« Bill Clinton and Sarah Palin: Funny Stuff…
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Stay for Troy Anthony Davis 2 Hours Before Georgia Execution (UPDATED) »



Absentee Leaders: Obama, McCain and Biden

September 23rd, 2008
By JAZZ SHAW, Assistant Editor

Print Print

After watching much of the television coverage of the Money Market Meltdown ™ I find it rather depressing to note that I had to go to the L.A. Times to find this story. In the midst of possibly the most critical debate of this year, where are Senators Obama, McCain and Biden? Let’s see…

Profiles in courage? McCain, Obama may skip bailout vote

Here’s a quick one this morning: The website Politico reports that Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama may skip the vote on the Paulson bailout plan — if and when the plan comes to a vote in the Senate.

Hold on here… isn’t McCain on the banking committee? (And was previously the chair, if I recall correctly.) And though he seemed to be confused, didn’t Obama think he was on the banking committee? And Joe Biden often just seems plain confused, but he’s still in the Senate, right? Wouldn’t you think that these three would be leading the charge back to Washington to grill the actors in this play, get their positions out in front of the public and cast their votes before nearly a trillion taxpayer dollars go sailing off to Wall Street? You aren’t even going to vote on it????

Ok… I can see Palin not being there. She’s a state governor and probably isn’t much up on Wall Street matters, (and she’s busy ducking the press while meeting with the first foreigners of her experience) but the Senate needs to be present and accounted for. These three in particular. Hello? Is this thing on? Am I the only one wondering about this? Couldn’t these clowns miss out on one podium appearance in Intercourse, Pennsylvania to sit in on this?

Let’s go back to the L.A. Times for a moment.

This is a chance to show leadership. To date neither of these guys has shown much leadership on the subject — neither bothered to even mention the credit crisis in their convention speech. Were they unaware of it? Forgot about it? Are they afraid to take a stand? Do these guys want to lead, follow, or do they want to get out of the way?

Well said, sir. Well said.



This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008 at 6:18 pm and is filed under Joe Biden, John McCain, Barack Obama, 2008 Elections, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 7 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    It's getting near the peak of the campaign and those other three have tasks on the road to do as well as back in Washington. Also, don't confuse lack of exposure to doing or saying little -- Obama and McCain, and Biden, have had things to say about the current financial issues before us, but the media remain largely obscessed with Palin. (They have particularly neglected Biden ever since McCain chose Palin.)
    • ^
    • v
    I think Harry Reid said it best when he looked straight into the camera and said flatly "we don't know what to do". None of them do. They are simply too afraid of the fallout, whatever it may be. If you vote for it, the other side will label you as raising taxes. If you vote against it, the other side will say you didn't do enough to fix the situation. This is the current political situation. I've said on a previous thread that if you really want to load up the comment box here, then you might as well tag your post with Palin's name, or better yet, put her name in the title. A brief view of Memeorandum shows what a lot of people are really concerned about.
    • ^
    • v
    I agree with Jchem about their fear of fallout. Now, I don't think that's a good thing, but there it is, especially considering Josh Marshall's summary of what seems to be the McCain plan:

    The Republican/McCain plan is to get the Democrats to bail out the GOP's Wall Street friends and then run against them for doing it.


    I think summary is accurate.
    • ^
    • v
    I think the best thing they both could do is stay out of the way. At this time neither one of them can do anything about it. Neither one has anything to contribute. And anything they say at this point will be entirely political.
    • ^
    • v
    Far of fallout extends to the presidential contest as well. Anyone showing initiative and being the first to express a position on some issue, any issue, does so with the likehood it will be attacked by the other side.

    Actually, George, it's different than what you and Josh Marshall think about the current GOP behavior. They're rushing to bail out the financial institutions not only to help their friends, but to try to put out this economy-related "fire" so as to steal it effectively from Obama before it can harm McCain and the GOP more than it has already. That's a good deal of why there's such antagonism behind the global-warming-at-its-looniest insistence on rushing to act without any thinking or questioning what "must" be done immediately. (The rest of it comes from the farther left, that this is Bush-style driving similar to the buildup to war in Iraq, with which I disagree -- Iraq was slower and less agitated.)

    I wish they would just step back and let these institutions fail, as they should, reform themselves (i.e., the federal government) first, then approach the aftermath of the failures with a more learned and mature nature.
    • ^
    • v
    Mr Shaw: A couple of comments...

    First, I detect a certain contempt, on your part, for the activity of campaigning for President of the United States. Does this mean that you equate it's being a slogging, mundane, and often absurd process with it's being somehow unimportant?

    Next, of all the people who should keep their mouths shut about this, I would single out both McCain and Obama. (I think you have a point about Biden, since I doubt anyone would listen to the guy.) They are Senators (in name, at least, if not in actions), but one of them will, in fact, be the POTUS in a very short time. If this situation shows us anything, it's the childlike ignorance of market traders, those to whom we have foolishly, and unavoidably, entrusted the duty of managing our money. These folks regard panic as a useful and legitimate tool of high-finance. We shouldn't confuse them, any more than they already are, about who they should be listening to.
    • ^
    • v
    I agree that they should vote. They're going to have to take high profile individual stands as Prez. Might as well practice now.
 
close Reblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
blog comments powered by Disqus

« Bill Clinton and Sarah Palin: Funny Stuff…
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Stay for Troy Anthony Davis 2 Hours Before Georgia Execution (UPDATED) »


By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.