Clinton Campaign Strategist Penn Says Obama Could Never Be Elected

March 13th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

JOE.gif

Some “old media” and new media pundits, as well as TV talking heads, political analysts and journalists, have concluded that Senator Hillary Clinton’s campaign’s strategy is to make Senator Barack Obama unelectable that they can go to the Superdelegates at a deadlocked convention and say Obama is…..unelectable.

(UPDATE: A new Gallup Poll, in fact, finds that Clinton and Obama would perform about as well against McCain. Key Gallup passage:

There are two notable findings in these data. First, despite the fact that the Democratic Party, in a generic sense, is better positioned than the Republican Party at this point in time, the Republican nominee is running neck and neck with the two possible Democratic nominees. Second, despite continuing focus on the relative electability of Obama versus Clinton , there is no difference in the way either stacks up against McCain.)

Today, a top Clinton campaign strategist jumped the gun by saying it outright now, raising eyebrows, bringing in some critical fire — and causing a quick if clumsily executed backtrack:

Though the campaign later argued that he hadn’t said it, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s chief campaign strategist told reporters this morning that Sen. Barack Obama “can’t win the general election.”

Mark Penn made the comment during a conference call in which the Clinton campaign and two of her supporters — Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell and Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter — argued that Obama has sent Pennsylvanians a bad signal by allegedly downplaying the importance of that state’s April 22 primary. They made the case that this memo from Obama campaign manager David Plouffe (which Nutter said the author should be fired for writing), would come back to haunt Obama in the fall if he is the Democratic nominee.

Here is what Penn said. We’re posting a little more than 2 minutes of his opening statement because we want to make sure you get the full context. It’s in the last 20 seconds or so that he says Obama “really can’t win the general election.” As you’ll hear, he also says that “if Barack Obama can’t win” in Pennsylvania, “how could he win the general election?”

In fact, polls show that Obama would beat Republican John McCain right now in Pennsylvania — that (right now…before the heavy remaining-primary artillery is unleashed) Obama is electable.

Meanwhile, even though reporters heard Penn say it with their own ears, a Clinton official later insisted they had not heard what they heard — that Obama was unelectable (before the Clinton campaign had finished making him unelectable):

Later, a reporter asks what he meant. Clinton campaign communications chief Howard Wolfson jumps in to say that “Mark did not say that.”

Then Penn says that if Obama doesn’t win the Pennsylvania primary, it “raises serious questions” about whether he can win the general election.

(Click on the story link and you can actually hear the audio).

The emerging Clinton strategy is a risky one, indeed.

Obama will likely face a barrage of negative campaigning and be caught in a Catch 22: if he doesn’t respond and deal with it, he looks weak or charges are believed — and his poll numbers go down. If he loses his cool, he can make fatal mistake or look like a mean guy or like any other gut-fighting politician.

The problems are:

(1) If Clinton wins the nomination this way, she will most likely have split the 1960s-forged strong relationship between the Democratic Party and African-American voters.

(2) If she does win the election, she’ll have Republicans against her and a chunk of the Democratic Party. Unless she wins in a landslide, 1990s-2000s polarization will continue worse than ever.

Writes The New Republic’s Jonathan Chait:

As I said, Obama was running well ahead of Clinton in head-to-head matchups a few weeks ago, and now they’re tied. After several more weeks of Clinton reinforcing McCain’s message against Obama, Clinton will probably be performing better than Obama against McCain. This is the point I made in my TRB column. She needs to convince the remaining uncommitted superdelegates to split for her by about a 2-to-1 margin. The only way she can get a split like that is if she can persuasively argue that Obama is unelectable. And the only way she can do that is to make him unelectable. Some people have treated this as an unfortunate byproduct of Clinton’s decision to continue her campaign. It’s actually a central element of the strategy. Penn is already saying he’s unelectable. It’s not true, but by the time the convention rolls around, it may well be.

My DD’s Jonathan Singer on Penn’s comments about Obama:

If this charge were not so absurd on its face it would merit a long-winded takedown, here and elsewhere. However, in short I’d point readers to a couple of things: One, state-by-state polling showing Barack Obama to be at least as strong a competitor to John McCain as Hillary Clinton, as well as national polling that quite consistently shows Obama either leading McCain or tied with him (and running at least as well as Clinton against McCain); and two, the analysis of non-partisan election tracker Marc Ambinder, who doesn’t have a dog in this race and generally calls these things fairly and evenly.

Jules Crittenden:

Obama can’t win the general election, says Clinton strategist. They keep up with this ugly truth thing, sooner or later they won’t be Dems anymore. Speaking of ugly truth, bad news, Hill. Unless McCain’s heart starts skipping beats or he goes seriously Manchurian, you won’t be winning the general either. He’s got the moderates and you, or Obama, will bring the con-cons around.

Mark Ambinder:

Of course Obama can win the general election; it’s illogical to generalize from the vote totals alone, as I and others have pointed out. Yes, Obama’s Gary Hart-Jesse Jackson coalition is untested in modern general elections, but we live in hyperpartisan times, Democrats have an enormous partisan identification identification advantage, and Democrats are much more enthusiastic about their candidate than Republicans are. There’s just no way to justify Penn’s assertion from reading a poll.

It is worth pointing out that several polls suggest that Obama may lose white working class voters, especially men, to John McCain. That’s something to keep an eye on. But it’s not a reason to pre-emptively declare that he can’t win the general election.


Cartoon by RJ Matson, Roll Call




This entry was posted on Thursday, March 13th, 2008 at 8:20 pm and is filed under John McCain, Elections, Spin, Newsweek Blogitics, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, 2008 Elections, Democrats, Republicans, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 2 Comments

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.