It’s Huckabee Versus Romney In A Fierce Iowa Rumble

December 19th, 2007
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

fighting_elephants_787493.jpg

The raging political news has been the fierce battle between Democratic Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama in Iowa — but now the ferocity of that battle is being matched by warring statehouse GOPers Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.

And this battle royal of the elephants — reflecting state and national polls that when taken together now indicate a wide open race for the 2008 Republican nomination — isn’t pretty:

With some of the strongest language he’s ever used — words such as “ruthless,” “dishonest,” “desperate” — Mike Huckabee, the normally sunny former governor of Arkansas criticized his chief challenger in Iowa, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who has been attacking him fiercely in person, in TV ads and in mailings as Huckabee passes him in polls here.

“He’s been attacking me just ruthlessly in the mail and on television and distorting the record,” Huckabee told a throng of reporters in a mall parking lot. “And I think we need to get the record straightened up. And get the truth out. … The attacks have been desperate, and I think they’ve been dishonest.”

Asked if his and Romney’s fighting might not create an opening for a third candidate, Huckabee smiled. “I don’t plan to fight with him. He’s throwing punches and I’m saying Merry Christmas.”

“You need to look at this with some sense of sympathy,” he continued. “Here’s a guy who has outspent me 20-to-1 here, and he’s behind.”

Polls seem to be driving this latest slugfest. One new poll documents what many Romney supporters have feared: that anti-Mormon sentiment is holding Romney back in Iowa and propelling the Huckabee surge.

The Washington Post notes that the Iowa race has now boiled down to a fight to the political death between Romney and Huckabee:

The race for Iowa’s Republican caucuses has narrowed to a two-person battle between former governors Mike Huckabee of Arkansas and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts, with Huckabee now perched atop the field, propelled by a big jump in support among religious women.

The findings, from a new Washington Post-ABC News poll, show how dramatically the wide-open GOP contest has changed over the past few months. Huckabee’s support in Iowa has quadrupled since the summer, while former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuiliani and former senator Fred D. Thompson (Tenn.) have lost ground.

Immigration now stands as the top issue for the state’s GOP voters. Many Republicans think voter anger over illegal immigration will be a flash point, not only in the race for their party’s presidential nomination but also in the general election. The emergence of immigration as a major issue in Iowa, where three in 10 GOP voters call it a top concern, creates an early test of its political potency.

With two weeks to go before the first-in-the-nation caucuses, Huckabee registered the support of 35 percent of likely Republican caucus-goers, just above Romney, the longtime Iowa front-runner, at 27 percent. For the first time in Post-ABC Iowa polling, no other candidate registered in double digits.

How has Romney attacked? He has gone after Huckabee for criticizing President George Bush’s foreign policy style in an article in the venerable magazine Foreign Affairs:

Romney, who has lost a big lead to Huckabee in Iowa, sought to raise doubts about his rival’s foreign policy credentials, saying his criticism of Bush’s foreign policy was more suitable for a Democrat than a Republican.

Last week, Huckabee said the Bush administration’s “arrogant bunker mentality has been counterproductive at home and abroad” and promised that he as president would reach out to the rest of the world.

“I think Gov. Huckabee made a significant error in insulting the president as being subject to an arrogant bunker mentality,” Romney said in Davenport, Iowa. “I disagree with that. I think the president is a man who has acted out of a desire to do what is right for America.”

In this, Romney is playing solidly to the GOP’s still-loyal-to-Bush base — while Huckabee seems to be playing to Republicans critical of Bush 43’s style (which would include members of the Bush 41 administration who relied more on diplomacy than on the military)…and to the general election electorate. Romney has also strongly supported the Bush administration’s warrant-less wiretapping, to draw a contrast between his loyalty to Bush and Huckabee’s.

But it’s the trending in polling that is likely fueling Romney’s attacks on Huckabee: yet another poll shows the Arkansas Governor pulling ahead in South Carolina.

So these two candidates whose beliefs in God have gotten so much attention are battling it out — and where will it end?

Heaven only knows.




This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 19th, 2007 at 9:44 pm and is filed under Newsweek Blogitics, Primaries, Iowa, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, 2008 Elections, Polls, Republicans, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.