The Iraq Conundrum

April 24th, 2008 by DENNIS SANDERS

Michael Crowley of the New Republic, has a good article about Senator Obama and his Iraq policy. You will want to read the whole thing, but in short he says that while Obama is talking about getting out of Iraq, it might be more likely to see a reduced presence in Iraq.

I think that no matter who gets into the Oval Office in 2009, Iraq is not going to be easy to deal with and will probably go against what the bases of the political parties want.

There has been a lot of talk that either Hillary Clinton or Obama will not get the troops out yesterday, but I there has not been talk about what McCain would do other than the errorneous “100 years” remark. This is only my guess, but I tend to think that even though McCain has talked a lot about staying in Iraq and fighting, I have to think that he will also be thinking about how to best get America out of Iraq. Why? Because if he wins, he will have to face the responsibility of leading a nation that is in an unpopular war, where the body count is rising and rising with no end in sight. McCain might be a Vietnam Veteran and a hawk, but I think in his heart of hearts, he knows when a losing proposition is a losing proposition. My guess is that he might bring in the United Nations through some kind of peace keeping force, or do a whole bunch of shuttle diplomacy to European captials to get them involved (and privately offering a bunch of mea culpas). There might be some spin to make it look like we are chaning the focus (remember “peace with honor,”) and the mission might change to one of containment- trying to keep the instability in Iraq from spreading or threatening nearby nations.

Of course, this is all speculation and I could be totally wrong. But like the Dems, who have to face that they can’t get out as easy nor as fast as they want to, McCain will have to realize that we can’t stay there forever, either.

The sticking point on both sides are the bases of both parties. Will antiwar Democrats give a President Clinton or Obama some wiggle room in how best to end the conflict? Will pro-war Republicans concede that there is a time when we have to drawn down troops and end the war and allow a President McCain to oversee a withdrawl of forces? Will any of the candidates be strong of enough to face down their bases?

Beyond all the soundbites of “out of Iraq” or “Victory in Iraq,” is the realities of governing. Iraq is not as easy as both sides want it to be. It was politics that got us into the mess of Iraq. Let’s hope politics will not be what drives us getting out.

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 24th, 2008 at 11:23 am and is filed under John McCain, GWOT, Newsweek Blogitics, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, War On Terror, 2008 Elections. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

« Moyers and Wright, Tomorrow on PBS

McCain Opposes Equal Pay for Women »

By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.