« Happy 90th Birthday To Nelson Mandela
Poll: Independent Voters Unenthusiastic About Obama And McCain »



Photo Op or Listening Tour?

July 18th, 2008
By JAZZ SHAW, Assistant Editor

Print Print

You didn’t have to be paying terribly close attention in order to see a bit of a double reverse volley from the McCain campaign this week re: Obama’s overseas trip. For some time now, Senator McCain and his surrogates have been hectoring Barack Obama for failing to visit Afghanistan and taking too long between trips to Iraq. As I pointed out in a previous column, I find the original argument faulty, as almost all of these trips by any candidate are junkets of questionable value, and the McCain team was just setting a trap for Obama anyway.

The Illinois Senator hadn’t even finished loading his luggage on board Messiah One, (sorry… I couldn’t resist) when the two prong trap was sprung. First, McCain surrogate Jill Hazelbaker leapt into action.

“Let’s drop the pretense that this is a fact-finding trip and call it what it is–the first of its kind campaign rally overseas,” … During a later appearance on MSNBC she also called the trip “one giant photo opportunity…not designed to inform his world view.”

She was clearly referring to the entire trip when I watched this interview, not just the European portion. At that same time, however, Senator McCain took time out on the Straight Talk Express to give a different message.

“I’m glad that he is (traveling overseas) and pleased that he is going to Iraq for only the second time and going to Afghanistan for the first time,” McCain said. “I can only give you my opinion, and I will talk to (Hazelbaker). But the fact is, I’m glad that he’s going to Iraq and I think it’s - I’m glad that he’s going to Afghanistan. It’s long, long overdue, if you want to lead this nation and secure our national security.”

This is a tactic we’re seeing from both campaigns far too often and it’s beginning to get tiresome. Send out a surrogate to deliver the dirt while the candidate waves it away and takes the high road. It was a bit of a relief to see that Senator McCain dropped the portion of the speech where he talks about Obama not holding committee meetings on Afghanistan, and that’s probably good timing, considering that we recently learned that McCain’s record on this score isn’t exactly spotless.

It turns out that presumptive Republican nominee Sen. John McCain has attended even fewer Afghanistan-related Senate hearings over the past two years than Obama’s one. Which is a nice way of saying, McCain, R-Ariz., the top Republican on the Senate Armed Service Committee, has attended zero of his committee’s six hearings on Afghanistan over the last two years.

The defense from the McCain campaign and his supporters regarding Hazelbaker’s comments is that Obama’s trip to Iraq and Afghanistan wouldn’t be a photo op excepting the fact that he’s still sticking to his “sixteen month troop removal plan” before even going on his “fact finding mission” this summer. I find these protestations unsatisfying in two regards.

First, they conveniently ignore the fact that Obama has repeatedly stated that the sixteen month goal is a target which may be modified as matters progress on the ground. Second, and more to the point, is the denial of the fundamental principle that the civilian government gives the orders to the military - not the other way around. The current Commander in Chief has issued directives that our military forces achieve victory in Iraq, regardless of how victory is being defined this month or how long it takes. That’s what they are doing, and in an admirable fashion. However, if we have a new civilian Commander in Chief next year who directs that the goal is now to achieve the fastest, safe draw-down of troops as possible and to turn over control of the country to the Iraqi government, that is what the generals will have to accomplish. Agree or disagree, if the majority of Americans wind up electing Obama, it’s also the “will of the nation” and it is not the military’s place to countermand that.

As a side note, this is a gambit by the McCain campaign which may still either pay off large dividends or backfire completely on them. Should Obama seriously stumble under the massive media glare during his international appearances, it could hurt him at the polls. However, if he pulls off the media aspect of this trip with aplomb and Americans are treated to a series of images of Obama reviewing the troops, meeting with foreign leaders and looking presidential in international settings, it could close the perception gap Americans seem to have about the two candidates’ relative strength on foreign policy and undercut McCain’s campaign efforts.



This entry was posted on Friday, July 18th, 2008 at 8:18 am and is filed under John McCain, Germany, Newsweek Blogitics, Barack Obama, Iraq, 2008 Elections, Europe, Middle East, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 5 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    The more I read about Obama, the more convinced I am he is a total fraud! He has spent his entire career in preparation for being elected President, without regard to the office itself, but just to satisfy his enormous ego! From taking credit for Emil Jones legislation to plump up his skeletal resume, to hiring 300 foreign policy advisers to prepare his talking points on a daily basis. They even provide him with possible questions and appropriate answers! Can this man even think for himself? Whose decisions will he be making if he gets elected POTUS? Whose puppet is he? Unfortunately, I don’t believe he cares about America or Americans. He is just in it to feed his already over-inflated ego. No experience, no qualifications, NOBAMA.
    • ^
    • v
    The traipsing overseas, safely protected by our troops in the Green Zones, for photo ops, is quite laughable. As close to really "putting your boots in the dirt" as it is going to Las Vegas. & McSame seems to be the one doing more of it. Wow, he's my pick, fer sure.
    Too bad he couldn't set aside some time to actually attend one or two of the Committee meetings regarding Afghanistan.
    • ^
    • v
    Yes, they are photo-ops and PR tours.
    There is no information about Iraq or Afghanistan "on the ground' that can't be had via e-mail, telephome, video conference calls and the like.

    A minor side benifit is the personal contact, the introduction , the hand shake.
    A biggger benifit would be talking to the troops without supervision by superiors, to boost morale and to hear their version of what 'on the ground ' means, as well as to relay information about what those 'on the ground' in areas other than their own are experiencing. 'On the ground' means diffferent things in different areas.

    In the end, though, it is civilain command and the CIC who make policy decisions.and assigns missions, not he other way around. . The boots on the ground are there to execuete policy, not to determine what it should be.
    McCain totally misunderstands that, and Bush uses it when it suits politics, not policy.
    • ^
    • v
    ??? It's bad enough that stupid people in New York were exploited by Hillary Clinton in the past, but how on earth can anyone today believe that this is a listening rather than an exposure tour? We who can be critical of Obama at least have our heads in the right place, unlike others.
    • ^
    • v
    "Yes, they are photo-ops and PR tours."

    Aimed at home rather than at the people there, though. Obama had to go to Iraq to show support for the troops, as well as tell Americans he'll be sane about any withdrawal, not do an immediate surrender-flight as the lunatics and US-haters at home have demanded. He raises serious political-economic concerns, which will be more precisely defined once he brings people into his Cabinet and we see if the Dems in Congress react wrongly to any strong Dem vote this year and lunge too far leftward, but I'm confident that he on his own wouldn't do anything stupid.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Happy 90th Birthday To Nelson Mandela
Poll: Independent Voters Unenthusiastic About Obama And McCain »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.