Advice For Mitt Romney: Beware Of Too Much Crying

December 19th, 2007
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

Vulnerability isn’t a bad trait in a Presidential candidate. After all, Bill Clinton’s emotional bite on the his lip didn’t hurt him and President George Bush’s eyes have misted up at times.

But earlier this week former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney seemingly entered The Danger Zone by generating two reports in several days time about his eyes misting up on TV. Warning to Romney: You are in danger of being typecast. Unless you’re trying to get into the Guinness Book of World Records, turn off the waterworks now or it’ll become a media theme and a punchline for late night comics (once they get back on the air after settling the writers strike mess).

Romney first misted up
when recalling how he felt when he heard his LDS Church admitted blacks to the priesthood in 1978. And, then, a day later, he misted up when he talked about how he felt in seeing a casket of a fallen soldier killed in Iraq and imagining it could have been one of his sons.

Fortunately for Romney, his two eye-mistings in two days happened when Jay Leno and David Lettermen were in re-runs due to the writers’ strike. And there is a larger political danger.

The danger is that politicians, cable talk shows, radio hosts and the media (which includes blogs such as this) all type-cast. And it won’t help Romney’s image in a time when Rudy Giuliani is running around the country, jutting his chin out and beating his chest proclaiming that he going to be tougher on terrorism than the Democrats for the former Massachusetts Governor to be perceived as someone courting the tear-duct vote.

Just many Dr. Phil voters are there out there, anyway?

Still, the AP notes
that crying isn’t always a handicap these days — for men, at least:

But for a candidate who sometimes comes across as cool and detached, showing a little emotion may not be something to cry about.

The nation has come a long way in the 35 years since a New Hampshire sob story ended Sen. Edmund Muskie’s 1972 presidential campaign. Muskie’s campaign slid off the tracks after it was reported that he had cried in response to a newspaper attack on his wife. He went to his grave maintaining that it had been melted snowflakes, not a tear, in his eye.

Fifteen years later, in 1987, former Democratic Rep. Pat Schroeder got grief for crying as she announced that she would not be a presidential candidate. She’s still catching flak about it today, mostly from women….

“Oh, my gosh, I got a devastating e-mail about it from a woman writer just a couple of days ago,” Schroeder said in an interview. “I want to say, ‘Wait a minute, we are talking 20 years ago.’ It’s like I ruined their lives, 20 years ago, with three seconds of catching my breath.”

Schroeder says she used to keep a “crying file” on weepy politician episodes, but it got so huge she threw it out.

“Guys have been tearing up all along and people think it’s marvelous,” Schroeder said, pointing to episodes stretching back to Ronald Reagan.

But for female candidates, crying clearly is still in the no-fly zone. Hillary Rodham Clinton is not allowed to cry. At least not in public.

David Knowles has looked at Romney’s teariness and raised an eyebrow:

Of course, one might not be so cynical about Romney’s tears were it not for one of his now-famous PowerPoint presentations back in February. In it, Romney laid out his battle plan to win the nomination. Included in the 77-slide document was, among other things, a push for Romney to deliver his JFK-Mormon speech at the Bush library, and an admission that Mitt’s hair might be “too perfect.” Humanizing Romney has been on the campaign’s radar screen (not to mention its PowerPoint screen) for a while.

(Read comments under that post, by the way. Romney’s supporters insist he really didn’t cry. if so, they need to contact the news agencies and have them correct all the news reports about the incidents…)

But in these days when Hollywood, the mainstream news media, and bloggers all deal in “high concept” easy to understand instant-images, Romney’s wet eyes could prove to be a problem.

Note the reaction of Right Wing News’ John Hawkins:

How many times is Mitt Romney going to cry in public? Moreover, why is he blubbering so much now? Did some focus group conclude that he needs to come across more like a girlish metrosexual? Is he having an emotional breakdown? Is the poor dear just too much of a sensitive soul to be President?

PS: Bonus question — will he cry again if he loses Iowa to Huckabee?

PS #2: Crying like a little girl in public ruined Ed Muskie’s campaign back in 1972. Now, Romney has gotten all emotional twice in as many days. Whimpering like a little wussy in public doesn’t exactly engender confidence that Romney has what it takes to be President of the United States.

PS #3: The fact that Romney got so upset over a question about his church is particularly disturbing because he is going to get those questions over and over again if he’s the nominee. So how many times would this guy end up crying his eyes out by the end of 2008?

If Romney doesn’t watch it, he may wind up with THIS as his new campaign song:




This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 19th, 2007 at 9:51 am and is filed under Mitt Romney, Newsweek Blogitics, Republicans, Media Criticism, 2008 Elections, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.