« Obama’s not quite Macaca moment, but “sweetie” reporter none too happy (UPDATED)
Ferrell-Fouts Award Nominee »



McCain: From 100 Years to Four

May 15th, 2008
By JAZZ SHAW, Assistant Editor

Print Print

Much ado has been made over Sen. John McCain’s previous comments regarding how it would be “fine with him” if American troops were in Iraq for the next 100 years, as well as his subsequent, controversial comparisons between that nation with post-war Germany and Japan. During a recent appearance in Ohio, however, McCain scaled back those plans a bit saying that we may “win” the war in Iraq in the next four years and bring the majority of our troops home.

Republican presidential candidate John McCain said on Thursday he believes the Iraq war can be “won” within four years, leaving a functioning democracy there and allowing most U.S. troops to come home.

McCain, running in the November election to succeed Bush in 2009, described a scenario he thought he could achieve within his first four-year term.

“By January 2013, America has welcomed home most of the servicemen and women who have sacrificed terribly so that America might be secure in her freedom,” McCain said in prepared remarks from a speech he was to deliver in Columbus, Ohio, on Thursday.

“The Iraq war has been won. Iraq is a functioning democracy, although still suffering from the lingering effects of decades of tyranny and centuries of sectarian tension. Violence still occurs, but it is spasmodic and much reduced,” McCain said.

McCain went on to repeat his previous point that any remaining American troops would only be there to “promote stability” and again compared the hypothetical post-war Iraq with the era immediately following World War Two.

It is an interesting hypothesis, but McCain will still need to determine if it is within the “cost vs. benefit” analysis for the majority of Americans. With U.S. casualties in Iraq spiking back up to 52 in April (up from a low of 29 in February) voters will need to decide if the percived benefit of the victory described will be worth between 1,500 and 2,000 more American troop deaths over that period. (estimate based on current rates.) This will be added to untold additional serious injuries and, of course, the mounting financial cost.

McCain’s comments will also raise additional questions for voters on exactly what the anticipated victory will look like and exactly how it will make us “more secure in our freedom.” The Iraqi government thus far has seemed to be plagued by endemic corruption, internal bickering, and a growing closeness with Iran. Even if a stable democracy is achieved, I believe we need to hear more about precisely how democratic it will be and what influence Iran will have on the nascent democracy.

Further, even assuming an independent, functional democracy in Iraq, how much influence would they have on other countries in the region we percieve as our enemies or the terrorist activity reaching out from those nations? In short, giving Senator McCain the benefit of the doubt and assuming we can achieve this version of victory in Iraq over the next four years, what is it that we will have purchased for the price being paid?

McCain’s proposed vision is a tempting one, and I would be less opposed to the idea of a four year path to real, meaningful victory than a 100 year long war. But I believe the Senator owes it to the voters to provide more specifics on exactly how we will arrive at that victory during his first term as well as providing detailed answers to the questions posed above.



This entry was posted on Thursday, May 15th, 2008 at 5:43 am and is filed under John McCain, Newsweek Blogitics, Iraq, War, 2008 Elections, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 3 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    4 years eh? Sounds like just enough time to pass the war on to the next in line. So much for accountability. I guess that must be a pretty outdated concept.
    • ^
    • v
    yeah... I guess the only thing is that anyone who wants to be President wants to bring the troops home. I wrote about it on my site:

    http://www.momswordorg ( McCain Sees Troops Home in 4 Years - is the name of the article)
    • ^
    • v
    So, what's McCain's plan?

    This isn't so different than his previous comments. As I recall McCain was one of the folks who said the war would be swift. He's also gone to Iraq (which he'll bring up on the campaign trail until we all want him to shut up) and knows what is going on "first hand". Of course all along he said that things were improving in Iraq.... just like Bush...
    come
    So now he says the war "can" be won in four years.... what's new, other than the number? There's no commitment to bring home the troops within four years... just that it "can" be won. Not that it "will" be won.

    Expect to see more McCain statements to come closer in line with the Dems' positions but being far enough apart from the Dems that his "new" positions aren't seen as a true pander. Just like Bush does.... McCain uses the language to appear more reasonable...

    But again, his position hasn't changed and this is classic Bush. After four years, McCain can still say we need to stay n Iraq because we haven't won yet.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Obama’s not quite Macaca moment, but “sweetie” reporter none too happy (UPDATED)
Ferrell-Fouts Award Nominee »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.