McCain’s Next Task: Win Undecideds And Moderates

September 6th, 2008
By JOE GANDELMAN, Editor-In-Chief

Print Print

_7B762783E1_4B27_464A_9752_458A843FBA4C_7D.gif

Republican Presidential nominee Sen. John McCain has now accomplished several major tasks: he was last-man-standing in the GOP primaries, he moved enough to the right to satisfy many Republicans and he hit — to use the now-tiresome cliche — “a home-run” among the party’s conservative base by picking conservative red-meat serving Gov. Sarah Palin as his Vice Presidential choice. So what’s his next task?

Winning a good chunk of the undecideds and moderates because, as the Christian Science Monitor notes, he can’t win this election without them:

But the 8-1/2 weeks until Election Day will bring the real test: convincing enough undecided voters, many only now tuning into the race, that John McCain should be president.

That fight, political analysts say, will turn in large measure on Senator McCain’s ability to wrest the mantle of “change” from Sen. Barack Obama and win independents and conservative Democrats in swing states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Michigan.

“The shift we saw at the convention was away from a strict reliance on the experience card, to a revamped message that McCain will bring about the right kind of change,” says Lawrence Jacobs, director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota.

“This is not a Karl Rove play-the-base strategy,” he added, referring to President Bush’s former strategist who won elections with partisan wedges like gay marriage and abortion. “This is a really significant shift away from that.”

McCain has walked a political tightrope since losing the nomination to George Bush in 2000. His campaign in 2000 was about building coalitions aimed at a more bipartisan form of winning and governing. During the past 8 years he has relentlessly-wooed segments of the party that were out to get him in 2000 — from some GOP leaders in Congress to evangelicals. It wasn’t pretty. And in some of these circles “bipartisanship” is considered weakness or disloyalty. A combination of his efforts (skill) plus other 2008 primary candidates flopping or canceling themselves out (luck) helped him win.

This new battle could be a truly tougher one:

“The Palin nomination excited and united the base,” says James Campbell, a political scientist at the University at Buffalo, in New York. “Now he has to win over moderates.”

By Professor Jacobs’s estimate, McCain would have to win some 55 percent of independents and more than 15 percent of Democrats – a tall order – to defeat Senator Obama.

Palin’s pick excited the party’s base and the negative press and blog coverage about her solidified GOP party base support for her pick. She became a hero because of her enemies.

Now it moves into a new phase:

Obama, who accepted the Democratic presidential nomination last week, leads McCain by nearly six points in an average of polls compiled by the website Real Clear Politics. Less than a third of Americans approve of President George Bush, the party’s standard-bearer for the past eight years.

Voter surveys earlier this week found that a Palin vice presidency makes scant difference to most women. Even after her selection last Friday, Democrats were nearly 50 percent more likely than Republicans to feel enthusiastic about voting this year, according to a Gallup poll.

For Republicans, the race is likely to be won, or lost, in Pennsylvania and the populous Midwestern battlegrounds of Ohio and Michigan. Also important are a string of states Bush won in 2004 but where Obama now leads – even if by a whisker – in the polls: Virginia, Iowa, Colorado, and New Mexico.

Up for grabs are economically struggling but socially conservative voters – both blue-collar and middle class – who may have stayed home or backed Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton in the primaries and are now on the fence.

“McCain will win the South, Obama will win the East and West coasts,” says GOP strategist John Bell. “The real fight is going to be in the Midwest and in Pennsylvania.”

To win those states, he says, McCain has to paint Obama as a kind of wolf in sheep’s clothing – a traditional tax-raising liberal hiding behind an unearned image as bipartisan uniter. At the same time, he has to toughen his defenses against efforts by Democrats to tar him as an heir to Bush.

This will be the toughest tightrope yet for McCain to walk: saying he’s for bipartisanship when his Vice Presidential pick is decimating the Democrats and saying he’s going to bring change while the Demmies paint him as Bush Lite. He must convince undecideds and moderates that his administration won’t be Rush Limbaugh/Sean Hannity Nirvana but will be a new era where the views of non-conservatives will be respected and seriously considered as well.

That may be hard to do in a campaign laced with increasing mockery and sarcasm — which translated means showing a lack of respect and near-contempt. YouTubes, the mega-speed of the Internet, and the fierce competition among cable news networks for compelling and particularly-controversial product to fill airtime means McCain won’t be able to just take the high road and let his ads and Palin run a 50 + 1 party base mobilization campaign while he seeks to project a loftier image. It will be noticed if he does.

