« Panic? Dow Drops Anyway As Fed Cuts Rate 0.75 Amid World Nervousness
No Surprise: Fred’s Out »



Huckster with a Vengeance

January 22nd, 2008
By MICHAEL STICKINGS, Assistant Editor

Print Print

Does Mike Huckabee have it in for Mitt Romney?

Much food for thought:

For people reading between the lines, Mike Huckabee’s concession speech here Saturday night dropped some enticing hints that his presidential campaign now has an agenda other than getting elected president.

Huckabee’s new role: Mitt killer.

The former Arkansas governor threw air kisses on primary night to winner John McCain, praising him for “running a civil and a good and a decent campaign.”

He also signaled clearly that he is staying in the race, despite losing three straight states. Exit polls in South Carolina indicated — as they had in the previous three contests — that Huckabee did virtually nil with voters beyond his base of conservative evangelicals, raising doubts that he has a plausible path to the GOP nomination.

But as long as Huckabee is campaigning vigorously, he is likely to draw a sizable bloc of social conservatives — and deny former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney the direct one-on-one contest he is hoping for against McCain.

Huckabee did not mention Romney in his concession statement Saturday. But Huckabee and his aides have barely disguised their disdain for Romney, whose chameleon-like stance on issues and free-spending negative ad campaign have made him the most unpopular candidate among his GOP rivals.

Could Huckabee be angling for the No. 2 spot on McCain’s ticket, or a Cabinet position in a McCain administration?

Well, sure, maybe. It’s possible.

And it would make sense. Huckabee did extremely well with evangelical christianists in South Carolina, that is, with his base of right-wing Christian social conservative ideologues, but his campaign as a viable candidate with a shot of winning is basically over. His support is strong in one of the GOP’s core constituencies, but he doesn’t have much support anywhere else. He may stay in the race, but he won’t win the nomination.

So why not look to the Veep spot?

It is my contention that the race is Romney’s to lose — see here and here — and I have suggested a possible Romney-Huckabee ticket. And whatever the personal and political animosity, there is no reason to conclude definitively that Romney wouldn’t ask him and that Huckabee wouldn’t accept.

I may, however, have underestimated the extent and intensity of that animosity, at least from Huckabee’s perspective, and it may very well be that he prefers McCain to Romney, and perhaps definitively so. If so, he may be right to remain in the campaign.

Romney would beat McCain (and perhaps handily) in a two-man race, I think, with much of the GOP establishment backing Romney against a man they still distrust, if not loathe, but Huckabee’s continued presence in the race as a strong third candidate would, I think, keep him from pulling in enough christianists and social conservatives to put McCain away without a protracted fight. Romney could still win a three-man race, or even a race with a more crowded field, but he wouldn’t be able to do so quite as easily as if he were in it along against McCain.

Meanwhile, for his part, McCain will suffer as long as Thompson and Giuliani, two of his natural allies, stay in the race. It may be, then, that his best-case scenario is for Huckabee to stay in the race and for Thompson and Giuliani to get out sooner rather than later. (And a McCain-Huckabee ticket could be formidable.)

Even then, though, it is not clear that Huckabee’s support from christianists and social conservatives and implicit (for it is certainly not explicit) support for McCain would translate into enough of a drag on Romney to put McCain over the top. Romney still has a decisive and perhaps insurmountable advantage over McCain, I think, in all-Republican primaries where money/advertising and extensive/effective ground campaigns matter. McCain is the likeable, straight-talking guy who does well in states like New Hampshire, where more personal interaction with voters is stressed, that is, where door-to-door and pancake-breakfast campaigning is what matters, but Romney is the image-conscious guy who can get his message out on a mass scale.

In other words, Mike may want to be a Mitt-killer, but it may not matter. The race, I repeat, is still Mitt’s to lose. John has a shot, to be sure, but his battle is still an uphill one.

(Cross-posted from The Reaction.)



This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008 at 9:50 am and is filed under Mike Huckabee, Newsweek Blogitics, John McCain, Mitt Romney, 2008 Elections, Republicans, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 3 Comments

 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Panic? Dow Drops Anyway As Fed Cuts Rate 0.75 Amid World Nervousness
No Surprise: Fred’s Out »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.