« Sounds Like a Big Deal to Me!
Races, Faces, and Integrated Spaces »



Notes on “Reclaiming Control of U.S. Security in the Middle East”

June 27th, 2007
By Michael van der Galien


The day before yesterday, Matthew Yglesias linked to a report by the Center for American Progress on Iraq, called “Reclaiming Control of U.S. Security in the Middle East.” He read it in its entirety, I only read the summary I am afraid, but it does sound very interesting, so I will try to read more of the report in the coming days (busy busy busy). For now, some excerpts, notes, etc. Of course, I strongly urge you all to read the report yourself.

Page 1.
“active steps to stabilize the entire Middle East.”

“The United States has no good options giving the strategic and tactical mistakes made on Iraq since 2002, but simply staying the course with an indefinite military presence is not serving U.S. interests.”

“the United States must reset its strategy by looking beyond the deteriorating in Iraq in order to counter the threat from global terrorist groups and ensure stability in the entire Middle East and Gulf region. To do this, we need to develop a new overall Middle East strategy, not just a series of tactics focused heavily on Iraq.”

Page 2.
Their new plan:
1* Accept the reality of Iraq’s political fragmentation.
2* Implement a phased military redeployment from Iraq within one year.
3* Initiate regional security and diplomatic efforts to contain Iraq’s conflicts.
4* Develop a strategy to devolve the Arab-Israeli conflict and stabilize the Middle East.

Page 3.
“Neither U.S. troops in and around Baghdad nor diplomats in the Green Zone can force Iraqi leaders to hold their country together… even if the security situation does improve, there will not be significant progress on the government side.”

Quote an Iraqi student: “Our situation is really tragic. We are surrounded on all sides and can’t do anything. Whichever side you work with, you end up being targeted by the other, and the worse thing is that there are more than two sides.”

Page 4-6
“A recent National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq noted that ‘the term “civil war” does not adequately describe these multiple, overlapping conflicts in Iraq or adequately capture their complexity as they also include extensive Shi’a, Al Qaeda, and Sunni insurgents attacks on U.S. forces, and widespread criminally-motivated violence.’ The United States cannot settle Iraq’s many internal conflicts even with its considerable conventional military power, particularly since the use of this military power is employed in an overall approach to the Middle East and the threat of global terrorist networks that is partial and incomplete.”

Furthermore, the U.S. needs to stop “passively waiting for Iraq’s national leaders” to work out the problems and “adopt a more active stance to advance its interests throughout the Middle East. In short, the United States needs to implement a strategic reset aimed at using U.S. power to protect our core national interests. The four simultaneous steps” the US must take: see image.

For more information about those steps (what they exactly mean), I suggest reading this part of the report. It is also worth mentioning that the Center for American Progress believes that “the ISG’s set of recommendations aimed at Iraq has been overtaken by events – the ISG was examining an Iraq that simply does not exist anymore” (page 6). The plan of the CAP however, “recognizes the grim realities of Iraq’s fragmentation and the fundamentally changed regional dynamics.” The CAP recommends “shifting U.S. priorities from refereeing Iraq’s multiple conflicts to aggressive counterterrorism alongside multiple efforts to stabilize the region.” According to the CAP, they “advance a more pragmatic approach aimed at garnering necessary international support for Iraq while taking the fight to our real terrorist enemies.”

Page 8.
Lastly, “in the next year, the United States needs to refocus its Middle East regional strategy by”:
- Developing crisis management strategies to address more effectively the fallout from conflicts such as the intra-Palestinian battles in the spring of 2007.
- Using regional and international proposals to provide a diplomatic framework to move the Arab-Israeli conflict toward resolution.
- Engaging in diplomacy with U.S. rivals such as Iran and Syria similar to the way the United States negotiated with the Soviet Union and China in the Cold War.
- Offering smartly targeted rule-of-law assistance to reduce and eliminate security vacuums and help foster democratic values from the ground up.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 27th, 2007 at 11:39 am and is filed under Iraq, War, Liberals. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


« Sounds Like a Big Deal to Me!
Races, Faces, and Integrated Spaces »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.