Mitt Romney Will Address Mormon Religion “Issue”

December 2nd, 2007
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

It’s an issue that has lurked in the background.

An issue some insisted isn’t an issue.

But it is enough of an issue that former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney is getting ready to talk about his religion — having to go down a path that John F. Kennedy felt he had to go down when he ran for President 47 years ago.

Now, just one month from the first contest of the 2008 presidential election campaign, with Romney’s apparent advantage in first-caucusing Iowa slipping to a Southern Baptist pastor from Arkansas, former Gov. Mike Huckabee, Romney plans to address the issue that is troubling many of his party’s most conservative, religious voters. His Mormonism.

This is in a sense long overdue. The buzz about religion as an issue few will want to admit is REALLY an issue has been out there for some time. Clearly, not addressing it head-on and with specificity doesn’t address the fact that in American life there still seem to be groups about which it is not politically incorrect to be a bigot.

The venue of Romney’s planned address on religion will be cause for gossip of its own: At the George H.W. Bush Presidential Library in College Station, Texas., with an introduction promised by the 41st president. The former president’s son, Jeb, already has steered most of his closest advisers, strategists and supporters to Romney’s campaign, while President Bush has remained neutral in his party’s nominating contest.

So Romney is the Jeb Bush wing of the GOP’s favorite candidate. Will some say it’s an endorsement by the Bushies? Yep:

The campaign says tonight that no endorsement should be read into the venue. But the mere stage for Thursday’s speech by Romney, confronting a question that could be central to his bid for the GOP’s presidential nomination, is likely to stir speculation about the Bush clan’s backing.

Romney’s address will be called “Faith in America,” his campaign announced this evening.

With polls showing that four in 10 of all likely Republican voters consider themselves Christian conservatives, polling also shows that one quarter of all evangelical Christians voice doubts about voting for a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.

Just last month, at a convention in Billings, Montana, I had a talk with an entertainer who is Mormon. He was surprised to hear me say: “If Mitt Romney was not Mormon, he would be a shoo in for the Republican nomination.” He was surprised because he and some Mormons feel that way — and they are perhaps correct.

True, Romney has changed or finessed his positions often — but that is not unheard of in politics. He is the most telegenic of all candidates: he LOOKS Presidential. He is a slick speaker. And, if ideological purity isn’t the issue but getting things done is, he has proven to be a doer.

Now, this doer is on the rocks
.

In the past month, the one ordained Southern Baptist minister in the race, Huckabee, a former Christian broadcaster as well, has gained new momentum in his bid for the Republican Party’s presidential nomination, challenging Romney in a state where the former governor of Massachusetts had won the Iowa Republican Party’s straw poll last summer.

This week’s speech could be the defining moment of Romney’s campaign for president. It is, in many ways, decades later, the same speech that Kennedy delivered in Houston, in 1960.


EDITOR’s NOTE:
“Defining moment” is a journalist cliche as puke-inducing now as “he tried to change the subject.” “He “tried to change the subject” is usually used by the media to suggest that a candidate who won’t talk about what the media wants to talk about (The Flavor Of The Story) is somehow trying to avoid talking about something, rather than simply discussing another issue.

But in this case it is correct.

Romney has to deal with this issue head-on because the trending indicates that otherwise his candidacy is not going to flower. There IS anti-Mormon bigotry out there (as well as many voters who simply don’t like him).

ALSO OF INTEREST:

Time to Channel JFK

Why a Mormon Speech?

Will ‘Pulling a JFK’ Be Enough for Romney?




This entry was posted on Sunday, December 2nd, 2007 at 8:16 pm and is filed under Mitt Romney. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.