Unlike in the primaries, this time he won’t be walking a tightrope in danger of falling off due to Republican opponents shaking the wire.

This time he’ll walk a tightrope in danger of falling off due to Democrats shaking the wire, and it’ll tougher to pull this off with Democrats than battling his Republican primary opponents.

Or will it?

Cartoon by Frederick Deligne, Nice-Matin, France




This entry was posted on Saturday, September 6th, 2008 at 12:47 pm and is filed under Independents, Democratic Party, Republican Party, Newsweek Blogitics, Sarah Palin, Negative Campaigning, Barry Goldwater, John McCain, Conservatives, 2008 Elections, Independent Voters, Democrats, Republicans, Politics. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Viewing 1 Comment

 
close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus



By posting comments on The Moderate Voice you are acknowledging and agreeing to the following general comments policy:

(1) The Moderate Voice's comments are hosted by Disqus (http://disqus.com). If your comment doesn't appear immediately, please be patient since it is an off-site system.

(2) All e-mail received from readers by The Moderate Voice is considered intended for publication unless otherwise indicated in the initial message from the writer. Please do not send us attachments unless you contact us and we agree to it.

(3)The Moderate Voice reserves the right to edit all e-mail and posted comments for content, clarity, and length.

(4) Our comment space is reserved for comments that relate to a post's topic. You should not reprint lengthy text from your own works or those of others, including news articles. You MAY link to them.

(5) Comments that are abusive, offensive, contain profane or racist material or violate the terms of service for this blog's host provider will be removed and the author(s) banned from future comments. Such comments also violate the very SPIRIT of this site -- which was created to encourage thoughtful and vigorous discussion among readers who may share differing viewpoints.

(6) All points of view are welcome on The Moderate Voice, with the following exceptions:

(a) Comments posted several times a day with the intent of dominating, re-directing or hijacking the thread by turning a discussion into the equivalent of a bitter shouting match.

(b) Comments posted several times a day that insult or call other commenters or blog writers names or repeatedly make the same point with the effect of or clear intent to annoy other commenters or blog writers.

(7) Name-calling, personal attacks, racist comments or use of profanity by any commenter, whether they are by persons who agree or disagree with the views expressed by The Moderate Voice will NOT be tolerated and will result in the deletion of the comment and the banning of the commenter's ISP address, without notice. In some cases a comment may be deleted and the writer will be given another chance. Commenters who virtually ASK The Moderate Voice to ban them by ignoring any warnings or daring TMV to ban them will quickly get their wish.

(8) Anonymous commenters should identify themselves with the same moniker, so readers know their comments are coming from a single individual. If they don't, they are subject to a banning.

(9)If we have problems with inappropriate or inflammatory comments from a commenter who it turns out gave a fake email address that person is subject to immediate banning.

(10) Quotes from material appearing on The Moderate Voice with attribution are allowed. Reprints are allowed only by permission from The Moderate Voice. You may request permission by e-mail.

(11) The Moderate Voice is a personal site. It is not the Government. It is NOT aligned with any political party. It is NOT promoting any specific candidate for office. It is not a public institution or a media organization. It is not a neutral site. It is intended to express and disseminate the authors' varying points of views. Writers on this weblog WILL take positions. It reserves the right to limit comments to those that, in its view, comport with its stated comment policy. Comments that do not comply are subject to deletion and banning of the author's ISP.

Disclaimer:

--Reading and posting comments at The Moderate Voice constitutes acknowledgment of and agreement to the terms outlined in this comment policy. This comment policy may be revised in part or in full at any time.

--All comments must comport with applicable state and federal laws. The Moderate Voice has no obigation to monitor, edit, censor, or take responsibility for comments. It may or may not act upon a violation of its comment policy once a suspected violation has been brought to its attention. Therefore, commenters are solely responsible for the content of their comments and should ensure that that their comments are lawful and fall within the stated guidelines of both The Moderate Voice and its hosting company.

--The Moderate Voice is not be responsible for injury or liability to any reader or commenter resulting from its own communications or those of commenters, that may be offensive, misleading, inaccurate, illegal, or otherwise unsuitable in the view of the reader. Readers and commenters further agree to indemnify and hold harmless The Moderate Voice from claims resulting from the use of any material appearing on The Moderate Voice which damages the reader, commenter or any other party.

--The Moderate Voice is not responsible for and might disagree with material posted in the comments section. While we strive for accuracy in our posts and DO correct errors, material posted by The Moderate Voice in its posts -- or those left by others in the comments section -- may or may not be accurate.

Read and Post at your own risk.