the Olympic torch relay in San Francisco, its host Jack Catterty remarked that Chinese products are “junk” and that the Chinese people are “basically the same bunch of goons and thugs they’ve been for the last 50 years WATCH .” These abuses by Cafferty are by no means accidental, revealing as they do the dark mentality of racial discrimination.

With its distorted reportage of the riots in Lhasa since March 14, CNN has brought shame on itself. If it had apologized and admitted fault, people in China wouldn’t “grasp its braid and not let go.” Up until now, CNN host Jack Cafferty has regularly lashed out at China and has seemed anxious to appear as a daring vanguard in the anti-China wave.

Chinese nationals, out of sincere, heartfelt love for their native land and for the Olympic spirit, have welcomed the arrival of the Olympic torch and oppose the sabotage by “Tibet independence” elements. This also represents the fond feelings of humanity and mirrors the sentiments of other races in the United States. Nevertheless, Jack Cafferty took a personal stand and has shouted publicly abuses as if he had been personally stung.

It seems that the CNN host is really annoyed. And once he turns irrational, he betrays his true “colors.” Whereas Chinese netizens use the word “naked run” to denounce CNN’s distorted reporting, I believe using that very word to describe Cafferty is most appropriate.

In fact, whether it’s U.S. Speaker Nancy Pelosi exploiting the “Tibet issue” to safeguard her “moral authority,” Jack Cafferty vilifying Chinese or certain media organs assaulting China over the so-called human rights issue, those who oppose anything related to China betray an intrinsic sense of moral superiority which has led them to discriminate against China.

Cafferty’s vile remarks have reminded me of an account in the book The Chinese in America by Iris Chang , the late Chinese-American author. During the in the 1870s, a large-scale anti-China wave erupted in the western part of the United States. In 1882, the U.S. federal government passed the Chinese Exclusion Act , outlawing Chinese immigration to the United States. Chinese Americans were then described as demons and ghosts, “octopuses” from the east and evil creatures from Asia. In its editorial, a California newspaper in 1979 went so far as to smear Chinese as the half-human-half demon who eat rats, wear rags and who know nothing about law or Christian culture … The U.S. Congress didn’t annul the act until 1943. But despite irrational Act’s abrogation by the U.S. Congress, the idea of racial discrimination remains deeply-rooted in the inner worlds of Cafferty and his ilk.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing foreign press coverage of the unfolding crisis surrounding China and the Olympics.

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 17th, 2008 at 8:15 am and is filed under Nancy Pelosi, Racism, Human Rights, CNN, Hypocrisy, Freedom of Speech, Media Criticism, Law & Legal Matters, History, China, Foreign Affairs, Immigration, Business. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

“Screw ‘Em”; or, Hillary’s Hypocrisy »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.