North Africa Nothing But ‘Butter in the Eyes’ of Bush

May 3rd, 2008 by WILLIAM KERN

There is angst on North Africa - otherwise known as the Maghreb - over the second-class treatment meted out to the region by the Bush Administration.

And since this is where the Pentagon intends to headquarter its new African Command - and since it hosts a blossoming al-Qaeda presence - this is not an inconsequential matter.

In the latest in a series of articles WORLDMEETS.US has translated that one might call “we can’t get no repect,” Abdelkamel K. writes for Algeria’s Liberte newspaper:

“During his eight years of presence at the White House, George W. Bush has rarely shown concern for the countries of the Maghreb, despite their strategic importance to U.S. policy in the region. … the Bush Administration continues to ignore these five countries … everyone knows the important role that Saudi Arabia plays in the politics of George Bush, as it remains Washington’s gas pump; and Egypt, which is regarded as the linchpin of U.S.-Arab relations; but other countries in the region are nothing but butter in the eyes of the White House boss.”

By Abdelkamel K.

Translated By Sandrine Ageorges

May 2, 2008

Algeria - Liberte - Home Page (French)

During his eight years of presence at the White House, George W. Bush has rarely shown concern for the countries of the Maghreb, despite their strategic importance to U.S. policy in the region.

Neither he nor his number two, nor his main collaborator Condoleezza Rice, have made a visit - although they have made many trips to neighboring countries. With the exception of former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, whose missions were purely technical and military and who once made a lightning tour to the Maghreb, the Bush Administration has showed no real interest or consideration for the countries concerned.

It must be said that the occasions on which the tenant of the Oval office has referred to North African states can be counted on the fingers of one hand. As for the idea of doing a tour, such a thing surely hasn’t even crossed his mind. And yet important connections exist between the United-States and these countries. While these ties differ from one country to another, they are all certainly worthy of a bit more consideration.

With Algeria, the rapport that used to be based almost entirely on economic issues has expanded to include collaboration in other areas, particularly with regard to security. This is due chiefly to the terrorist threat that emerged after the transformation of the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat into the al-Qaeda of the Maghreb, which has had ramifications for Morocco, Mauritania and in Tunisia.

As for Morocco, it has been considered a true ally of Washington because it hosts U.S. military bases, to say nothing of the large-scale trade relations between the two countries. Even Tunisia maintains a significant relationship with Uncle Sam, especially since Zine el-Abidine Benali came to power. Just to remind you, the Tunisian President is a career soldier that was trained at the famed West Point Military Academy.

And Libya is not to be outdone. Tripoli, which made great efforts on the issue of human rights, has also renounced the use of weapons of mass destruction in order to rejoin the family of nations.

READ ON AT WORLDMEETS.US, along with continuing translated foreign press coverage of how the world perceives our nation.

This entry was posted on Saturday, May 3rd, 2008 at 2:33 pm and is filed under Military Affairs, Donald Rumsfeld, White House, Al Qaeda, Bush Administration, Mideast, State Department, Pentagon, Islamism, Foreign Policy, Columnists, Condoleezza Rice, Africa, War On Terror, Iraq, Military, Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, Foreign Politics, Terrorism, Saudi Arabia, Foreign Affairs. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Let’s Avoid Equine Analogies in Politics »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.