« Gay trend watch: wed on vacation, honeymoon at home!
Tall Paul, Not So Tall Ben »



“Support the Troops”: Finally Not Just Rhetoric

June 27th, 2008
By DORIAN DE WIND

Print Print

Pressured by countless telephone calls, tens of thousands petition signatures and letters to Capitol Hill, thousands of letters to the editor, and hundreds of columns and opinion pieces (hopefully one or two of mine included therein) a sufficient number of Republican Senators have joined their Democratic colleagues to overwhelmingly–I.e. “veto proof”–pass Senator Webb’s version of the 21st Century GI Bill.

In a strong show of true support for our troops, last night, 77 U.S. Senators voted in favor of the GI bill, including my home state Senator Cornyn, who finally saw the light and did the right thing. Twenty-one other Senators–all Republicans–voted “Nay,” including the “wide stance” Senator from Idaho.

There were only two Senators absent for this important vote. One was Ted Kennedy who is recovering from brain surgery. The other, Sen. John McCain, who has fought the Webb bill tooth and nail. McCain, President Bush and a few others at first claimed, in an unbelievably misplaced penny pinching mode, that the bill “would cost too much.“ When that didn’t fly, they postulated that the bill would hurt retention–a claim that was quickly countered by a Congressional Budget Office analysis that found any possible losses in retention caused by this bill would be balanced by the increases in recruitment it would generate.

As far as the president goes–the other opponent of the more fair and generous Webb bill–according to the Washington Post:

In a 92 to 6 vote, the Senate yesterday approved unrestricted funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that allows continuation of the current military course of action through the end of President Bush’s term and beyond. In exchange for that unencumbered freedom to operate in Iraq, Bush agreed to demands by congressional Democrats to create a new higher-education benefit for veterans and their families, and to extend unemployment benefits (Emphasis mine)

After initially fighting the education provisions of the GI Bill, because they would “cost too much,“ Bush (and McCain) demanded that the education benefit be transferable to spouses and children of veterans. Democrats complied and pushed the cost of the Webb bill to $62.8 billion over 11 years.

The improved Webb GI Bill now goes to the President, attached to the 2008 war supplemental. Let’s hope that, this time, the President will truly support our troops and promptly and unequivocally (no signing statements) will sign the bill.



This entry was posted on Friday, June 27th, 2008 at 8:44 am and is filed under Military Affairs, Senate, Larry Craig, Ted Kennedy, Veterans, Jim Webb, John McCain, Republicans, Legislation, Congress, Military, Democrats, George W. Bush, Education. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 4 Comments

 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Gay trend watch: wed on vacation, honeymoon at home!
Tall Paul, Not So Tall Ben »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.