Colombians Lose as Pelosi, Democrats Play Politics With Trade …

April 15th, 2008 by WILLIAM KERN

[El Espectador, Colombia]

Have Nancy Pelosi and Congressional Democrats done Colombia wrong on trade? That seems to be the general consensus in that country, Washington’s strongest ally in Latin America. For Colombia’s leading newspaper El Tiempo, Alfredo Rangel writes in part:

“Mrs. Pelosi has gotten her way. With her repeated rejection of the Free Trade Agreement, congressional Democrats are favoring the economic interests of a few U.S. unions and are sacrificing the general interests of Colombia under the pretext of protecting a union minority - the alleged victims of a State that has abandoned them. But behind her apparently humanitarian arguments, it’s clear to everyone that petty electoral interests are being concealed here. The debate over the Free Trade Agreement has been postponed based purely on domestic electoral calculations, in order to pressure the government to grant subsidies to certain U.S. industries. The condition of unionists in Colombia is just a pretext.”

By Alfredo Rangel

Translated By Douglas Myles Rasmussen

April 13, 2008

Colombia - El Tiempo - Original Article (Spanish)

Mrs. Pelosi has gotten her way. With her repeated rejection of the Free Trade Agreement, congressional Democrats are favoring the economic interests of a few U.S. unions and are sacrificing the general interests of Colombia under the pretext of protecting a union minority - the alleged victims of a State that has abandoned them. But behind her apparently humanitarian arguments, it’s clear to everyone that petty electoral interests are being concealed here. The debate over the Free Trade Agreement has been postponed based purely on domestic electoral calculations, in order to pressure the government to grant subsidies to certain U.S. industries. The condition of unionists in Colombia is just a pretext.

In fact as everyone recognizes, in Colombia there has been an overall improvement in the security situation, and hence the protection of human rights. And this improvement has been particularly marked in the case of trade unions. The current government has made more of an effort than previous governments, and this has been reflected in the very positive results that have been achieved. Colombia today is far from being a union firing squad, as unfortunately it was in previous years due to irregular groups.

That remarkable improvement has been a result of the combined impact of dismantling the vast majority of paramilitary groups, the decline in guerrilla violence to less than half what it was five years ago, the almost complete disappearance of the dirty war between those irregular groups, greater efficiency in the justice system and the expansion of programs to protect trade unionists.

Consider the facts. According to the AFL-CIO, the leading U.S. trade union, in 2001 there were 213 union members murdered in Colombia. According to the Ministry of Social Protection, in the year 2006 that figure dropped to 60 murders and in 2007 was cut to 26. Furthermore, according to the U.S. Attorney General’s Office, the majority of those deaths were not politically motivated, nor were there connections between trade unions and the victims. Rather, they were cases of robbery, crimes of passion or other non-political causes.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 15th, 2008 at 5:04 am and is filed under Nancy Pelosi, Law Enforcement, Civil Liberties, Columnists, Foreign Politics, Cartoons, Human Rights, NAFTA, Newsweek Blogitics, State Department, Newspapers, Corporations, Cartoon Commentary, Congress, Economy, 2008 Elections, Politics, Law & Legal Matters, Foreign Affairs, Legislation, Americas - N & S, Democrats, Latin America (Central/South), Political Cartoons, Business. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Quinnipiac Poll: Clinton Has Stopped Obama Momentum In Pennsylvania »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.