What of Obama’s Assertion that Wright Was His Pastor, Not His Spiritual Mentor?

April 29th, 2008 by MARK DANIELS

Last night, I met with a group of twenty adults from Saint Matthew Lutheran Church in Logan, Ohio, the congregation I serve as pastor. We were discussing some of the common reasons people give for not associating with a local church. One of these objections was, “I once had a bad experience with a pastor (or a congregation).” I asked the class members to tell me how they might respond if a friend said this to them.

Several answered and the gist of their responses was simple: “I don’t attend Sunday worship and I’m not involved with my church because of the pastor. I’m here because this is my Christian family. This is the fellowship in which I worship God, hear God’s Word, and receive the Sacraments.”

They admitted that if a pastor is a poor preacher or an indifferent visitor of the sick or unchurched or one prone to stubbornness, it can be tough to keep coming to worship week after week or to be involved in the church’s ministries. But each person who spoke said that Jesus Christ is the reason they’re involved with the Church, not the pastor.

To a pastor who cares about Christ and the Church, their sentiments were wonderful to hear. It means that even when I mess up, I’m working with a congregation that has a strong commitment to Christ and to the mission Christ gives to Christians. I’ve always subscribed to the notion that the best churches compensate for the weaknesses of their pastors and use the spiritual gifts of their members to pursue their ministries, often in spite of their pastors. As a pastor conscious of my own deficiencies, this is a huge comfort.

I bring all of this up because this afternoon, after returning from a lectionary study in Chillicothe, Ohio and spending time with the family of a wonderful member of Saint Matthew who passed away this afternoon, I came home for a late lunch during which I flipped on CNN and saw Senator Barack Obama’s press conference regarding the most recent public statements of Jeremiah Wright. Wright was, of course, Obama’s pastor for twenty years. Many of Wright’s public pronouncements have been at variance with what Obama has been talking about during his run for the presidency. Senators Clinton and McCain have both attempted to make political hay of the fact that Obama remained a member of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago and that in his speech in Philadelphia a few weeks ago, Obama refused to completely disassociate himself from Wright.

Today, Obama made a point with which the folks in last night’s class at Saint Matthew would totally agree:

…Now, to some degree, you know — I know that one thing that he [Wright] said was true, was that he wasn’t — you know, he was never my, quote-unquote, “spiritual adviser.”

He was never my “spiritual mentor.” He was — he was my pastor. And so to some extent, how, you know, the — the press characterized in the past that relationship, I think, wasn’t accurate.

But he was somebody who was my pastor, and married Michelle and I, and baptized my children, and prayed with us at — when we announced this race. And so, you know — so I’m disappointed…

For some, it may seem that Obama is trying to put too fine a point on things. But, in fact, my experience as both a pastor for the past twenty-four years and as an active adult layperson for some eight years before that buttresses the senator’s point. A pastor can be a spiritual mentor, particularly for those who seek out the pastor’s counsel. But a pastor isn’t a spiritual mentor to every member of her or his parish.

There are several reasons for this. The most important is that the larger a congregation becomes, the more difficult it is for a pastor to have a mentor/mentee relationship with a parishioner. Pastors and members may have one-on-one contacts at various juncture in a pastor’s ministry. Such contacts are likely to take place during hospital, nursing home, or home visits, on the occasion of Baptisms and funerals, while both are involved in committees or task forces of the congregation, and so forth. But even then, a pastor is seldom going to be seen as a primary spiritual mentor. A pastor’s sermons and classes may set the tone or context for much of the vision, mission, ministry, and life of a congregation and that’s as it should be because a pastor is above all, a leader. But whenever I ask people to identify primary spiritual influences in their lives, it generally takes a long time, some time after folks mention parents, grandparents, uncles, aunts, Sunday School teachers, and friends, before people say, “Pastor So and So.” Spiritual mentors are usually more up-close-and-personal than most pastors will ever be with their parishioners, especially in a congregation as large as Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago has become. To me, there’s validity to Obama’s distinction between spiritual mentors and pastors.

One other thing: Obama also disagreed with Jeremiah Wright’s assertion that disagreements with Wright reflected an attack on the black church in the United States. Said Obama:

I did not view the initial round of soundbites, that triggered this controversy, as an attack on the black church. I viewed it as a simplification of who he was, a caricature of who he was and, you know, more than anything, something that piqued a lot of political interest.

I didn’t see it as an attack on the black church. I mean, probably the only — the only aspect of it that probably had to do with specifically the black church is the fact that some people were surprised when he was shouting. I mean, that is just a black church tradition.

During my ministry in Cincinnati, after the riots of 2001, I joined with other concerned black and white pastors in making a deliberate effort to be part of bridging the divide between the races both within and outside the church. I played a small role and was no leader in that effort, but a willing, if sporadic, participant. I joined with black and white clergy to pray for our communities, for justice, and for racial reconciliation at quarterly ecumenical gatherings. I became part of the group of seventy Cincinnati-area citizens who invited Billy Graham to conduct a mission in the city in 2002, a major component of which was an effort toward bringing blacks and whites together. I also came to know, among others, the Rev. Ralph Godfrey, Sr., the founding pastor of New Life Temple Church in Madisonville. Pastor Godfrey was an extraordinary man, a spiritual entrepreneur whose initial ministry of providing baked good and wholesome activities for black teens turned into a great church that ministers to the spiritual, physical, social, and financial needs of the black community.

What I learned of the African-American Church during my seventeen years in metropolitan Cincinnati underscores what Senator Obama said today. Black preachers, to be sure, are inclined to yell when white preachers are not. But some of the ideas pushed by Jeremiah Wright as orthodoxies of the African-American Church–ideas that Obama himself catalogued, when he referenced Wright’s beliefs that “the U.S. government [is] somehow involved in AIDS, …suggests that Minister Farrakhan somehow represents one of the greatest voices of the 20th and 21st century,…equates the United States wartime efforts with terrorism”–have nothing to do with the African-American Church I have experienced. They are Jeremiah Wright’s ideas, not the ideas of the whole African-American Church.

The danger in all of this is that folks from either the conventional or new medias may begin to comb through the public pronouncements of every candidate’s pastor as a means of tripping candidates up. This would be terribly unfair because in healthy churches, the ministries of pastors may be appreciated even if parishioners don’t agree with everything their pastors say. As someone has said, if two people agree on everything, at least one of them is irrelevant.

Christians gather not to worship their pastors. (Thank God for that!) They gather to worship their God, serve in God’s name, and they pray that, most of the time, their pastors speak both faithfully and accurately about the God they believe is revealed on the pages of the Bible.

In that sense, Obama’s statements today reflect classic Christian understandings of pastors, the ministry, and the Church.

[This is being cross-posted at my personal blog.]

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 29th, 2008 at 4:46 pm and is filed under John McCain, Newsweek Blogitics, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, 2008 Elections, Politics. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Western Media Teaches China a ‘Lesson’ »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.