The Law of Unintended Consequences & The Great Huckaboom Freak-Out

December 20th, 2007 by SHAUN MULLEN, TMV Columnist

01ahuck_guitar.jpg

The Law of Unintended Consequences has been getting a vigorous workout in this campaign season. I’m not talking about Hillary Clinton’s Straight Smear Express, which ends up having to apologize every time it tries to run Barack Obama off the road. Or the fact that Rudy Giuliani’s poll numbers are sinking faster than a mob victim wearing concrete shoes as voters find out what’s behind that snarky smile.

No, the really big story is that after years of determinedly tearing down the GOP Big Tent in an effort to pander to evangelical Christians, Mike Huckabee threatens to break out of the pack with the first primaries and caucuses less than a month away.

The result is widespread panic among the ranks of Republican regulars.

But as Rod Dreher notes at CrunchyCon, this panic is not because Huckabee is an ideal candidate for the folks whom the regulars invited to hijack their party. Of course he is. They’re freaked because he would be the dream candidate for another group with some say about who the next president might be — the Democrats.

Rick Moran, opining at Pajamas Media, believes an upshot of the Huckaboom will be a great conservative crack-up that has been long in the offing because (get this) he is viewed as a George Bush clone in that he would be a big-government conservative.

Huckabee supporters complain that folks like myself are making too big a deal over his Christian bona fides, but the guy certainly isn’t running on his experience as a mediocre governor beholden to special interests who comes off sounding like Barney Fife when he talks about law and order and Billy Graham when the subject is foreign policy.

John Cole shed his conservative Republican hair shirt not long ago because he was scratching himself to death. He writes at Balloon Juice that if party regulars try to derail the Huckaboom and flip the nomination to someone like Giuliani they’ll just end up infuriating those evangelical benefactors.

What makes this application of the Law of Unintended Consequences so delicious is that we’re in the midst of the first wide-open Republican presidential race in forever. The biggest reason for this is that the party is badly splintered. The party is badly splintered because it sold its soul. And the guy who is threatening to turn the field on its collective ear says his early success is because God is on his side.

This entry was posted on Thursday, December 20th, 2007 at 11:05 am and is filed under Mike Huckabee, Evangelicals, Republican Party, Newsweek Blogitics, Primaries, Rudy Giuliani, Barack Obama, Conservatives, Polls, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, 2008 Elections. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

11 responses about “The Law of Unintended Consequences & The Great Huckaboom Freak-Out”

  1. Dave Schuler said:

    As I’ve written frequently over at my place the coalition among the social conservatives, small government conservatives, libertarians, and country club Republicans has never been a comfortable one. Both parties have their dirty laundry.

  2. DLS said:

    The reality is that both Giuliani and Romney are RINOs from places with politics and reputations alien to and antithetical to normal non-liberal Americans.

    Huckabee is actually appealing. And yes, if he were to continue to rise in popularity after Iowa (the current idiotic hysterical overreaction to his early rise in popularity is unjustified; people should grow up and wait until at least the New Hampshire election is over and better, the elections on February 5), the liberal media will crucify him, pun intended.

  3. Entropy said:

    Good post Shaun!

    “Straight Smear Express” - I love it!

  4. bellisaurius said:

    So, if the great conservative crack appears, does that mean the GOP will shift leftward (at least on social issues)?

    God, that’d be great. I could pick a candidate I agree with for a change….

  5. AZChas said:

    Iraq has created unity among the normally back-biting Democrats, for sure, and Huckabee’s Christianity is revolting to the country club Republicans. But I predict that if Hillary becomes the candidate from the left, there will be a great new wave of anti-Democratic unity among Republicans, even if they end up nominating Huckabee’s dog for president.

  6. DLS said:

    Nobody’s going to want Bloomberg (junk gun lawsuits = DQ by Americans) unless Hillary Clinton got extra repellent.

    If Huckabee were to be doing well, and the liberal media attacks and Dem attacks (huge overlap) had people worried about Huckabee’s chances against Clinton, do you know what the GOP might do?

    It’s Sam’s ultimate nightmare, but predictable.

    “draft Jeb Bush”

  7. superdestroyer said:

    What the fear of huckabee really is, is the realization of those in the Republican party that they are no longer a national political party and are becoming irrelevant to the political process. There is almost no chance that the Republican nominee will win in 2008 and the Republican are going to lose a large number of seats in both the house and Senate.

    Given the demographic changes in the U.S., the Republican Party also is realizing that there will be no coming back from being a minority party.

    Just think, the next president of the U.S. will probably be decided by the Middle of February and the U.S. will experience the longest transition period that it will ever experience. The government will go over 18 months with nothing meaningful occurring.

  8. JSpencer said:

    If the republican party (the 21st century incarnation) really is coming apart at the seams, then perhaps I’ll need to re-evaluate my contention that god is uninterested in politics. ;-)

  9. safariman said:

    t’this may or may not be of any consequence. I read the Washington Post analasis of the strength in women of Mike Huckabee to my wife and asked her thoughts. she said she wasnt surprised because Mike made her feel “safe”. This from the most non political person I know. This might be something for someone to pursue.

  10. JSpencer said:

    “And the guy who is threatening to turn the field on its collective ear says his early success is because God is on his side.”

    Ah yes, an effective strategy going back thousands of years - and probably all the way to caveman days. What’s the saying? The more things change, the more they stay the same. Sure nuff.

  11. casualobserver said:

    The last place on earth one should consult for insight into mainstream American voter minds is a political blog.

Who Taught Mitt Romney To Cry? »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.